(Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

* Pending - (8) - Scottlands, China China, Chivalry, Articmainia, DPRK, Ebsotz, Serenarea, MEU

           

* Yes - (6) - Xolox, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Snarfia, Zanland, Eurussia

* No - (0) -                    

* Abstain - (0) -                     


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

* Yes - (9) - Xolox, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Snarfia, Zanland, Eurussia, China, DPRK, Serenarea

* No - (0) -                    

* Abstain - (5) - Scottlands, Chivalry, Articmainia, Ebsotz, MEU

                    


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.