(Dismissed) International Disputes Tribunal

Corralejo wrote:Corralejo thinks this will restrict the freedom states will have to discuss and resolve disputes themselves. We would not like to be forced to solve our disputes through an IDT when we can solve our problems ourselves. We do see the added value of such a tribunal but only on a voluntarily basis. Also, we doubt the independency of the tribunal (Article 4). We would rather see a different selection method when it comes to appointing judges, for example one judge from each nation taking part in the tribunal. In its current form, Corralejo does not support this proposal.

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:THE INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES TRIBUNAL OF WORLD ALLIANCE
Written by: Scottish Government

Article 1 states that all nation should discuss their dispute and not resort to war or intimidation or provocation. If they can, they must negotiate with the help of a mediatior party.

Article 2 states that if all nation in dispute whatever the dispute is fails to agree to anything that is acceptable to both parties, all nation in dispute can bring the dispute to the International Disputes Tribunal.

Article 3 states that the IDT must be fair at all times and hear both sides to be fair and equal. Any nation in dispute can ask for help of IDT to resolve the dispute.

Article 4 states that the IDT must have 3 judges named by President of World Alliance that has credibility and integrity. The judges will serve for 5 months and can be named again as judge if the President wants.

Article 5 All disputes resolved by IDT will be binding and enforceable to all nations in dispute because of the peace and fairness all aspires.

Corralejo wrote:Corralejo thinks this will restrict the freedom states will have to discuss and resolve disputes themselves. We would not like to be forced to solve our disputes through an IDT when we can solve our problems ourselves. We do see the added value of such a tribunal but only on a voluntarily basis. Also, we doubt the independency of the tribunal (Article 4). We would rather see a different selection method when it comes to appointing judges, for example one judge from each nation taking part in the tribunal. In its current form, Corralejo does not support this proposal.