(Dismissed) Respect of Religions Law

Marscida wrote:My personal refinement to this proposal

__________________________________________________
Religious Respect Law

-A law that promotes freedom of Religion-

Preamble: Aknowledging the non-universality of a single religion and the existance of countless beliefs, sects, religions, movements et cetera, the World Alliance recognizes the right of the free individual to choose in which religion believe and partake in said religion rituals and lithurgies.

Art. I: Of Gods and choices
a) This act states the freedom of religion. Nobody should be forced to believe in a God or in another.
b) The act promotes common sense and peaceful behaviours within nations and cultures.

Art. II: Of sovereignty and ordinances
a) Acknowledging Art. I, no individual shall be forced to believe in a "something" that is not of his/her direct choice of life. This act, anyway do not regulate States of this region called World Alliance as each and every one of the States that compose this community is free, sovereign and Independent in its legislation and law.
b) Therefore, as written in Art. II comma "a", the act applies only to single individuals. Nations shall regulate religions as they deem necessary for their subjects, interests and priorities such as traditions and various God's will.
c) Nations that forces, coerces, order, supports and encourage, enacts mobbing and menaces other nations to submit to particular religious/cultural acts (To build a religious school) shall be found in violation of Art. II comma "a" and "b".

________________________________________________________

This is how you do laws

Marscida wrote:My personal refinement to this proposal

__________________________________________________
Religious Respect Law

-A law that promotes freedom of Religion-

Preamble: Aknowledging the non-universality of a single religion and the existance of countless beliefs, sects, religions, movements et cetera, the World Alliance recognizes the right of the free individual to choose in which religion believe and partake in said religion rituals and lithurgies.

Art. I: Of Gods and choices
a) This act states the freedom of religion. Nobody should be forced to believe in a God or in another.
b) The act promotes common sense and peaceful behaviours within nations and cultures.

Art. II: Of sovereignity and ordinances
a) Aknowledging Art. I, no individual shall be forced to believe in a "something" that is not of his/her direct choice of life. This act, anyway do not regulate States of this region called World Alliance as each and every one of the States that compose this community is free, sovereign and Independent in its legislation and law.
b) Therefore, as written in Art. II comma "a", the act applies only to single individuals. Nations shall regulate religions as they deem necessary for their subjects, interests and priorities such as traditions and various God's will.
c) Nations that forces, coherces, order, supports and encourage, enacts mobbing and menaces other nations to submit to particular religious/cultural acts (To build a religious school) shall be found in violation of Art. II comma "a" and "b".

________________________________________________________

This is how you do laws

I.S.I.S wrote:The Respect of Religions Law

It is proposed that everyone is entitled to a religion. And all country is required to respect all religions and exercise freedom to exercise that free choice to choose a religion. It could be christianity, orthodox, anglican, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam and others. No local ordinance must be allowed if it contradicts the Respect of Religions Law.

I.S.I.S wrote:The Respect of Religions Law

It is proposed that everyone is entitled to a religion. And all country is required to respect all religions and exercise freedom to exercise that free choice to choose a religion. It could be christianity, orthodox, anglican, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam and others. No local ordinance must be allowed if it contradicts the Respect of Religions Law.

Marscida wrote:My personal refinement to this proposal

__________________________________________________
Religious Respect Law

-A law that promotes freedom of Religion-

Preamble: Aknowledging the non-universality of a single religion and the existance of countless beliefs, sects, religions, movements et cetera, the World Alliance recognizes the right of the free individual to choose in which religion believe and partake in said religion rituals and lithurgies.

Art. I: Of Gods and choices
a) This act states the freedom of religion. Nobody should be forced to believe in a God or in another.
b) The act promotes common sense and peaceful behaviours within nations and cultures.

Art. II: Of sovereignity and ordinances
a) Aknowledging Art. I, no individual shall be forced to believe in a "something" that is not of his/her direct choice of life. This act, anyway do not regulate States of this region called World Alliance as each and every one of the States that compose this community is free, sovereign and Independent in its legislation and law.
b) Therefore, as written in Art. II comma "a", the act applies only to single individuals. Nations shall regulate religions as they deem necessary for their subjects, interests and priorities such as traditions and various God's will.
c) Nations that forces, coherces, order, supports and encourage, enacts mobbing and menaces other nations to submit to particular religious/cultural acts (To build a religious school) shall be found in violation of Art. II comma "a" and "b".

________________________________________________________

This is how you do laws

Marscida wrote:Marscida rejects this act and will fight against this.

And Marscida will keep ordinances and regulations in order to regulate religions, their followers and anything else.

It is not business of the WA to deprive single member nations of their holy independence and freedom of action just to allow, throught legislative way, what ISIS could not have had achieved on its own.

Religion is personal.
And persons refers to their nation.

REPEAL this act to allow true freedom of religion.

I.S.I.S wrote:The Respect of Religions Law

It is proposed that everyone is entitled to a religion. And all country is required to respect all religions and exercise freedom to exercise that free choice to choose a religion. It could be christianity, orthodox, anglican, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam and others. No local ordinance must be allowed if it contradicts the Respect of Religions Law.

Marscida wrote:I call for a STOP.

ISIS, the proposer, is 5 days absent. Even if politics cannot stop (or shouldn't stop), it is unfair to make everything without even hearing other thesis PRO or CONTRO this act from the proposer. Also... my "refinement" was meant not as different but as rewritement of the same act in the hope that ISIS itself could find it acceptable.

Unless non-WA delegates must shut up even in non-decisional things...

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Marscida wrote:I call for a STOP.

ISIS, the proposer, is 5 days absent. Even if politics cannot stop (or shouldn't stop), it is unfair to make everything without even hearing other thesis PRO or CONTRO this act from the proposer. Also... my "refinement" was meant not as different but as rewritement of the same act in the hope that ISIS itself could find it acceptable.

Unless non-WA delegates must shut up even in non-decisional things...

It's up to the WASC member to be awake at their own proposal's hearing. Once a proposal is set in motion, there's nothing in the law stating that a proposal can be stopped. As for your comment in the restricted section, I'll sustain it.

Marscida wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Marscida wrote:I call for a STOP.

ISIS, the proposer, is 5 days absent. Even if politics cannot stop (or shouldn't stop), it is unfair to make everything without even hearing other thesis PRO or CONTRO this act from the proposer. Also... my "refinement" was meant not as different but as rewritement of the same act in the hope that ISIS itself could find it acceptable.

Unless non-WA delegates must shut up even in non-decisional things...

It's up to the WASC member to be awake at their own proposal's hearing. Once a proposal is set in motion, there's nothing in the law stating that a proposal can be stopped. As for your comment in the restricted section, I'll sustain it.

..can a thing that is not illegal... be illegal? No writing makes it non subject to law, unless a law foresees it. Therefore...technically, to sto the debate is neither illegal nor useable... so if stops, nothing can be done as is not a crime.

Also...
you sustain my comment: ...Meaning that we have to shut up or we are de-shutuppized?