Security Council Membership Reforms

I was thinking about adding some additional seats of power to the world alliance as to get more people active in the WA government.

One of my suggestions is that we have a sufficient military where we could elect generals and military officials for the purpose of role play possibly with other regions as it could open up a wider range of activities and new role plays. And/or we have a set military force that is made up of countries within their respective continent as to also further role play, if we did that, colonial claims by nations on other continents would be counted out as if they were never there. And/Or we keep the colonies in the military statistics but split them respectively based on how many military personnel a nation wants in a specific area.


Now, if we had a judicial area for seating, it could preform like the security council but lesson the weight by handling national cases, while the SC handles the legislative law passing part. And/Or adding more seats to the security council by making seats "under" the actual member for the continent, one that would be given a lesser amount of privileges.

I am unsure about the second suggestion, but it could be worth a shot.

Wirbanskia wrote:I was thinking about adding some additional seats of power to the world alliance as to get more people active in the WA government.

One of my suggestions is that we have a sufficient military where we could elect generals and military officials for the purpose of role play possibly with other regions as it could open up a wider range of activities and new role plays. And/or we have a set military force that is made up of countries within their respective continent as to also further role play, if we did that, colonial claims by nations on other continents would be counted out as if they were never there. And/Or we keep the colonies in the military statistics but split them respectively based on how many military personnel a nation wants in a specific area.


Now, if we had a judicial area for seating, it could preform like the security council but lesson the weight by handling national cases, while the SC handles the legislative law passing part. And/Or adding more seats to the security council by making seats "under" the actual member for the continent, one that would be given a lesser amount of privileges.

I am unsure about the second suggestion, but it could be worth a shot.

I'm not sure how you can expect people to get more involved when there's practically a minimal activity out of the WASC in the first place.

I agree we need to open more seats because our region is growing

I think this issue is addressed through Scouting's proposal to remove the inactive WASC members from their seats; so active people can take their place instead, revitalizing the roleplay.

Wirbanskia wrote:I was thinking about adding some additional seats of power to the world alliance as to get more people active in the WA government.

One of my suggestions is that we have a sufficient military where we could elect generals and military officials for the purpose of role play possibly with other regions as it could open up a wider range of activities and new role plays. And/or we have a set military force that is made up of countries within their respective continent as to also further role play, if we did that, colonial claims by nations on other continents would be counted out as if they were never there. And/Or we keep the colonies in the military statistics but split them respectively based on how many military personnel a nation wants in a specific area.


Now, if we had a judicial area for seating, it could preform like the security council but lesson the weight by handling national cases, while the SC handles the legislative law passing part. And/Or adding more seats to the security council by making seats "under" the actual member for the continent, one that would be given a lesser amount of privileges.

I am unsure about the second suggestion, but it could be worth a shot.

This is now an OPEN discussion.

Wirbanskia wrote:
Now, if we had a judicial area for seating, it could preform like the security council but lesson the weight by handling national cases, while the SC handles the legislative law passing part. And/Or adding more seats to the security council by making seats "under" the actual member for the continent, one that would be given a lesser amount of privileges.

I am unsure about the second suggestion, but it could be worth a shot.

1) Each continental representation will have another 'secondary seat' whereas they can also be allowed to share their opinions and submit proposals EXCEPT on voting privileges.

We have way too much trouble trying to fill 15 seats. Xolox is against adding 13 more seats to the council.

Xolox wrote:We have way too much trouble trying to fill 15 seats. Xolox is against adding 13 more seats to the council.

I am in favor. Why? Because we may not be able to fill it now but at least we could force those inactive council members to be active or else get replaced.

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:

Xolox wrote:We have way too much trouble trying to fill 15 seats. Xolox is against adding 13 more seats to the council.

I am in favor. Why? Because we may not be able to fill it now but at least we could force those inactive council members to be active or else get replaced.

I like the way you think.

I support reforms

Scouting motions to dismiss discussion, citing inactivity.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Scouting motions to dismiss discussion, citing inactivity.

I support this.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Scouting motions to dismiss discussion, citing inactivity.

Motion granted.