(RYP) Royalist Party

This is the World Alliance Party for pro-monarchies like absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, principalities, and any other form of government that has king or queen, emperor or empress, duke or duchess, prince and princesses and have royal families.

President of the Royalist Party: Scottlands
Members of the Party: tba

Marscida submits its most sincere application to this party.

I would like to submit my application for this party.

Welcome!

Sure thing is that a leader of a party cannot be "away" for 3 days and 14 hours ('til now)

Not a word about those elections, our next steps, alliances, enemies or neither a word about world's kings...

A party needs a leader, Scottsland... and active one.

Marscida wrote:Welcome!

Sure thing is that a leader of a party cannot be "away" for 3 days and 14 hours ('til now)

Not a word about those elections, our next steps, alliances, enemies or neither a word about world's kings...

A party needs a leader, Scottsland... and active one.

Understandable of the rules and formality. But when RL problems face me, I must attend to the solution first, should I help you all in push such plans in motion. At least you can give me that.

I know, i know. There are everyday issues and problems

Is that i need "to do" and staying here waiting in unorganized state...

really hits me.

Anyway, i don't like playing "The most artful and honourable of activities " such is politics under the eyes of "colleagues".

Shall we redirect to NS telegrams?

I nominate Marscida as Party president.

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:I nominate Marscida as Party president.

I accept this appointment of yours with the most revered of behaviours.

Thank you for your faith, faith that will repay soon.

I know you can do more than me. I know we can grow under your leadership. Our next objective is to have a Royalist President! and a Royalist Security Council!

There is: an islamic party, making the interests of their religion; a Socialist party; a "american-repubblican" party, a royalist party and one, the Antebellum, making the interests of...nobody. Yet.

WHO aims to rapresent the conservative, traditionalist, non-socialist states?

The Royalist Party is the one that by RIGHT have to fights for THEIR rights.

As by logic and traditions, Royalists are traditionalists, conservative, sovereignists for their nations and unaligned, caring only for their peoples without differences.

This is why the RYP is the best choice of the unaligned ones.

Now... the HOW.

-The RYP wants total, supreme, uncontested sovereignity of action of any member of the WA; No more ingerences or menaces from other nations or religions.

-The RYP protects the traditions of the world and promotes their knowledge troughout the world as well as preservation of national-based religions.

-Promotes the activities of Royals and royalists within the WA, hoping to spread the good-governing that comes with a monarchic govt.


Miscellaneous: Surely, there must be an update concerning the "Members" and "president".

Also,

The logo needs an overhaul. Dark violet on dark-grey is... almost unseekable.

Also again,

If we change "name", we might REALLY get to attract un-royal ones that are, as we've seen, NOT rapresented by the actual political-presence.

Yes I am quite shocked in my last group I had 6 members I cant even garnish a glance from people in here.

West Phoenicia wrote:Yes I am quite shocked in my last group I had 6 members I cant even garnish a glance from people in here.

What do you mean with this?

Royalist Party is now a big big political party.

Big and with a real agenda.

All my plans are waiting for the answer of a "wise one" concerning laws and legislation of this region.

Assuming that (sadly) we'll be not the party i had in mind, we'll concentrate toward our specific vocation.

Being not in an exclusive-royals region, this makes things way different but there's a potential of electionism, sympathizers and actual royals that is satisfying. VERY satisfying.

Therefore... returning to point 1... let's wait a little while the answers i need comes.

__________________________________

Preparing next elections:

Who'll be candidate for Presidency and who for "membership"?

___________________________________

Party Logo.

Dark-violet on a gray. DARK gray forum is... unpractical.

I'll work on new logos. Both for my own fun and for the obtainment of a new, fresh, quick and clear one.
____________________________________

Of course, any question, suggestion or motion from you all is very appreciated.

6 votes for Scottsland, a great result, gentlemens.

Next time we all should be running for a seat, trying to beat the "a member per party" sort-of-balance.

Marscida wrote:6 votes for Scottsland, a great result, gentlemens.

Next time we all should be running for a seat, trying to beat the "a member per party" sort-of-balance.

Indeed. Thank you Marscida, we are on top!

It is not me, it's you that won.

Anyway

Things just got started: we don't need to grow, but to emprove. To be hungry of "numbers" just makes us a shadow. We got to emprove and then grow.

Numbers do nothing, ideals does.

And we HAVE ideals.

The strongest and most honourable of ideals!

__________

Also... the "questions" i've said to have made have been answered. And this is good. Very very good indeed.

Via telegram you will soon receive updates.

...to many eyes here. Sorry colleagues

The SDP wants to "pass over" by gather something from another party.

The SDP is socialist

An alliance with the Republicans is like mixing fire and water as one is the opposite of the other. An union will bring an internal war and two heads, one socialist and the other Republican, will re-emerge soon.

The Antebellum of West Phoenicia is to be considered with the RYP.

While an alliance/merging with the GIP will be even more hazardous: Socialists ideals are opposite to GIP agenda.

Anyway, even if such forced merging-alliance are made, immediately a right-wing coalition will raise to counter such move.

______

The RYP will keep its plans.

An alliance with the SSP is A functional idea. As for example, I wasn't in place on the throne by God, I was elected by the people just like how the next king will be elected by the people . The expenses of my kingdom cover Medicare, welfare, and education. Those are the three main expenses that a socialist country would most likely fund, an absolute monarch and leader by a one party government are the same thing; just different ideologies are shared . I for one supports the socialist Democratic party for branching out to other parties to find common ground, but that is just me.

The Antebellum Party will not consider an alliance if the Royalist Parties allies with Socialists.

West Phoenicia wrote:The Antebellum Party will not consider an alliance if the Royalist Parties allies with Socialists.

Fear not

I'm happy to see Marscida's leadership of the party that makes us more influential and well known!

Non Whether they like or not, Royalism is more romantic and intrresting then repubblicanism: people thinks of republics as messy beauticratic o
grey offices while the word "king" immediately transports to red, gold, jewels, good manners, pride and honor and also a deep, holy almost carnsl attachement to a nation or/and a dynasty.

This is why the RYP has potential.

And in that we must remember that Royalism is not lef...or righ... or center. As much as a king knows the best for its subjects, we royalists must do our best not to serve the party but the ideal.

https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t520p1020-wa-international-news-network#30002

Both RP wise and OOC wise, I just believe that this party is very opposite to what I wanted out of it. I'm not blaming anyone for this leave, its just that the ideals that are being said here is more "Right-Wing/Autocracy" then a interest party on "why does the WA need kings and queens in the world." So I take my leave wishing you only the best. Should we cross paths or be on opposite sides, I will silently acknowledge that we indeed worked together to find some common good.