World Alliance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
World Alliance

Official Forum


(Dismissed) World Peace Act

5 posters

World Alliance :: WORLD ALLIANCE SECURITY COUNCIL :: Dismissed Legislations

Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:29 am

The United States of Muchos Estados Unidos proposes that to promote peace, nations of the Security Council should not initiate a war but can only act in defense. If nations of the Security Council initiates a war, that nation must be remove from the Security Council.


Please support
Muchos Estados Unidos
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Xolox Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:34 am

Xolox is not in favor. In some extreme instances, war is the only viable solution to a conflict.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Zanlandian News

Post  Zanland Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:35 am

Zanland doesn't support this.
Zanland
Zanland
Emerging Powerbroker

Posts : 85
Join date : 2014-09-05
Location : United States

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Thu Sep 11, 2014 1:15 pm

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:The United States of Muchos Estados Unidos proposes that to promote peace, nations of the Security Council should not initiate a war but can only act in defense. If nations of the Security Council initiates a war, that nation must be remove from the Security Council.


Please support


The Eurussian Government supports the initiative of the Estados Unidos Government as it is in line with our international principle of the right of nations to exercise self defense. And we beg to disagree with the position of the Xolox Government that war is sometimes the only viable solution to a conflict, as we believe that there is always a door for peaceful diplomacy.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Great Eurussia Thu Sep 11, 2014 6:53 pm

China China wrote:The People's Republic of China China requests the Great EUrussia to remove Empire of Articmainia from Security Council because of attacking China China

Proof - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t520p345-world-alliance-international-news-network#22247

As the Acting President of the Security Council, I will create a thread for this issue as this thread is solely for the proposed 'World Peace Act' only. Thank you.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Great Eurussia Thu Sep 11, 2014 7:00 pm

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:The United States of Muchos Estados Unidos proposes that to promote peace, nations of the Security Council should not initiate a war but can only act in defense. If nations of the Security Council initiates a war, that nation must be remove from the Security Council.


Please support

This proposal is open for revisions for two (2) days. There after, a vote will be called on the council. Thank you.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:31 pm

Favor
Muchos Estados Unidos
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:39 pm

The proposal is open for two (2) days debate and amendments. Thereafter, a vote will be called.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:33 pm

The debate period has lapsed. Hence, a vote is now called to order.


So far there are one (1) vote in favor and two (2) votes against. We need five (5) more votes to bring the proposal into law.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Eurussian Vote

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:34 pm

Eurussia is in favor.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Snarfian Federation Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:04 pm

favor
Snarfian Federation
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:58 am

So far there are three (3) votes in favor and two (2) votes against. There are still four (4) more votes pending votes. Hence, the voting will be closed in one (1) day and all uncast votes will be considered as abstentions.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:34 pm

Favor
Muchos Estados Unidos
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:24 am

With 5 votes in favor and 2 votes against and 2 abstentions, the proposal failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to pass the proposal into law.

Hence, the proposal is hereby dismissed.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Xolox Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:26 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
With 5 votes in favor and 2 votes against and 2 abstentions, the proposal failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to pass the proposal into law.
Hence, the proposal is hereby dismissed.

Is 66% or 75% percent required? 6 out of 9 would be 2/3rd but earlier you said it was 3/4ths.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Great Eurussia Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:28 am

Xolox wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
With 5 votes in favor and 2 votes against and 2 abstentions, the proposal failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to pass the proposal into law.
Hence, the proposal is hereby dismissed.

Is 66% or 75% percent required? 6 out of 9 would be 2/3rd but earlier you said it was 3/4ths.

The 75% of '9' is 6.5, hence we cannot go in between. So we would only require 6 votes.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Xolox Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:30 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Xolox wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
With 5 votes in favor and 2 votes against and 2 abstentions, the proposal failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to pass the proposal into law.
Hence, the proposal is hereby dismissed.

Is 66% or 75% percent required? 6 out of 9 would be 2/3rd but earlier you said it was 3/4ths.

The 75% of '9' is 6.5, hence we cannot go in between. So we would only require 6 votes.

Oh okay, I had assumed we would round up to 7. I understand now.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Great Eurussia Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:31 am

Xolox wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Xolox wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
With 5 votes in favor and 2 votes against and 2 abstentions, the proposal failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to pass the proposal into law.
Hence, the proposal is hereby dismissed.

Is 66% or 75% percent required? 6 out of 9 would be 2/3rd but earlier you said it was 3/4ths.

The 75% of '9' is 6.5, hence we cannot go in between. So we would only require 6 votes.

Oh okay, I had assumed we would round up to 7. I understand now.

Yeah and I think it will be unfair if we round it off since it will be equivalent to exactly 1 vote.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) World Peace Act Empty Re: (Dismissed) World Peace Act

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

World Alliance :: WORLD ALLIANCE SECURITY COUNCIL :: Dismissed Legislations

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum