World Alliance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

5 posters

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:49 am



EURUSSIA vs NEW TARAJAN
NOTE: This is a purely and an absolutely roleplay case.
The Empire of Great Eurussia being aggrieved by the Kingdom of New Tarajan seeks the legal intervention of the honourable World Alliance Court of Justice as the latter deployed a fleet of navy vessels in our sovereign territory of the Duchy of Orenburg, located in the Mnemosyne Continent, and imposed naval blockade that causes fears among the peace loving populace and thousands of tourists in the duchy, disruptions on domestic and international flights, delays in ferry services with nearby countries, and causing billions of euros of loss on local economy due to the troubles the blockade is causing to our sovereign territory.
In our belief, the Empire of Great Eurussia, as enshrined in Article 2 of the WA Constitution, that our country has the right to exist, right to self defense (with which we refuse to exercise to maintain world peace), right to express opinion, right to self determination, and most importantly, right to exercise sovereignty and independence
(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Orenburg
In our belief, the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, doesn't have the right, in whatever grounds nor reasons, to violate the above mentioned internationally recognized and constitutionally protected rights of the Empire of Great Eurussia in anyway. However, our government instead of resorting to the use of force with which it can do at will, has opted instead to come before this honourable WA Court of Justice, serving as an example to the international community, to confirm that the naval blockade unilaterally imposed by the aggressor does violates our rights as it has been imposed without our consent.
How? Our right to exist is being violated as the naval blockade of the Kingdom of New Tarajan, the aggressor, serves as an invading force to the Duchy of Orenburg. Our right to self determination, as the naval blockade was unilaterally imposed by the aggressor was done without our explicit consent as the sovereign power over the Duchy of Orenburg. Our right to exercise sovereignty and independence, as the naval blockade unilaterally imposed by the aggressor serves as an invading force that could anytime invade our sovereign territory that could spark a war of unimaginable scale, in which Eurussia, as the aggrieved party and as a peace loving nation wishes to avoid, at all cost.
https://2img.net/h/s15.postimg.cc/5d43yy6kb/image.png
https://2img.net/h/s2.postimg.cc/k4ad75fnd/image.png
https://2img.net/h/s21.postimg.cc/7li8mrubb/image.png
https://2img.net/h/s23.postimg.cc/r3vq4xbzf/image.png
Therefore, the Empire of Great Eurussia, respectfully asks the honourable WA Court of Justice, as the sole international judicial organ of the world as enshrined in Article 7 of the WA Constitution, as the a branch of the WA Government with supranational authority in the world as enshrined in Article 1 of the WA Constitution, and most importantly, as tasked by the WA Constitution itself to maintain peace, security, and stability in the world as enshrined in Article 1 of the WA Constitution, to order the Kingdom of New Tarajan to withdraw its naval blockade over our sovereign territory of the Duchy of Orenburg.
And it is also our desire to ensure the effective implementation of your honourable order, our government also requests the WA Court of Justice to order the WA Police Force, WA Space Defense Agency, the WA Armed Forces, and the WA Humanitarian Organization, as international arm of the WA Government, in which the Court is part thereof, to implement the aforementioned request of withdrawal of the illegal and irresponsible naval blockade of the Kingdom of New Tarajan over our sovereign territory of the Duchy of Orenburg.
Eurussia respectfully submits the resolution of this Case before this Court.


Last edited by Great Eurussia on Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:18 am; edited 1 time in total
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Guest Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:13 am

I support Eurussia in this conflict. New Tarajan is pushing Eurussia around and telling them to do as he says like they're his puppet. This is thurely inappropriate and only makes Stirvas president Joanes Gartev to look at New Tarajan with disgust and with one simple definition of the nations government. "A Bully". Therefore if this were to escalate into war Stirva would declare war on New Tarajan and join sides with Eurussia.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:17 am

Our government will not comment the unuseful and not-requested comments of the Stirvan government. This is not the place for such exploits, and, for the moment, we will try to not answer to their insults to our reputation.

So said, the Federal Aristocratic Kingdom of New Tarajan accepts to give the case under the jurisdiction of this Court, since we always supported the development and the respect of International Law. Under request of the honourable members of the Court, we are ready to provide any possible explanation and clarification for our acts.
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Guest Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:21 am

New Tarajan wrote:Our government will not comment the unuseful and not-requested comments of the Stirvan government. This is not the place for such exploits, and, for the moment, we will try to not answer to their insults to our reputation.

So said, the Federal Aristocratic Kingdom of New Tarajan accepts to give the case under the jurisdiction of this Court, since we always supported the development and the respect of International Law. Under request of the honourable members of the Court, we are ready to provide any possible explanation and clarification for our acts.
We shall not speak of this any further and let the council consider what is to be done.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Ivania Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:49 am

Just as any coin there is two sides, we have heard EuRussia's now we await New Tarajan's views on the matter and to see things from their perspective.
Ivania
Ivania
Powerbroker

Posts : 126
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : California

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New-Zealand Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:17 pm

I thought the COJ was purely OOC...
New-Zealand
New-Zealand
Emerging Power

Posts : 973
Join date : 2013-02-04
Location : New Zealand

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=new-zealand

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:09 pm

New-Zealand wrote:I thought the COJ was purely OOC...
OOC: Sincerely...I don't know...


Your Excellencies, honourable judges of the Court, we are ready to provide our defense.
First of all, it is necessary to recall to the attention of this Court a beirf summary of the past events that caused a breakdown between New Tarajan and Eurussia. Why recalling them? For the simple reason that they are, effectively, a basis for what happened now, contributing to the decision of our government.
Everybody knows what happened during the Koryan War, and how our two governments found themselves on the opposite sides of a law dispute about the extradiction of former dictator Kim Jong-Un. However, many other events happened after, which contributed to a deep mistrusts of our government toward Moscow intentions, such as rhe unjustified order, for our citizens living in Eurussia, to leave the country (while we refused to take such a decision, which could only harm innocent civilians) during the abovementioned crisis, or the continuous series of insults from Eurussia, also directed against the sister of the King, Princess Elise Angelique Van Vinkel, a thing extremely serious in the view of Tarajani culture. But let's move forward.
Eurussia began to literally ignore us, an highly offensive behavior, especially during the Snarfian crisis, when we were in the frontline in the fights against the SHDKZ, and Eurussia, which came later, deliberately excluded our troops from the areas of operations.
During the recent months, we tried to peacefully settle this diplomatic conflict, by accepting Eurussia in the newly-created SOWESO, and by inviting in me to joint the RESEGI and sending a telegram to their government, and offering our mediation efforts for the liberation of hostages in the Eurussian embassy in Texania: all these efforts were frustrated, because they persisted to ignore us. Also, they refused to acknowledge the presence of Hovelars refugees on board my ships, thus accusing us of spreading false informations.
This is the background. Now, let's see what happened: the government of Eurussia published a news, regarding a nuclear submarine departed from Orenburg, which supposedly had an incident which provoked the death of a crewman and many wounded, but it was rescues thanks to the aid of the Shirouman and Atletiuan Navy; however, their Minister accused us to deliberately have refused to aid the submarine (https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t295p75-world-alliance-national-news-network). I would like to ask to the judges to particularly read the lat paragraph of this news, where suppoed international analysts "say that New Tarajan, who persistently criticize Moscow with baseless and unfounded accusations, missed an opportunity to show the world that it is a considerate state and allowed its issues with Eurussia to damage its international image". This was false, since our Fleet was never informed of what was happening(OOC: I have explained it before: I was never informed of this RP). Also, the statemente declaring that New Tarajan extradited Kim Jong-Un after pressures and "damaging sanctions", is false, since New Tarajan received no damages from these suppoed sanctions.
As you can easily imagine, Your Excellencies, the news that nuclear submarines, belonging to a Power perceived as hostile, after all what I showed to you, pass through so near our territorial waters (in the so-called countiguous zone, as customary international law says), was a troubling news.
Consequently, we asked to the Eurussian government to make official excuses regarding the spread of false informations about the submarine incident, and we ask them to remove all nuclear infrastructures from Orenburg, sending our 1st Fleet in a first, demonstrative blockade (https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t246p885-world-alliance-international-news-network#10505). Our requests were clear, and it was clear also our intention to minimize the effects on the population, ordering our fleets to stay far from the coasts (consequently, out of Eurussian territorial waters). However, unjustifiably tried to ignore this act, refusing to answer to our requests, thus to negotiate, and transforming suddenly Orenburg in a tropical paradise (which is impossible, due to its southern position).
New Tarajan was deeply concerned about such a behavior, thus we decided to enfore a more strong blockade. The Orenburg Tourist Department, in response, left the ferry and airplanes services to and from the island unchanged, unsefully risking the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians only to provoke our fleet. Obviously, no further response came from Moscow for our requests.

So, who is the aggrieved Party here? New Tarajan saw an hostile State refusing even to acknowledge its requests, after fabricating a huge lie, and leaving a submarine passes near it coasts. It was an act of self-defense. We are not a warmongering nation, and nobody, neither Eurussia nor anybody else, could say the opposite.
What we asked is simple, and we continue to ask it: official apologises, and removal of all nuclear infrastructures from Orenburg, under international supervision; obviously, if the Eurussian government wants to negotiate, we are more than willing to do so.

As last point, we would like to underline that, with this behavior (to not inform us of the passage of the submarine, and to fabricate lies against us) Eurussia clearly violated the spirit and the letter of the SOWESO Charter, a legally-binding Treaty duly signed by both our governments:

"Determined further to develop and intensify their military and political cooperation in
the interests of ensuring and strengthening national, regional and international security"
(Preamble)

"The member States shall agree upon and coordinate their foreign policy positions regarding
international and regional security problems, using, inter alia, the consultation
mechanisms and procedures of the Organization."
(Article 9)

Without doubts nuclear weapons is classified under the words regional security problems. We were never consulted, never informed. What New Tarajan has done is an act of self-defense.
Please, honourable judges, I will leave the word to you.
Thank you.
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:56 pm

Everybody knows what happened during the Koryan War, and how our two governments found themselves on the opposite sides of a law dispute about the extradiction of former dictator Kim Jong-Un. However, many other events happened after, which contributed to a deep mistrusts of our government toward Moscow intentions, such as rhe unjustified order, for our citizens living in Eurussia, to leave the country (while we refused to take such a decision, which could only harm innocent civilians) during the abovementioned crisis, or the continuous series of insults from Eurussia, also directed against the sister of the King, Princess Elise Angelique Van Vinkel, a thing extremely serious in the view of Tarajani culture. But let's move forward. Eurussia began to literally ignore us, an highly offensive behavior, especially during the Snarfian crisis, when we were in the frontline in the fights against the SHDKZ, and Eurussia, which came later, deliberately excluded our troops from the areas of operations. During the recent months, we tried to peacefully settle this diplomatic conflict, by accepting Eurussia in the newly-created SOWESO, and by inviting in me to joint the RESEGI and sending a telegram to their government, and offering our mediation efforts for the liberation of hostages in the Eurussian embassy in Texania: all these efforts were frustrated, because they persisted to ignore us.
Eurussia, as an independent sovereign state, has all the inherent rights in the world to exercise its sovereignty at will. And that involves choosing nations not forge ties with especially those whom we treated as allies but betrays us in the end. In which the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, admits. Nevertheless, this has no legal connection to the case.

As you can easily imagine, Your Excellencies, the news that nuclear submarines, belonging to a Power perceived as hostile, after all what I showed to you, pass through so near our territorial waters (in the so-called countiguous zone, as customary international law says), was a troubling news. Consequently, we asked to the Eurussian government to make official excuses regarding the spread of false informations about the submarine incident, and we ask them to remove all nuclear infrastructures from Orenburg, sending our 1st Fleet in a first, demonstrative blockade. Our requests were clear, and it was clear also our intention to minimize the effects on the population, ordering our fleets to stay far from the coasts.
Eurussia, as an independent sovereign state, deserves the right to utilize international waters and our government perfectly knows the customary laws (real world laws) that the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, is talking about and in fact, the submarine accident happened approximately 6,000 kilometers away (based on map) from the coastline of the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan with which extremely far from the Tarajani coastline much more its "customary" territorial waters which is 200 nautical miles or 370 kilometers.
(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Sub
Furthermore, Eurussia is confused that the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan persistently say that the submarine accident happened within its territorial waters with which in fact, as we have presented, is extremely far, very obvious. Then using the said false argument to seize the opportunity to accuse Eurussia of becoming a hostile state with which in fact our government admits that the submarine incident was an accident, the aggressor admitted that it was really an accident and they were not informed simply because it was an accident.
Furthermore, Eurussia is confused that the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan is accusing our government of being hostile just because we are using a nuclear submarine with which in fact the nuclear energy technology to run those submarines have been used as well with our aircraft carriers deployed everywhere in the world creating no fuss, at all. And the aggressor, later demands Eurussia to remove our own nuclear infrastructure in our very own sovereign territory, the Duchy of Orenburg, which is our very own inherent right. And that is to utilize nuclear technology in all possible ways for the benefit of our nation perfectly the same right enjoyed by all nations around the world.
Nevertheless, Eurussia is greatly pleased that the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, admitted that they in fact sent blockade at will, without our consent, to our very own sovereign territory, the Duchy of Orenburg, that is now causing considerable damage in different aspects not just to the people but to the local economy.

New Tarajan was deeply concerned about such a behavior, thus we decided to enfore a more strong blockade. The Orenburg Tourist Department, in response, left the ferry and airplanes services to and from the island unchanged, unsefully risking the lives of hundreds of innocent civilians only to provoke our fleet. Obviously, no further response came from Moscow for our requests.
Eurussia, is again, pleased of the admission of the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan of its enforcement of a more stringent naval blockade, clearly without our sovereign consent, on our very own sovereign territory, the Duchy of Orenburg. Furthermore, our government is clearly confused on saying of the aggressor that our very own Orenburg Tourism Department is risking the lives of our own citizens by continuing to allow flights and ferry services on our very own territory which has been its as usual business since time immemorial. In which the threats the aggressor are only saying are the very threats that they are the ones doing.
Nevertheless, the admissions of the aggressor makes our case stronger.

MOREOVER...


Despite all the accusations brought to us by the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, which were all now perfectly proven to be all false, our government remain steadfast, despite its military prowess, our government remains for peace ever since we have brought this aggression on our very own territory to this Court of Justice. Our government, as the world knows the same as the member states of this Court, that we never issued any public pronouncements or whatsoever about this interntional case as a true sign of respect to this honourable Court of Justice. Everyone knows this until now.
However, Eurussia is appalled that the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, continue to escalate the very aggression they are causing to our very own territory by making our country look like the aggressor which in fact, as have been perfectly proven, to be the aggrieved party. It is our intention to inform this Court the following:
https://2img.net/h/s30.postimg.cc/5sgbzwae9/image.png
https://2img.net/h/s12.postimg.cc/6d6jak15p/image.png
As this Court personally witnessed, the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, after recognizing the case and participating on its proceedings, later on accused our government of using the tourists, who were just simply enjoying the scenery of our very own sovereign territory, as human shields for reasons we cannot even understand, at all. Our government is extremely confused as to how Eurussia is using its very own tourists as human shield which were in fact are just enjoying the Duchy of Orenburg when the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, deployed their naval vessels and cause the very threats that they are accusing of Eurussia. They evened blatantly disrespected the Court by doing so, much worst, the aggressor, even sent correspondence to various countries spreading these baseless claims. Fortunately, people still enjoys the scenery.
Nevertheless, Eurussia, as the Court have personally witnessed, observed, and seen, all throughout these events, that our peace loving nation, never lift a finger. Frankly saying, Eurussia, has never militarized any issue very contrary to what is persistently being accused of us, unlike the real aggressor, New Tarajan.
Thank you very much!
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:00 am

Thank you for your long speech.

If the Court agrees, we will reply in a much more short way, however.
First of all, we wish to point out once again that what we said at the beginning of our defense, was obviously not meaning to deny the sovereign inherent rights of every State to choose its partners and allies; a right which nobody is denying here.
What my Eurussian colleague refuses to acknowledge, is that we summarized the main points of our previous crises only to demonstrate to the Court the spirit of deep mistrust actually existing between our two countries and this is a CLEAR connection to the case under judgement here.
Moreover, we never affirmed that the waters where the incident happened belong to us. We simply stated their vicinity to our coasts, which is very different, as I am sure the Eurussian delegate knows. The presence of the submarine in international waters was not our point: it was the passage NEAR our coasts, as the same Eurussian media news admitted, of the submarine without even informing us, even if the Mnemosynean Continent is actually under a security community (the SOWESO) which aims to boost cooperation in this field. As we said before, even if the Eurussian delegate seemed to have forgotten that, the move of Eurussia was in violation of the spirit of Article 9 of the SOWESO Charter.
Also, the Eurussian delegate here deliberately ignored one of our most important points: WE WERE NOT INFORMED of what was happening (also OOC), and they took that occasion to deliberately and gratuitously insult us, thus hitting our international credibility with false, fabricated informations and comments.
I ask sincerely to the Eurussian delegate to not make a law classes here, since we are perfectly aware of the content of the International Law, which does not provide for territorial waters to be set at 200 nautical miles, since this is the distance provided for an EEZ.
Regarding the last points: obviously we do not deny our free will and choice behind the blockade. However, we firmly reaffirm that it is intended as an act of self-defense, and this is confirmed also by our clear choice to not harm anyone, and actually our 1st Fleet is still beyond the Eurussian territorial waters.
The real point here is that Eurussian deliberately ignored our requests, thus forcing us to take, for the security of our own country, such a serious measure.
The Eurussian delegate could stop to continue to wave the so-pacifist attitude of Eurussia. The reality is that New Tarajan has not committed any crime that would legitimate a war. We, first of all, are committed to peace, and we have already demonstrated this attitude many times, not least by accepting this trial, and by inviting, also here, Eurussian to bilateral negotiations to settle our disputes.
Sincerely, the main cause of this situation was the behavior of Eurussia, which continues to ignore us, and to ignore the existence of a legitimate interest of New Tarajan in its own security and respect of itself as an actor in the international arena.
We do not ask here anything else that public apoligies for the spread of false informations agains us and our Navy and the sending of international inspectors to ensure that Orenburg do not host any nuclear-capable military infrastructure. Both things, normally, could have been resolve with negotiations between the actors involved, but since Eurussia steadily continue to ignore them, we have no other choice that to submit their legitimacy to the judgement of this Court too.
However, we wish to reaffirm that we are still committed to a peaceful resolution of this crisis. Indeed, we will order, as a sign of goodwill, to our 1st Fleet to retreat near southern Antanaresian coasts, waiting for the verdict of this Court.


OOC: Eurussia, is it possible what you showed on the map? I mean...if the proportion are correct...then the World Alliance is at least 50 times bigger than the Earth!! (this is not a critic to your defense...but...I'm stunned)
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Ivania Thu Dec 05, 2013 2:20 am

The court is overlooking evidence given this will be a period of no debating as we gather opinions
Ivania
Ivania
Powerbroker

Posts : 126
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : California

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Thu Dec 05, 2013 10:08 am

Ivania wrote:The court is overlooking evidence given this will be a period of no debating as we gather opinions
Thank you very much. 
The Eurussian Government has no rebuttal anymore to the defense of the aggressor, the Kingdom of New Tarajan as they are purely defensive statements. Furthermore, the mere fact of retreating their blockade thus in fact made our case to their aggression against our very own sovereign territory, the Duchy of Orenburg, extremely stronger. We do not see its latest actions as a sign of goodwill but a further sign of admission that they did something wrong that violated international laws whatever the reasons they are trying to justify.
Nevertheless, the Eurussian Government has said enough and leave the resolution of this case before the Court of Justice to ponder upon and hid our legal intervention to order the Kingdom of New Tarajan to withdraw its naval blockade over our sovereign territory of the Duchy of Orenburg. And to order the WAPF, WASDA, WAAF and WAHO to implement the aforementioned request of withdrawal of the illegal and irresponsible naval blockade over our Duchy of Orenburg.
Eurussia rests its case and waits for the Court decision.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Thu Dec 05, 2013 3:52 pm

We will wait for a response of ths judges.
However we ask them to take into consideration also the last provocations from Eurussia, and how it implictly lied before depicting Orenburg as a tourist heaven and not citing these informations:

https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t246p915-world-alliance-international-news-network

Thank you.
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:29 am

Stirva wrote:I support Eurussia in this conflict. New Tarajan is pushing Eurussia around and telling them to do as he says like they're his puppet. This is thurely inappropriate and only makes Stirvas president Joanes Gartev to look at New Tarajan with disgust and with one simple definition of the nations government. "A Bully". Therefore if this were to escalate into war Stirva would declare war on New Tarajan and join sides with Eurussia.
PLEASE IGNORE THIS AND ANY POSTS MADE BY STRIVA, HE HAS BEEN BANJECTED.
Europe and Asia
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Guest Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:30 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Stirva wrote:I support Eurussia in this conflict. New Tarajan is pushing Eurussia around and telling them to do as he says like they're his puppet. This is thurely inappropriate and only makes Stirvas president Joanes Gartev to look at New Tarajan with disgust and with one simple definition of the nations government. "A Bully". Therefore if this were to escalate into war Stirva would declare war on New Tarajan and join sides with Eurussia.
PLEASE IGNORE THIS AND ANY POSTS MADE BY STRIVA, HE HAS BEEN BANJECTED.
You can't force me to leave this website unless you have any power to do so.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:32 am

Also, the court is making its decision. Please wait for an announcement.

OOC: Dealing with the Striva case, but I'll rule as soon as I confer with the other justices.
Europe and Asia
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:52 am


Eurussia respectfully submits to this honourable Court of Justice a resolution from an independent sovereign state, neighboring our Duchy of Orenburg, the Kingdom of Atletius through a resolution from its Parliament.
Our submission of this declaration from Atletius is for this Court's consideration that the aggressor (New Tarajan) continues to dishonor this Court in anyway for its advantage by implementing actions despite the on-going case in this tribunal and despite our deepest silence on all these provocations as a respect to this Court.
Nevertheless, these acts strengthened our case further. Hence, Eurussia, the aggrieved, submits and awaits the resolution of this case from the Court of Justice.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:40 am

We would like to protest against this submission.
The Royal Navy is simply patrolling International Waters in cooperation with the Antanaresian and the Aloian navies, and this is a right of every country under International Law.
We respectfully ask the Court to ignore this unuseful and illegal claim.
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:49 am

New Tarajan wrote:We would like to protest against this submission.
The Royal Navy is simply patrolling International Waters in cooperation with the Antanaresian and the Aloian navies, and this is a right of every country under International Law.
Eurussia formally submits before this Court of Justice the statements of the aggressor (New Tarajan) because we sincerely believe that their latest provocations with which they justify as patrolling international waters which is the right of every country under intetnational laws is the very same argument they used to justify their violation of our sovereignty when they unilaterally imposed a naval blockade on our own territory of Orenburg.
If this honourable tribunal could remember, our nuclear powered submarine who is just travelling (not even patrolling) the Shirouma Sea, proven to be not within the aggressor's territorial waters, who was caught in an accident, bound to Orenburg was the very argument the aggressor justified to illegally enforce a naval blockade in our own territory of Orenburg which they ADMITTED.
Nevertheless, Eurussia undeniably believes that the admissions, actions, provocations, and even disrespect to this honourable tribunal of the aggressor (New Tarajan) simple made our case extremely STRONG.
Hence, we wait for the conclusion of this CASE.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:01 pm

The court thanks the nations for their patience.

The court, having reviewed the evidence, has come to the following conclusions:

A Eurussian nuclear submarine failed in international waters, and the New Tarajani navy refused to aid the vessel.

The New Tarajani navy blockaded a Eurussian colony illegally, without provocation.

The New Tarajani navy has continued maneuvers despite this ongoing judiciary case, which is a clear disregard for the court's importance.

Thusly, the Chief Justice presents the ruling:

The Empire of Great Eurussia is reprimanded by the court for failing to inform the Tarajani navy of the nuclear submarine emergency, insofar as the Tarajani claim that no distress signal was received indicates that the Eurussian Submarine did not send a distress signal that was decodable to the Tarajani Navy. For failing to do so, the Eurussian Treasury is to pay the World Alliance Court of Justice ₩5,000,000.

The Kingdom of New Tarajan is severely reprimanded by the court for the blockade of the Great Eurussian colony, as it was deliberately to provoke a Eurussian response and was diplomatically and internationally irresponsible and deceitful. The decision by the Tarajani government to withdraw forces only reinforces this verdict. For the illegal and unlawful blockade of the Great Eurussian Colony, the New Tarajani Treasury is to pay the World Alliance Court of Justice ₩1,500,000,000.

Furthermore, the WAAF is to intervene on behalf of the international community and ensure that all New Tarajani forces are removed from the waters of Great Eurussia. Eurussia is also ordered to remove all naval forces that may be present in New Tarajani waters.

Finally, both nations are to hereby agree to a treaty of peace so as to avoid further incidents such as this. The treaty will be either negotiated by the partaking nations, or by this honorable court. This is left to the discretion of the partaking nations only.

Lastly, the court reminds both nations that further infractions of international law will result in significantly higher fines or possibly WAAF intervention.


Last edited by Europe and Asia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Europe and Asia
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Appeal

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:12 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:Thusly, the Chief Justice presents the ruling:

The Empire of Great Eurussia is reprimanded by the court for failing to inform the Tarajani navy of the nuclear submarine emergency, insofar as the Tarajani claim that no distress signal was received indicates that the Eurussian Submarine did not send a distress signal that was decodable to the Tarajani Navy. For failing to do so, the Eurussian Treasury is to pay the World Alliance Court of Justice ₩500,000,000.
Eurussia invokes its privileges under Section 7 and Section 8 of the Judicial Protocol Act to file an appeal or motion for reconsideration due to the above highlighted provisions of the ruling of this honourable tribunal.
With due respect to this Court, we believe that it is unfair to fine the Eurussian Government in whatever amount due to the grounds cited as the incident was an accident, with which this tribunal has affirmed. Moreover, the nuclear powered submarine was in constant contact to the Imperial Navy, Shirouma Navy, and the Atletian Navy from its departure until the accident which ended the communication from the submarine to the navies. From this unexpected loss of communication, the three navies was prompted to deploy naval ships to the last coordinates of contact with the submarine which was later on proven to have hit a massive seamountain that resulted to heavy damage and power failure. In this sense, a distress signal from the submarine was impossible.
Instead, Eurussia seeks for financial compensation to the economic damages brought by the illegal naval blockade of New Tarajan to our Duchy of Orenburg, which was also affirmed by this Court. The actions brought disruption of flights, ferry services, emotional fears for millions of local population, and thousands of tourists. Thus, we seek 500 billion euros of compensation from New Tarajan.
Eurussia will await the consideration of the Court.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia Sun Dec 08, 2013 3:18 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Thusly, the Chief Justice presents the ruling:

The Empire of Great Eurussia is reprimanded by the court for failing to inform the Tarajani navy of the nuclear submarine emergency, insofar as the Tarajani claim that no distress signal was received indicates that the Eurussian Submarine did not send a distress signal that was decodable to the Tarajani Navy. For failing to do so, the Eurussian Treasury is to pay the World Alliance Court of Justice ₩500,000,000.
Eurussia invokes its privileges under Section 7 and Section 8 of the Judicial Protocol Act to file an appeal or motion for reconsideration due to the above highlighted provisions of the ruling of this honourable tribunal.
With due respect to this Court, we believe that it is unfair to fine the Eurussian Government in whatever amount due to the grounds cited as the incident was an accident, with which this tribunal has affirmed. Moreover, the nuclear powered submarine was in constant contact to the Imperial Navy, Shirouma Navy, and the Atletian Navy from its departure until the accident which ended the communication from the submarine to the navies. From this unexpected loss of communication, the three navies was prompted to deploy naval ships to the last coordinates of contact with the submarine which was later on proven to have hit a massive seamountain that resulted to heavy damage and power failure. In this sense, a distress signal from the submarine was impossible.
Instead, Eurussia seeks for financial compensation to the economic damages brought by the illegal naval blockade of New Tarajan to our Duchy of Orenburg, which was also affirmed by this Court. The actions brought disruption of flights, ferry services, emotional fears for millions of local population, and thousands of tourists. Thus, we seek 500 billion euros of compensation from New Tarajan.
Eurussia will await the consideration of the Court.
The court wishes to correct Eurussia in that due to an error by the court clerk it's allotted fine is in actuality ₩5,000,000,

The court will hear Eurussia's appeal. This case is now again in session.
Europe and Asia
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:15 pm

The government of New Tarajan wishes to answer to our Eurussian colleague.

First of all, the Eurussian request to receive economic damages as compensation is absurd, since they were the first ones to claim that no business was harmed by the blockade and that the ferry and air services by and from the island of Orenburg continued without problems (https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t246p900-world-alliance-international-news-network, look at the end of the first Eurussian news, under the title "EU downplays New Tarajan"). So, please, decide: there was harm or not?

Also, we reaffirm that the 1st Fleet was not in their territorial waters during the symbolic blockade.

About the problems in the submarine, the defense operated by Eurussia is simply a demonstration that we were right: indeed, the Shirouman and the Atletian navies knew the coordinates of the submarine, but NOT our Navy, which were not informed of the existence of this submarine route AT ALL, and which did not know of the presence of Eurussians submarines in the Shirouman Sea. It is fair to remember not only that this was the main reason for our feeling of a threat from Eurussia, but also that it is a far more serious ad dangerous behavior, in full violation of the spirit of the SOWESO Treaty and easily interpretable as an hostile action against our Kingdom.

Finally, about the request from the Court for the signing of a Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia aimed to resolve our disputes, we would like to remind that, also during this trial, we tried to make contact with Moscow, taking the occasions of the presence of Chancellor Putin in Orenburg (clear provocation toward us that we ignored, in the sake of peace and respect of this Court), to ask for a meeting between the Chancellor and the King to create a first ground for negotiations, but we did not receive any response, once again. This, and their decision to ignore also our official invitation to join the International Peace Conference and to sign the Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, should be a fair demonstration of the unwillingness of Eurussia to find such a peaceful solution.
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:47 pm

New Tarajan wrote:The government of New Tarajan wishes to answer to our Eurussian colleague.

First of all, the Eurussian request to receive economic damages as compensation is absurd, since they were the first ones to claim that no business was harmed by the blockade and that the ferry and air services by and from the island of Orenburg continued without problems.
Eurussia, as stated on our appeal, deserves to have a compensation of "€500 billion euros" as damages to the illegal naval blockade of New Tarajan, which was ALREADY CONFIRMED BY THIS COURT. This is a reparation to the economic losses to the local economy of the Duchy of Orenburg due to disrupted domestic and international flights, local and international ferry services, local fishing and other aquatic resources gathering, and most importantly, the psychological fears the illegal action of the aggressor caused to millions of the local population and as well as the thousands of tourists due to the naval ships surrounding our territory which of course, all armed and could lead in an eventuality of invasion.
https://2img.net/h/s30.postimg.cc/5sgbzwae9/image.png
https://2img.net/h/s12.postimg.cc/6d6jak15p/image.png
Our claims can be further attested by New Tarajan itself when it accused our government for using our very own citizens as human shields where in fact they themselves are the threats to the ever peaceful archipelago. The undeniable fact that the illegal actions of the aggressor caused concerns could be attested by the response from the Atletian Government and Stirvan tourists reporting to their own government of their shock and fears of the harassment caused by the naval vessels of New Tarajan, which will rebuke their claims that they are not in our territorial waters where in fact they have caused harassment in unprecedented levels.
About the problems in the submarine, the defense operated by Eurussia is simply a demonstration that we were right: indeed, the Shirouman and the Atletian navies knew the coordinates of the submarine, but NOT our Navy, which were not informed of the existence of this submarine route AT ALL, and which did not know of the presence of Eurussians submarines in the Shirouman Sea. It is fair to remember not only that this was the main reason for our feeling of a threat from Eurussia, but also that it is a far more serious ad dangerous behavior, in full violation of the spirit of the SOWESO Treaty and easily interpretable as an hostile action against our Kingdom.
As what we have stated as well, and as the honourable Court will attest, that the Imperial Navy is not obliged to inform the Tarajani Navy of the route of our submarine who is just simply bound to Orenburg from a goodwill visit in Shirouma as the nuclear powered submarine is in INTERNATIONAL WATERS. However, we are obliged to inform the Shiroumian Navy because the submarine is departing from their territorial waters and the Atletian Navy because our submarine will cross an uncharteredd strait with which our Imperial Navy is unsure if our vessel will cross Atletian waters as its opposite side is only a plain barbaric lands.
(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Submarine

Finally, about the request from the Court for the signing of a Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia aimed to resolve our disputes, we would like to remind that, also during this trial, we tried to make contact with Moscow, taking the occasions of the presence of Chancellor Putin in Orenburg (clear provocation toward us that we ignored, in the sake of peace and respect of this Court), to ask for a meeting between the Chancellor and the King to create a first ground for negotiations, but we did not receive any response, once again. This, and their decision to ignore also our official invitation to join the International Peace Conference and to sign the Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, should be a fair demonstration of the unwillingness of Eurussia to find such a peaceful solution.
Eurussia believes that the warning from the Court of Justice that AGGRESSION FROM NEW TARAJAN should not happen again is supreme over a peace treaty and suffice enough to prevent aggressors from threatening our peace loving Eurussian Empire with which our government humbly submitted to this Court to avoid war. Furthermore, we sincerely believe that inaction to correspondences to Moscow, in which we cannot confirm neither will we confirm, is not equivalent to provocation as there is no proven response, at all.
Again, our APPEAL stands and hopes for a conclusion from this COURT.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:59 pm

New Tarajan wrote:The government of New Tarajan wishes to answer to our Eurussian colleague.

First of all, the Eurussian request to receive economic damages as compensation is absurd, since they were the first ones to claim that no business was harmed by the blockade and that the ferry and air services by and from the island of Orenburg continued without problems (https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t246p900-world-alliance-international-news-network, look at the end of the first Eurussian news, under the title "EU downplays New Tarajan"). So, please, decide: there was harm or not?

Also, we reaffirm that the 1st Fleet was not in their territorial waters during the symbolic blockade.

About the problems in the submarine, the defense operated by Eurussia is simply a demonstration that we were right: indeed, the Shirouman and the Atletian navies knew the coordinates of the submarine, but NOT our Navy, which were not informed of the existence of this submarine route AT ALL, and which did not know of the presence of Eurussians submarines in the Shirouman Sea. It is fair to remember not only that this was the main reason for our feeling of a threat from Eurussia, but also that it is a far more serious ad dangerous behavior, in full violation of the spirit of the SOWESO Treaty and easily interpretable as an hostile action against our Kingdom.

Finally, about the request from the Court for the signing of a Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia aimed to resolve our disputes, we would like to remind that, also during this trial, we tried to make contact with Moscow, taking the occasions of the presence of Chancellor Putin in Orenburg (clear provocation toward us that we ignored, in the sake of peace and respect of this Court), to ask for a meeting between the Chancellor and the King to create a first ground for negotiations, but we did not receive any response, once again. This, and their decision to ignore also our official invitation to join the International Peace Conference and to sign the Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, should be a fair demonstration of the unwillingness of Eurussia to find such a peaceful solution.
The court requests evidence of these communiques to Moscow.

The court also states and affirms that a visit to Orenburg by Lord Chancellor Putin is not a provocation, as any national leader is expected to visit their people in a time of worry, especially an island archipelago that is currently blockaded.

The court also informs New Tarajan that a symbolic blockade is a blockade nonetheless.

Finally, the court requests from Great Eurussia a transcript of the submarine distress signal, and a transcript of the submarines detailing the reactor failure. The court also requests from New Tarajan a list of all ships within a 100 mile radius of the submarine, and a transcript of their radio transmissions for the night.
Europe and Asia
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:15 am

OOC: I'm sincere...I don't now how to comply XD I'm not expert of transmissions or similar...please, help me. Also, how can I do a screenshot of the message I sent to Eurussia?
New Tarajan
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan Empty Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum