(Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
+5
England and Wales
Xolox
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Great Eurussia
Kingdom of Scottlands
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
(Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.
1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars
2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed
3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.
4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military
1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars
2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed
3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.
4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
NOTICE
Republic of Scottlands wrote:It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.
1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars
2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed
3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.
4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military
The proposal is open for three (3) days debate and amendments. Thereafter, a two (2) day vote will be called. Please be guided.
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
Republic of Scottlands wrote:It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.
1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars
2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed
3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.
4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military
1) I think that members of the Security Council may be in a war as long as:
- The Security Council Member does not provoke the war declaration from the opposition.
- The Opposition formally declares war against the WASC member.
2) I think that the WASC member for the region should mediate, but the countries at war have the right to request the full WASC to mediate, to ensure that favoritism cannot happen.
3) This point is rather pointless, as each embargo would have to be voted on individually anyway.
4) I can't really say I understand this one, a further explanation would be excellent.
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
4) I can't really say I understand this one, a further explanation would be excellent.
I think he means to make the aggressing state a puppet of WA while a new, less aggressive government can be formed in the country, under the WA's help. ( Probably similar to what happened to Germany after WWII. )
Anyway, Xolox is decidedly against this proposal.
England and Wales- Powerbroker
- Posts : 287
Join date : 2014-11-02
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
Would either of you like me to write a better version, minus #3 and #4?
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Would either of you like me to write a better version, minus #3 and #4?
Honestly I have a problem with all but #2. I can imagine some bad situations cropping up without the ability to declare war. Alone, #2 isn't really significant enough to pass as a law.
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
The United Kingdoms of Apepistan would like to express their disapproval of this act.
Apepistan- Regional Power
- Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
Let us improve the law not just go against it. Help me
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
Sorry lad, but to achieve peace we need to destroy the one not wanting it. AGAINST
Snarfian Federation- Regional Power
- Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
Republic of Scottlands wrote:Let us improve the law not just go against it. Help me
If you want support, maybe try to adress our qualms or modify the proposition according to them.
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
I'm against this
Azotakza- Powerbroker
- Posts : 136
Join date : 2014-11-01
Age : 28
Muchos Estados Unidos- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04
NOTICE
As the debate period lapsed, a vote is hereby called. The voting period will last for two (2) days and all uncast votes will be considered abstentions.
So far the STATUS OF VOTES are:
* Pending - (10) - Eurussia, China China, New Rhodinia, Chivalry, Articmainia, Zanland, Ebsotz, Scottlands, North Korreaa, Serenarea
* Yes - (1) - Muchos Estados Unidos
* No - (3) - Xolox, Scouting, Snarfia* Abstain - (0) -
* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.
Eurussian Vote
Eurussia officially abstains. We support the initiative, however, the provisions are open for abuse and could violate the sovereignty of nations.
Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act
We are for peace, so we are FOR.
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
NOTICE
The STATUS OF VOTES are:
* Yes - (3) - Muchos Estados Unidos, China China, Scottlands
* No - (3) - Xolox, Scouting, Snarfia* Abstain - (8) - Eurussia, New Rhodinia, Chivalry, Articmainia, Zanland, Ebsotz, North Korreaa, Serenarea
* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.
The proposal is dismissed.
Similar topics
» (Dismissed) Anti-Imperialist Act
» (Dismissed) World Peace Act
» (Dismissed) WASC Brokered Artite-China Peace Talks
» WA Anti-Piracy Act
» WA Anti-Terrorism Act
» (Dismissed) World Peace Act
» (Dismissed) WASC Brokered Artite-China Peace Talks
» WA Anti-Piracy Act
» WA Anti-Terrorism Act
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum