(Dismissed) Petition to Re-Open the Thread Closed by Scouting hastily

[I.S.I.S]

https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t918-discussion-closed-wasc-headquarters

[Shockwave]

Against.

You've nothing else to add but state that there's no reason. There's no reason to reopen it.

[UnitedStatesOfScouting]

~Edited, misread the thread.~

The discussion was opened by me and open for more than three days. There is no required course of action to close a discussion, if you wish to continue discussion you may do so in the new thread located here: https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t929-pending-relocate-the-wasc-chambers

[Kingdom of Scottlands]

I support this petition. The President did not consult other WASC when he immediately closed the thread about the WASC chambers relocation and submitted a proposal. I am totally against it because there was no alternative for Mneomsyn location that I am not for.

[Kingdom of Ireland]

I am against this as there seems to be no reason to do so. And how is this a petition?it's just a link

[Great Eurussia]

~Edited, misread the thread.~

The discussion was opened by me and open for more than three days. There is no required course of action to close a discussion, if you wish to continue discussion you may do so in the new thread located here: https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t929-pending-relocate-the-wasc-chambers

Eurussia supports the petition. We do not intend to see the simple matter of the headquarters of the Security Council become a thorny political issue among our fellow member states. The matter must be an acceptable consensus among all nation states of the world.

[Togana]

Against. This matter was open for discussion for some time and nations lost interest to post; and no other suggestions were brought to the table besides the one I proposed. If you are against this proposal then vote on the new page. If it wins with support then it go's into affect. if it loses then it can be discussed further.

[Sponsored content]