(Former) Fifth Security Council

Europe and Asia wrote:Eurussia is saying that the more people we have, the more bureaucracy we will have. Less is better, in this case.

Precisely. Thank you.

ok that makes sense...

If we change the number of nations on the SC, we should increase it or not change it at all. We should allow more nations to be involved in the politics and governing of this region, not less. This is a political game, after all, so it makes sense to allow many people to be part of the political process.

How about none???

well we want to help make decisions

@Aloia,

That is why instead of fixing the numbers, we are moving to determine the numbers via ratio depending on the population so as not to require another round of long process of constitutional amendment...

I would like to see 1:17, because it's a good size, and it's an odd number so no ties can be formed (not counting abstains).

Holy Patrician States wrote:I would like to see 1:17, because it's a good size, and it's an odd number so no ties can be formed (not counting abstains).

What?

I was more in favor of 1:15, but I guess 1:17 is good.

New-Zealand wrote:I was more in favor of 1:15, but I guess 1:17 is good.

What?!

1 SC member per 17 WA members.

The President has nominated three new nations to the Council as replacement for Aloia, Planita 2, and Holy Patrician States who resigned from their post. And with the confirmation from the Security Council,

The following member nations will seat in the Security Council to complete the unfinished terms of the previous member nations. And they are: Europe & Asia, Newasia, and Naujoji Amerika. Congratulations and Good Luck!

FIFTH SECURITY COUNCIL MEMBERS



Term of Office : June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013

President : New Zealand

Members : Novo Canuckia, Marquette, Europe & Asia, Newasia, Naujoji Amerika, Eurussia

I like HPS's idea, but how many WA members are there in the World Alliance? That might get out of hand. Perhaps another branch of government, a representative branch?

Maybe we could go for Vendoland's idea of determining the number of Council seats based on the number registered on the forums! I think if's fair since most actions on regional affairs are held in the Forums.

And I would say those registered are those willing to engage in regional affairs. What do you think?

i think so

If we use forum numbers, the ratio should be 1:5 or so.

The we'd still be in the same position.

Technically if we did that we would have 18 SC members... but considering many of those members are not with us anymore (We should probably delete their accounts), it would end up being around 10-12 SC members.

I would suggest ratio of 1:10 or above. So that when our population continuous to grow, we wouldn't be cramped by so many members in the SC that practically will delay passage of several proposals. Now that we have only 7 and it takes so long to get everybody on board, having huge membership in the SC is a concern.

1:10, with a minimum of 7 members.

The President of the World Alliance and the Security Council has nominated Dromoda to the Security Council to replace the vacancy of Europe & Asia, and with the concurrence of the majority approval of the Security Council, Dromoda is now a member of the Security Council:

The current composition of the Security Council:

President: New Zealand

Members: Newasia, Novo Canuckia, Kulon bangsa, Marquette, Dromoda, Eurussia