(Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
+5
Kingdom of Ireland
New Rhodinia
Kingdom of Scottlands
Great Eurussia
UnitedStatesOfScouting
9 posters
Page 1 of 1
(Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
As a WASC Member, I am requesting that the President of the WASC immediately dismiss the following members of the WASC for the following reasons:
Serenarea - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Zanland - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Chivalry - (Based off my Lawsuit)
New Korea - (Based off my Lawsuit) + The fact that they have no further RP reason left to be dealing with WASC affairs.
China China - Has little to no concept of what legislation is being proposed.
The World Alliance Security Act allows the President of the WASC to immediately dismiss any member of the Security Council for any reason:
"can also be removed by the WASC, for any grounds, at anytime and at will."
Serenarea - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Zanland - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Chivalry - (Based off my Lawsuit)
New Korea - (Based off my Lawsuit) + The fact that they have no further RP reason left to be dealing with WASC affairs.
China China - Has little to no concept of what legislation is being proposed.
The World Alliance Security Act allows the President of the WASC to immediately dismiss any member of the Security Council for any reason:
"can also be removed by the WASC, for any grounds, at anytime and at will."
Signed,
Jeb Bush
President of the United States of Scouting
Jeb Bush
President of the United States of Scouting
Last edited by UnitedStatesOfScouting on Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:30 am; edited 1 time in total
NOTICE
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:As a WASC Member, I am requesting that the President of the WASC immediately dismiss the following members of the WASC for the following reasons:
Serenarea - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Zanland - (Based off my Lawsuit)
Chivalry - (Based off my Lawsuit)
New Korea - (Based off my Lawsuit) + The fact that they have no further RP reason left to be dealing with WASC affairs.
China China - Has little to no concept of what legislation is being proposed.
The World Alliance Security Act allows the President of the WASC to immediately dismiss any member of the Security Council for any reason:
"can also be removed by the WASC, for any grounds, at anytime and at will."Signed,
Jeb Bush
President of the United States of Scouting
The Security Council may debate/vote on this executive proposal within five (5) days. And by virtue of the WA Security Council Act, the concerned nations, Serenarea, Zanland, Chivalry, New Korrea, and China China are prohibited from voting on this proposal due to conflict of interest being they are involved on the request.
Only nine (9) votes of in favor are required to give effect to the removal of each concerned nation to the involved nation being barred from voting concerning his own issues. And due to several WASC member states involved, it is adviced that the following format be followed for organization.
A) Serenarea - Yes / No / Abstain?
B) Zanland - Yes / No / Abstain?
C) Chivalry - Yes / No / Abstain?
D) New Korrea - Yes / No / Abstain?
E) China China - Yes / No / Abstain?
NOTE: Serenarea can't vote for A but could for B to E; Zanland can't vote for B but could for A, C to E; Chivalry can't vote for C but could for A to B, D to E; New Korrea can't vote for D but could for A to C, E; and China China can't vote for E but could for A to D.
The Eurussian Government believes that the power to remove a member state from the Security Council does not lie on the Presidency alone but the whole Security Council collectively. Thank you.
Last edited by Great Eurussia on Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Eurussian Vote
A) Serenarea -
B) Zanland -
C) Chivalry -
D) New Korrea -
E) China China -
The Eurussian Government may change it vote if any nation affected requests for its reconsideration.
Last edited by Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 30, 2015 3:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
A) Serenarea - No
B) Zanland - Yes
C) Chivalry - Abstain
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Yes
New Rhodinia- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
A) Serenarea - Yes
B) Zanland - Abstain
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Yes
B) Zanland - Abstain
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Yes
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
A) Serenarea - Yes
B) Zanland - Yes
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Yes
B) Zanland - Yes
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Yes
Kingdom of Ireland- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 387
Join date : 2014-09-06
Age : 24
Location : Georgia,USA
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
It is good to see everyone voting.
The Holy Empire of Artite- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain
You're the reason why the WASC gets nothing done.
The Holy Empire of Artite- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain
You're the reason why the WASC gets nothing done.
One of the....
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
B) Zanland - Abstain
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Yes
E) China China - Abstain
Last edited by Serenarea on Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Serenarea- Powerbroker
- Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03
Re: (Dismissed) Remove Serenarea, New Korea, Chivalry, Zanland, China China
A) Serenarea - No
B) Zanland - No
C) Chivalry - No
D) New Korrea - Abstain
E) China China - Yes
B) Zanland - No
C) Chivalry - No
D) New Korrea - Abstain
E) China China - Yes
Snarfian Federation- Regional Power
- Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
Eurussian Vote
Great Eurussia wrote:A) Serenarea - YesB) Zanland - AbstainC) Chivalry - YesD) New Korrea - YesE) China China - YesThe Eurussian Government may change it vote if any nation affected requests for its reconsideration.
Following the signing of the Korrean Peace Treaty and the official visit of the Premier of the People's Republic of China China, Eurussia changes its vote.
A) Serenarea - Yes
B) Zanland - Abstain
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Abstain
E) China China - Abstain
B) Zanland - Abstain
C) Chivalry - Yes
D) New Korrea - Abstain
E) China China - Abstain
NOTICE
Pursuant to the "Emergency Measure on WASC Act Amendment" (Or more commonly known as) "WA Voting Reforms Act", which has reformed the "World Alliance Security Council Act", these voting guidelines now take effect as passed into law on 1/30/2015 at 1:31 AM (GMT-5).
"Section 3 - Functions
The WASC shall have the de facto supranational powers over the executive, legislative, and judicial matters in the WA which shall be enforced through a sixty six percent or two thirds concurrence of all its voting member states."
Therefore, the vote standings are at:
Serenarea - 3/6 (50%) --> (-1 from tally, because Serenarea cannot vote on itself)
Zanland - 2/7 (29%)
Chivalry - 4/7 (57%)
New Korrea - 4/7 (57%)
China China - 4/7 (57%)
At this time, none of the persons on the list can be voted out unless votes are changed or new votes arise.
"Section 3 - Functions
The WASC shall have the de facto supranational powers over the executive, legislative, and judicial matters in the WA which shall be enforced through a sixty six percent or two thirds concurrence of all its voting member states."
Therefore, the vote standings are at:
Serenarea - 3/6 (50%) --> (-1 from tally, because Serenarea cannot vote on itself)
Zanland - 2/7 (29%)
Chivalry - 4/7 (57%)
New Korrea - 4/7 (57%)
China China - 4/7 (57%)
At this time, none of the persons on the list can be voted out unless votes are changed or new votes arise.
NOTICE
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Therefore, the vote standings are at:
Serenarea - 3/6 (50%) --> (-1 from tally, because Serenarea cannot vote on itself)
Zanland - 2/7 (29%)
Chivalry - 4/7 (57%)
New Korrea - 4/7 (57%)
China China - 4/7 (57%)
At this time, none of the persons on the list can be voted out unless votes are changed or new votes arise.
Citing no change above, this proposal is hereby dismissed.
Similar topics
» (Dismissed) Request to Remove New Korreaa
» (Dismissed) Sanctions on North Korreaa, Artite, China China
» (Dismissed) Xolox Claim to China China's Land
» (Dismissed) Request to Dismiss New Korea
» (Dismissed) Request to Remove New Korrea
» (Dismissed) Sanctions on North Korreaa, Artite, China China
» (Dismissed) Xolox Claim to China China's Land
» (Dismissed) Request to Dismiss New Korea
» (Dismissed) Request to Remove New Korrea
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum