(Dismissed) North Korreaan Removal Petition

• Repeated Inactivity, usually gone between 7-9 days without any notice of any kind. Magically re-appears when WA Accountability Act is attempted on the DPRK.
  
• While the government of e DPRK may exist, they now hold no land or claims of any kind as multiple nations have invaded and captured their territory. They cannot be expected to accurately represent nations if they cannot prevent their own destruction.
  
• The DPRK has accused the WASC of conspiring against the DPRK and as such voted against all pending resolutions and laws in order to "protest" the conspiracy, which is harmful to the region as it can make it more difficult to pass legislation when a delegate is voting against everything.
  

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:This resolution is not based on any current laws. This is a proposal to remove North Korreaa from the WASC on a few grounds.

• Repeated Inactivity, usually gone between 7-9 days without any notice of any kind. Magically re-appears when WA Accountability Act is attempted on the DPRK.
  
• While the government of e DPRK may exist, they now hold no land or claims of any kind as multiple nations have invaded and captured their territory. They cannot be expected to accurately represent nations if they cannot prevent their own destruction.
  
• The DPRK has accused the WASC of conspiring against the DPRK and as such voted against all pending resolutions and laws in order to "protest" the conspiracy, which is harmful to the region as it can make it more difficult to pass legislation when a delegate is voting against everything.
  

I feel that it is the responsibility of the WASC to govern itself and remove defunct delegates. Please feel free to provide input, claims, evidence, etc on this matter as I believe this is the first resolution of its kind.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:This resolution is not based on any current laws. This is a proposal to remove North Korreaa from the WASC on a few grounds.

While the government of e DPRK may exist, they now hold no land or claims of any kind as multiple nations have invaded and captured their territory. They cannot be expected to accurately represent nations if they cannot prevent their own destruction.

The DPRK has accused the WASC of conspiring against the DPRK and as such voted against all pending resolutions and laws in order to "protest" the conspiracy, which is harmful to the region as it can make it more difficult to pass legislation when a delegate is voting against everything.

I feel that it is the responsibility of the WASC to govern itself and remove defunct delegates. Please feel free to provide input, claims, evidence, etc on this matter as I believe this is the first resolution of its kind.

China China wrote:China China support Security Council and friends to invade DPRK and free people of Suprme Leader Kim Jong Un.

China China wrote:China China support Security Council and friends to invade DPRK and free people of Suprme Leader Kim Jong Un.

The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:

China China wrote:China China support Security Council and friends to invade DPRK and free people of Suprme Leader Kim Jong Un.

he is trying to suck up to the Security Council and brown nose you all. He hasn't got a clue what is going on, he is scared that he will share the same fate as North Korreaa and he should. Disgusting that such a representative such as China China still remains on the Security Council.

North Korreaa wrote:You cannot remove DPRK from Security Council. I work hard to get appointed here.

North Korreaa wrote:You cannot remove DPRK from Security Council. I work hard to get appointed here.

North Korreaa wrote:You cannot remove DPRK from Security Council. I work hard to get appointed here.

Xolox wrote:Xolox is against this proposal.

•From what I've seen, he's active at least every 3 days. Usually every other day, and sometimes more. There are more than a few members that I have only seen post in the news once or twice, it would be wrong to single him out over this, and he's a lot more active than the ones I'm thinking of. The fact is, we don't have a huge pool of nations to choose council seats from. The council isn't even full yet! I strongly believe that the council needs to be reworked( based on activity, among other things) once we have a more active community, but now is not the time for that.
•There is a government in exile, and we are currently working on creating a successor state to it. I don't think all member states should necessarily be able to prevent their own destruction, as long as they can get out of it, like DPRK is beginning to. There are nations with a small or even nonexistent army. The interests of militarily challenged nations should be represented by a member of the council.
•It has been pretty harmless so far, his one vote has not majorly affected the outcomes of many laws. The Security Council decided to forgive and retain China China for nuking me and burning Articmania's capital. If China China was afforded a second chance for such heinous crimes, the same should be provided for North Korreaa.

Xolox wrote:Xolox is against this proposal.

•From what I've seen, he's active at least every 3 days. Usually every other day, and sometimes more. There are more than a few members that I have only seen post in the news once or twice, it would be wrong to single him out over this, and he's a lot more active than the ones I'm thinking of. The fact is, we don't have a huge pool of nations to choose council seats from. The council isn't even full yet! I strongly believe that the council needs to be reworked( based on activity, among other things) once we have a more active community, but now is not the time for that.
•There is a government in exile, and we are currently working on creating a successor state to it. I don't think all member states should necessarily be able to prevent their own destruction, as long as they can get out of it, like DPRK is beginning to. There are nations with a small or even nonexistent army. The interests of militarily challenged nations should be represented by a member of the council.
•It has been pretty harmless so far, his one vote has not majorly affected the outcomes of many laws. The Security Council decided to forgive and retain China China for nuking me and burning Articmania's capital. If China China was afforded a second chance for such heinous crimes, the same should be provided for North Korreaa.

• You can clearly see that he has a history of inactivity, you said it yourself, he's off for several days at a time, plus if you look at the two times I tried to put the Accountability act on him, he's been gone 7-8 days those times. Also, are you saying that you would rather have some random nation who only logs on once or twice a week and isn't informed with what's going on rather than no nation at all? I personally would like no nation to be in a voting position if hey cannot stay informed or stay active enough to role play frequently. I see that all other members of the WASC are remaining active except the DPRK. Furthermore, I can understand if a nation issues a loa, this means that we, as a council are informed and we don't have to wait on the nation expecting an opinion or vote from them.
  
• A government who cannot clean up at home, whatever the case may be, should not be in the WASC.
  
• Quite frankly If that's the case and China china instigated it, I don't understand why you let him have a seat back on e council when our region is suppose to promote peace.
  

Xolox wrote:There are nations with a small or even nonexistent army. The interests of militarily challenged nations should be represented by a member of the council.

Snarfia wrote:I agree with Xolox, he deserves another chance otherwise it wouldn't be fair against DPRK because we gave China China another chance too