Re: (Dismissed) Vendoland vs WA

Zakiristan. Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:35 pm

vendoland wrote:
CONSTITUTIONAL RE-RATIFICATION REFERENDUM
There are currently 30 registered users on this forum. There are five that need to be excluded from the list:

Unibot (foreign representative)
Zakiristan (left the region)
Bulgaars (puppet)
Shambhala Sangha (left the region)
Byzantium Novum (left the region)

That makes 25 registered nations of the World Alliance here on the forums. Being that the Constitution itself stipulates it shall only be passed if it receives a supermajority of the votes, 17 votes will be required for ratification.

I AM BACK AND VOTE YES

Vendoland Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:12 pm

CONSTITUTIONAL RE-RATIFICATION REFERENDUM

VOTES FOR
Vendoland
Unovia
United States of Europe
Schorr
New-Zealand
Zakiristan
Browera

VOTES AGAINST
Aloia
Huperzia
Novo Canuckia

16 nations have yet to vote

Because Zakiristan has returned, the vote will now be out of 26 nations. The threshold for supermajority is now 18 out of 26.

11 more votes to supermajority.

Chelm Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:24 am

Chelm votes yes.

Türkiye Fri Mar 01, 2013 5:21 pm

Turkiye votes no

Vendoland Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:05 am

CONSTITUTIONAL RE-RATIFICATION REFERENDUM

VOTES FOR
Vendoland
Unovia
United States of Europe
Schorr
New-Zealand
Zakiristan
Browera
Chelm

VOTES AGAINST
Aloia
Huperzia
Novo Canuckia
Turkiye Federal Republic

14 nations have yet to vote

10 more votes to supermajority

New-Zealand Sat Mar 02, 2013 8:17 am

can I change my vote to NO, I just remembered all the flaws with the constitution.

Great Eurussia Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:11 am

OOC: Since we have no rules YET on judicial procedures and to properly guide everyone especially the Court of Justice on the standard protocol on justice systems around the world especially since we are all dealing with each other here as SOVEREIGN STATES, the following principles of justice must be observed:

Principle 1
If a state charges the regional government or any of its laws thereof, the country holding the presidency of the region shall be automatically compelled to stand in court and the case will proceed whether any of the two parties participate or not.

But if a state charges another state, both must agree to be arbitrated and the court cannot force any state to participate or else the case will never push through.

Principle 2
Only the parties involved in a case can present and debate with each other and no one else unless otherwise both parties agree to invite a third party to join.

Principle 3
It is only the head of the court can speak in behalf of the entire court provided that they all agree privately but if there is none, it is up to the court who will lead in a proceedings.

Principle 4
Any member of the court has no right, if he wish to destroy his credibility, to declare or state his opinions in a proceeding. But he can always ask any party any question.

Principle 5
It is always the prosecuting party, the one who started the charges, who should present all his arguments and evidences first. After such the defending party do its part. From then they could debate with each other until their exhaustion.

Principle 6
Before the court decides on a case, the presiding justice must first ask all parties if they are done presenting all their arguments and their evidences. The prosecuting must reply first and the defending party follows. After this, no one else can present their side anymore.

If so, the members of the court can now start reviewing everything and each of them can now publicly state their opinion and reasons for reaching whatever their decision.

Principle 7
When deciding on a case, the presiding justice is the last to issue his decision and summarize all the other justices opinions, from there a decision is now reached.

From here, any party has the right to file a motion for consideration. One move for the prosecuting party and one move for the defending party, whichever which. Any motion must be heard by the court and open the floor again for arguments.

Principle 8
During a motion for reconsideration, all parties will be asked if they are done presenting all their arguments and evidences. If so, the court can now issue their decision again and the presiding justice will be the last to do so and summarize everything.

In this level of the case, the decision is final and executory.

This is the standard protocol of all courts in the world, if they are democratic. Since we are dealing with each other as sovereign states everyone must be properly notified. If you think any of this principles are wrong, feel free to research the UN or the ICJ, feel free to pass a law on judicial procedure, or even feel free to propose a constitutional amendment :-)

Great Eurussia Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:39 pm

OOC: As the nation directly involved in this case has voluntarily withdrew from the region, this case is considered dismissed. Unless otherwise, refuted by the Court

Sponsored content