(Passed) Freedom of Speech Law

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

FREEDOM OF SPEECH LAW

MEU is the author

Article 4

Past laws that prevents this are deleted.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

FREEDOM OF SPEECH LAW

MEU is the author

Article 4

Past laws that prevents this are deleted.

Eurussia expresses opposition over this provision as we insist on either specifying the exact law this Act could interfere with or simply remove the entire provision. Because this is too general which could lead to complicated interpretations.

On the other hand, Eurussia supports the proposal but we will hold our vote.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

FREEDOM OF SPEECH LAW

MEU is the author

Article 4

Past laws that prevents this are deleted.

Eurussia expresses opposition over this provision as we insist on either specifying the exact law this Act could interfere with or simply remove the entire provision. Because this is too general which could lead to complicated interpretations.

On the other hand, Eurussia supports the proposal but we will hold our vote.

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

FREEDOM OF SPEECH LAW

MEU is the author

Article 1 

The law wants to open the WASC for all nations of the region to join the discussions that affects them. That is why this short law is being proposed for the benefit of all nations of World alliance.

Article 2

The law allows nations not members of WASC to join discussions of Security Council except on court cases to avoid interruption. But they cannot still vote because that is only given to members of WASC.

Article 3

Nations of the region can submit proposals for WASC to discuss and vote if it is supported by one member of WASC.

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

FREEDOM OF SPEECH LAW

MEU is the author

Article 1 

The law wants to open the WASC for all nations of the region to join the discussions that affects them. That is why this short law is being proposed for the benefit of all nations of World alliance.

Article 2

The law allows nations not members of WASC to join discussions of Security Council except on court cases to avoid interruption. But they cannot still vote because that is only given to members of WASC.

Article 3

Nations of the region can submit proposals for WASC to discuss and vote if it is supported by one member of WASC.

I have removed Article 4.

Trinity Sector wrote:With 1 yea, 0 abstains, and 0 nays. I checked twice; The Freedom of Speech Law has offically passed.

Great Eurussia wrote:

3) Under the WA General Elections Act, there is a strict requirement that there must be at least THREE MEMBERS in the SC before any of its decision could take effect. On this proposal, only a single vote (according to the VP) has been cast and yet the proposal has passed. We believe that we should introduce a quorum requirement where there must be AT LEAST THREE VOTES cast as well to enforce a vote. Just for a thought.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Trinity Sector wrote:With 1 yea, 0 abstains, and 0 nays. I checked twice; The Freedom of Speech Law has offically passed.

Eurussia welcomes the passage of the law. But we would like to raise these two points for the consideration of our fellow member states of the SC and the leadership of the international body:

1) In practice, as other proposals have shown, votes MAY BE counted from the time the proposal has been submitted in the floor whether it is still subject for debate.

2) In practice, as this proposal have shown, votes MAY BE counted or restricted only from the time the vote has been officially called.

3) Under the WA General Elections Act, there is a strict requirement that there must be at least THREE MEMBERS in the SC before any of its decision could take effect. On this proposal, only a single vote (according to the VP) has been cast and yet the proposal has passed. We believe that we should introduce a quorum requirement where there must be AT LEAST THREE VOTES cast as well to enforce a vote. Just for a thought.