(Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
+6
Serenarea
Shockwave
Great Eurussia
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Xolox
Muchos Estados Unidos
10 posters
Page 1 of 1
(Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
I am asking WASC to ban Xolox from Security Council because of his declaration of war. He do not deserve to be in WASC, he is a plain war maker. He is even involved recently with a fight with Scouting over the Vice President seat.
Muchos Estados Unidos- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.
I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.
Muchos Estados Unidos- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.
I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.
I am not declaring war for any of those reasons. I am declaring war because I was called into doing so by multiple alliances.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Xolox wrote:Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.
I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.
I am not declaring war for any of those reasons. I am declaring war because I was called into doing so by multiple alliances.
It is the same thing. Don't make pitiful excuses.
Muchos Estados Unidos- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Please clarify if your intentions were to remove Xolox from the WASC or to ban him from returning?
Eurussian Position
The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.
If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.
We will notify the council for any change of vote.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Great Eurussia wrote:The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.We will notify the council for any change of vote.
May I ask what exactly you're voting on here? It still hasn't been clarified of what intentions this proposal holds, hence technically the discussion/voting phase hasn't been opened until that can be cleared up.
Eurussian Clarification
Great Eurussia wrote:The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.We will notify the council for any change of vote.
The same stance applies to Muchos Estados Unidos.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Great Eurussia wrote:The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.We will notify the council for any change of vote.
May I ask what exactly you're voting on here? It still hasn't been clarified of what intentions this proposal holds, hence technically the discussion/voting phase hasn't been opened until that can be cleared up.
We can clearly see the intentions of the proposal.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Hey MEU, do you know who else declared war on you? Me, Artite, Xolox,
Same with you Korea.
Don't just pin it on Xolox. How about you accept your responsibilities and go along with this conflict. Do nations IRL stop and think *oh yah we did violate that rule* no, it's war, they could care less.
Same with you Korea.
Don't just pin it on Xolox. How about you accept your responsibilities and go along with this conflict. Do nations IRL stop and think *oh yah we did violate that rule* no, it's war, they could care less.
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
NOTICE
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:I am asking WASC to ban Xolox from Security Council because of his declaration of war. He do not deserve to be in WASC, he is a plain war maker. He is even involved recently with a fight with Scouting over the Vice President seat.
This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Wirbanskia is Against
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Serenarea is AGAINST.
Serenarea- Powerbroker
- Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03
Snarfian Federation- Regional Power
- Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
New Rhodinia is also against this. First, Xolox is indeed not on the WASC so this ban from the WASC is entirely pointless already. Second, from what I can see, this is another reactionary response to Xolox's attack in an attempt to undermine his political presence. Just because a nation declares war on you, doesn't mean you can vote to take away all of their political freedoms in the World Alliance.
New Rhodinia- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22
DPRNK- Regional Power
- Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17
Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox
Scottish Republic will abstain because of our neutrality.
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
NOTICE
With an overwhelming amount of against votes, it's clear that this resolution failed. Dismissed.
Similar topics
» (Dismissed) WASC Seat Request of IS of IS
» (Dismissed) Legal Clarification Request to the WASC
» (Dismissed) Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox
» (Dismissed) New Korrea vs Xolox
» (Dismissed) Xolox vs New Korrea
» (Dismissed) Legal Clarification Request to the WASC
» (Dismissed) Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox
» (Dismissed) New Korrea vs Xolox
» (Dismissed) Xolox vs New Korrea
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum