Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

New-Zealand Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:02 pm

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

Shirouma Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:03 pm

Against

Marquette (of Pacific) Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:35 am

New-Zealand wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Ireland Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:37 am

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
New-Zealand wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Hes not giving it away. I believe it is going to be elected by the Council or Parliment but hes not just going to give it away like the lottery.

Great Eurussia Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:22 am

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Planitan Commonwealth Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:27 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

hint... hint....

Marquette (of Pacific) Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:28 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Eurussia, shut up. I am understanding this bill perfectly, and I understand I don't support it. As I said before, our current system is fine. We don't need to change things just for the sake of change or because it will make elections more fluid or easier.

Planitan Commonwealth Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:37 pm

I give FULL SUPPORT for this bill.

Ireland Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:41 pm

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Eurussia, shut up. I am understanding this bill perfectly, and I understand I don't support it. As I said before, our current system is fine. We don't need to change things just for the sake of change or because it will make elections more fluid or easier.

That's your opinion. No you aren't understanding this bill and it has tremendous support so how about you just deal with that.

Arveyres Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:50 pm

Marquette, obviously you are not understanding.

This makes a new role to take power away from the Secretary General. This is to make elections easier. This does not give power to the SG.

Until you realize what the proposed bill imposes, I will continue to use bold font. Please don't make me go bold italics.

New-Zealand Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:27 pm

Arveyres wrote:Marquette, obviously you are not understanding.

This makes a new role to take power away from the Secretary General. This is to make elections easier. This does not give power to the SG.

Until you realize what the proposed bill imposes, I will continue to use bold font. Please don't make me go bold italics.

Not the bold Italics!

(Passed) Election Regulation Act - Page 2 3335747_1376602408580.17res_500_299

Great Eurussia Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:03 pm

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
Eurussia, shut up. I am understanding this bill perfectly, and I understand I don't support it. As I said before, our current system is fine. We don't need to change things just for the sake of change or because it will make elections more fluid or easier.

lol really? Marquette seems to have the Secretary General to become more powerful so that when a flaw happens, even if its beyond the SG's control, he can easily strike back to Eurussia and accuse it of so much power grab. lol I hope not :-P

Atletius Wed Feb 12, 2014 7:28 pm

In FAVOUR

Europe and Asia Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:08 pm

New-Zealand wrote:
Arveyres wrote:Marquette, obviously you are not understanding.

This makes a new role to take power away from the Secretary General. This is to make elections easier. This does not give power to the SG.

Until you realize what the proposed bill imposes, I will continue to use bold font. Please don't make me go bold italics.

Not the bold Italics!

Oh he went there.

Federation of Antanares Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:06 pm

Well, the time for election is finished. Wait for the final votes.

FOR: 7
ABSTAIN: 1
AGAINST: 2

The Election Regulation Act is PASSED.

Great Eurussia Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:26 pm

Federation of Antanares wrote:Well, the time for election is finished. Wait for the final votes.

FOR: 7
ABSTAIN: 1
AGAINST: 2

The Election Regulation Act is PASSED.

Thank you to everyone who supported the bill.
What are you saying again Marquette? :-P

Europe and Asia Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:21 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Federation of Antanares wrote:Well, the time for election is finished. Wait for the final votes.

FOR: 7
ABSTAIN: 1
AGAINST: 2

The Election Regulation Act is PASSED.

Thank you to everyone who supported the bill.
What are you saying again Marquette? :-P

Couldn't help but gloat, eh?

Planitan Commonwealth Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:41 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Federation of Antanares wrote:Well, the time for election is finished. Wait for the final votes.

FOR: 7
ABSTAIN: 1
AGAINST: 2

The Election Regulation Act is PASSED.

Thank you to everyone who supported the bill.
What are you saying again Marquette? :-P

Couldn't help but gloat, eh?

-_-

Texania Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:51 am

BAD SPORTSMANSHIP. 5 YARD PENALTY.

Federation of Antanares Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:37 am

I invite everyone to leave the thread and to avoid any kind of provocations. This is a parliament.

Planitan Commonwealth Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:46 am

Good idea

Sponsored content