(Passed) Fashonia Neutral Intervention

New Tarajan wrote:New Tarajan does not agree with many provisions of this text.
While we commend the intention of giving to the Council the possibility to create a legal framework for international peacekeeping in Farshonia, it is not possible to avoid pointing out that the clauses about the WAAF, WAHO and DS&J, refers only to the Farshonian government.
In such a delicate situation, with many other forces (the secessionists) on the ground, this text would provide not for a neutral position of the WA forces, but for them standing alongside Farshonia. This fact could seriously undermine the peace process undergoing in the Astana Summit.
Thus, we request a re-formulation of the same clauses.

Also, I wish to make a small note: the ceasefire has been the result of international diplomacy, not of single-country diplomacy. Of course, mentioning this would aid other countries to accept the resolution of the Council as well.

Great Eurussia wrote:

New Tarajan wrote:New Tarajan does not agree with many provisions of this text.
While we commend the intention of giving to the Council the possibility to create a legal framework for international peacekeeping in Farshonia, it is not possible to avoid pointing out that the clauses about the WAAF, WAHO and DS&J, refers only to the Farshonian government.
In such a delicate situation, with many other forces (the secessionists) on the ground, this text would provide not for a neutral position of the WA forces, but for them standing alongside Farshonia. This fact could seriously undermine the peace process undergoing in the Astana Summit.
Thus, we request a re-formulation of the same clauses.

Also, I wish to make a small note: the ceasefire has been the result of international diplomacy, not of single-country diplomacy. Of course, mentioning this would aid other countries to accept the resolution of the Council as well.

It is very obvious, it says NEUTRAL. And it is clearly stated of finding a peaceful and amicable solution between Farshonia and the secessionist states. And there is nothing more to be concerned of as the status quo is already clear in the peace talks.

We need to be concerned of having these forces be deployed in Farshonia immediately before a problem between opposing side occurs that could spark another round of tensions that might escalate.

New Tarajan wrote:A quick deployment is of critical importance, of course; but this doesn't mean it must hapen at detriment of their efficacy, particularly if we think that there are already neutrale forces (New Tarajan, Dromoda) keeping  guarantee on the cease-fire.

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:Though I am not a member of the Council I am in full support of this bill.

Atletius wrote:It's seems WAAF neutrality Is insured by this so
FAVOUR

Atletius wrote:Reading this again, I worry about Section 2 in particular.
I would say the WAAF force should not aid the Farshonian Armed Forces, as they ultimately cannot be trusted to keep the peace, nor can any nations force that is Farshonia.
The WAAF should be the only Peacekeeping armed force in Farshonia.

Atletius wrote:Much better, though I would stress, like New Tarajan that ourselves and New Tarajan among others have been pushing for international action in particular WAAF intervention for some time, so the opening can be seen as quite un ingenuous

United States of Europe wrote:I am not a member of the Council of WA, however, as Secretary General of the regional organizations concerned, I have the duty to give advice and reassurance.

First, regional organizations armed (WAAF and WA-DSJ) will have the task of helping the security forces of Farshonia or secessionist states (forces that do not exist).
The organizations will be the only security forces responsible for maintaining law and order, security and stability.

Also,ll the nations that have already been deployed military contingents (New Tarajan, Dromoda, New Zealand, Atletius etc..) Have already expressed their support to the mission and openly cooperate with organizations, following the guidelines of the international intervention already in place.
I emphasize that many of these countries are also members of organizations.

So we fully support this bill, and reward for your approval as soon as possible, in order to ensure peace and security, and to bring relief to the people of Farshonia.

Art.1: The World Alliance, recognizing Farshonia, in all its parts, as subjected, under International Law and the fundamental principles of the WA Constitution, solely to the sovereign rights of its people, will thus not recognize any territorial acquisition made by a third power (defined as not part of the Farshonian Empire as previously to this crisis) in the Farshonian territory (defined as the territory hold by the Empire before the beginning of this crisis), no matter if done through the use of force or political and economical pressure and coercion.

Art. 2: In case of disintegration of the fundamental institutions in the Empire of Farshonia and in the secessionist territories, the World Alliance will be empowered of the management of the territories of the Empire of Farshonia, through the necessary WA Organizations, with the specific aim to create the ground for a rebirth of an independent government. The case for the implementation of this Article will be decided by the Council, which will manage it according to the WA Constitution, eventually after consultation with representatives of the Organizations on the field. In every case, the implementation of this Article will not undermine the application of Art. 1, which will keep its validity.

New Tarajan wrote:

Art.1: The World Alliance, recognizing Farshonia, in all its parts, as subjected, under International Law and the fundamental principles of the WA Constitution, solely to the sovereign rights of its people, will thus not recognize any territorial acquisition made by a third power (defined as not part of the Farshonian Empire as previously to this crisis) in the Farshonian territory (defined as the territory hold by the Empire before the beginning of this crisis), no matter if done through the use of force or political and economical pressure and coercion.

Art. 2: In case of disintegration of the fundamental institutions in the Empire of Farshonia and in the secessionist territories, the World Alliance will be empowered of the management of the territories of the Empire of Farshonia, through the necessary WA Organizations, with the specific aim to create the ground for a rebirth of an independent government. The case for the implementation of this Article will be decided by the Council, which will manage it according to the WA Constitution, eventually after consultation with representatives of the Organizations on the field. In every case, the implementation of this Article will not undermine the application of Art. 1, which will keep its validity.

New Tarajan wrote:Very well then.
About the other two modifications proposed?

Shirouma wrote:This annex to the proposal is a very good one New Tarajan, I'm also in favour if the the annex is added to the bill.