(Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
(Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Article VI ) The CouncilThe Council is the sole executive organ of the World Alliance composed of seven member states elected by the Parliament, from the Parliament itself, co-terminus with that Parliament subject to the confidence of that Parliament, whose member states will remain as member states of that Parliament as well. The Council can exercise any executive power at will unless otherwise prescribed by law and must be headed by the President elected by the body.
[size=45]The President cannot serve as Speaker at the same time and for successive terms.[/size]
Eurussia, as a responsible member of the WA Council, seeks the legal interpretation of the WA Court of Justice over the interpretation of Article VI of the WA Constitution with regards to the scenarios enumerated below:
1) Since the Council is elected as a whole, when a vacancy exists, can the Council allow to fill up the vacancy through those nations who joined the most recent Council election that wasn't able to gain enough votes to take a seat, which then, should fill the said vacancy?
2) Or if a vacancy exists, should the Council asks the Parliament to hold an election to fill up that vacancy? Since in anyway, the Council may be dissolved by the Parliament, at will, and eventually get re-elected anytime at the discretion of the Parliament?
Eurussia believes that the Constitution has granted the honourable tribunal the powers to interpret international laws particularly the Constitution itself. The aim of this resolution is to settle the legal hurdles to enable the important WA Council to fulfill its mandate with complete membership in accordance to the Constitution.
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
The Council needs to have vacancies filled by act of Parliament.
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Europe and Asia wrote:The Council needs to have vacancies filled by act of Parliament.
Can you make it more like of a formal verdict? So I could add this into the archives???
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Per the World Alliance Constitution, the Council is elected through Parliament by members of Parliament. Thus, the vacancies in the Council are to be filled by the still active members of parliament until this election cycle has passed and the entire region votes on the parties.
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Europe and Asia wrote:Per the World Alliance Constitution, the Council is elected through Parliament by members of Parliament. Thus, the vacancies in the Council are to be filled by the still active members of parliament until this election cycle has passed and the entire region votes on the parties.
Are these the consensus or majority decision of the whole Court of Justice?
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
That is the verdict.
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.
Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Great Eurussia wrote:Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.
Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?
No, it is not. Per Section 3, "
It is only the head of the court can speak in behalf of the entire court provided that they all agree privately but if there is none, it is up to the court who will lead in a proceedings."
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Europe and Asia wrote:Great Eurussia wrote:Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.
Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?
No, it is not. Per Section 3, "
It is only the head of the court can speak in behalf of the entire court provided that they all agree privately but if there is none, it is up to the court who will lead in a proceedings."
Please read Section 6 and Section 7.
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Yes, I've read them, and it says nowhere that they are required to state their opinion. The word "may" is used throughout. "May" doesn't mean "you have to." The other judges can post if or when they want to. Thank you.
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Europe and Asia wrote:Yes, I've read them, and it says nowhere that they are required to state their opinion. The word "may" is used throughout. "May" doesn't mean "you have to." The other judges can post if or when they want to. Thank you.
Thank you.
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
Is this case over?
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation
New Zealand, please change the title to "Concluded."
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Similar topics
» (Resolved) WASC Act Provisions Interpretation
» (Rejected) International Interventions Regulation Act
» (FULL) WA Regional News Network
» (Rejected) International Interventions Regulation Act
» (FULL) WA Regional News Network
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|