World Alliance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

(Passed) WASC Qualifications Act

+7
Serenarea
DPRNK
New Rhodinia
Kingdom of Ireland
Ebsotz
Shockwave
Great Eurussia
11 posters

Go down

(Passed) WASC Qualifications Act - Page 2 Empty Eurussian News

Post  Great Eurussia Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:36 am

Eurussia is in favor.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Passed) WASC Qualifications Act - Page 2 Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:52 am

Great Eurussia wrote:


WASC QUALIFICATIONS ACT
Authored by the Empire of Great Eurussia


This is a legislative RP/OOC proposal.


Seeing the series of cases being deliberated by the SC and no existing proposals aiming for the betterment of the WA are being discussed and as well as seeing the pending appointments to the WASC and using the same reasons as with Scottlands as to ensure that only qualified and reputable sovereign states will be able to be granted a prestigious seat at the SC and as well as to standardize the screening of candidate countries lessening the burden for the WA Presidency, we hereby proposes the World Alliance Security Council Qualifications Act.
Section 1) Sovereign states can be qualified to join the Security Council if they have met the conditions set forth by the existing international laws of the World Alliance particularly the WA Security Council Act and the succeeding provisions of this Act.
Section 2) Sovereign states may be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if they have stayed continuously in the World Alliance for not less than fourteen days.
Section 3) Sovereign states may be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if they are not sponsoring any form of terrorism or unprovoked aggression or state of war.
Section 4) Sovereign states may be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if more members of the WASC are supportive of their membership to the Security Council than those against their membership to the Security Council.
Section 5) Sovereign states may be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if they are not involved in any pending international cases in the Security Council.
Section 6) Sovereign states may be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if they are not proven intentionally guilty on international cases that constituted violations of the fundamental and basic law of the World Alliance, the WA Security Council Act.
Section 7) Sovereign states may not be eligible for candidacy for a seat at the Security Council, if they have been subjected to verdicts, negatively, arising from international cases, for five multiple times, while not a member state of the Security Council. And such number shall be reset if the concerned sovereign state has not been subjected to verdicts, in the negative way, and violating existing international laws intentionally, arising from international cases, within a period of six months.


This was derived from Scottland's proposal and we welcome suggestions.
This may be debated and revised within three (3) days.


With eight nations in favor and with one abstention, having garnered 88% approval of the WA Security Council, the WA Qualifications Act is now an international law.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum