(Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Ireland Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:59 am

Nuclear Weapon Control Act

Article I
A political body in itself meaning all countries of the world, can only have nuclear weapons up to the size of 50 megatons. They can have as many nuclear weapons as they wish but the size must not surpass 50 megatons.

Article I
Any nation caught with more than the allowed weight on Nuclear Weaponry will be put on trial in front of the World Alliance Court of Justice.

Article III
The World Alliance Council is empowered to carry out and enforce this law.

Article IV
If a nation so wishes they can be exempt from this but it is highly recommended that they dont.

Arveyres Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:58 am

We are completely AGAINST this unconstitutional proposal as it infringes against the Right to Self Determination, restricting nations from advancing in nuclear weaponry and technology.

Texania Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:19 am

I propose an amendment.Instead of outright banning nuclear weapons,there will be a limit on a nations allowed cache size.I propose that a nation can have no more than 75 nuclear weapons.

I vote Against the original proposal.

Planitan Commonwealth Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:29 am

It is highly unlikely you would get any supporters if you do not have amendments of anykind.

Ireland Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:34 am

Ok I will change it to a Nuclear Control Act

Ireland Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:40 am

I have edited the proposal

Texania Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:51 am

I am now FOR this bill.

Arveyres Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:59 am

I am still AGAINST this bill and all proposed amendments.

Planitan Commonwealth Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:03 am

Europe and Asia Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:06 am

This bill is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. you are infringing on nations sovereignty by proposing this. Thusly, if this bill is not removed, it will be immediately repealed.

Might I suggest you instead vote to limit the size and power of nuclear weaponry, such as to, say, 50 megatons or so.

Ireland Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:25 am

How is this infringing on national sovereignty. TI is limiting the amount of Nuclear Weapons a nation can have. The United Nations itself has a similar banning the use of nuclear warfare and limiting how many nuclear weapons they can have. This is to ensure the safety of the region. Nowhere does it say that the use of Nuclear weapons is banned.So how is this unconstitutional. Nowhere in this proposal does in infringe on sovereignty.

Europe and Asia Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:45 am

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:How is this infringing on national sovereignty. TI is limiting the amount of Nuclear Weapons a nation can have. The United Nations itself has a similar banning the use of nuclear warfare and limiting how many nuclear weapons they can have. This is to ensure the safety of the region. Nowhere does it say that the use of Nuclear weapons is banned.So how is this unconstitutional. Nowhere in this proposal does in infringe on sovereignty.

It is every nations sovereign right to possess nuclear weaponry, and limiting that is infringing on that right, limiting the size, however, is not unconstitutional.

Great Eurussia Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:35 am

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:Nuclear Weapon Control Act

Article I
One nation can only have 50 megaton Nuclear Weapons

Article I
Any nation caught with more than the allowed amount of Nuclear Weapons will be put on trial in front of the World Alliance Court of Justice.

Article III
The World Alliance Security Council is empowered to carry out and enforce this law.

Article IV
Nations will still be allowed to have Nuclear Power Plants and Nuclear Powered Subs. Along with other Nuclear technologies.

Eurussia is against the proposed legislation, but, we will be inclined to support this if it mandatorily imposes total ban on nuclear weapons even if it infringes on our right to exercise sovereignty as it will contribute to long lasting world peace, even if its impossible.

Eurussia also reminds the WA Parliament of the existence of the Nuclear Test Ban Act which is universally enforced to all nations of the world passed by the defunct Security Council of the World Alliance.

Ireland Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:41 am

I tried that Eurasia said it was unconstitutional

Europe and Asia Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:53 am

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:I tried that Eurasia said it was unconstitutional

It infringes on national sovereignty. And the bill itself is poorly worded. You essentially say in article I that only 1 nation can have 1 50 megaton bomb.

Great Eurussia Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:13 pm

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:I tried that Eurasia said it was unconstitutional

Eurasia's statement is not automatically equivalent to the judgement of the WA Court of Justice. It is up to you to fight on this passage or retreat. If it passes, it's the only time to decide if this is unconstitutional when someone challenges the law's constitutionality.

All we are saying of its unconstitutionality are just all our opinions, beliefs, and positions.

Dromoda Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:24 pm

we vote against.

we don't want everyone to know how much nuclear weapons we have

Marquette (of Pacific) Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:01 pm

Oh yeah, whoops! We are now in an official debating period, which will end at 0:00 (GMT) on the 1st of February. After which, a three-day voting period will commence, and will end at 0:00 (GMT) ont he 4th of February.

Federation of Antanares Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:32 pm

I think the participation mustn't be mandatory. In the UN the nations that don't want to participate can avoid to sign a protocol or an act. Antanares would not approve any kind of intrusion in our sovereignty.

Ireland Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:50 am

Federation of Antanares wrote:I think the participation mustn't be mandatory. In the UN the nations that don't want to participate can avoid to sign a protocol or an act. Antanares would not approve any kind of intrusion in our sovereignty.

This isn't infringing on your sovereignty. It isn't saying that you can only have a certain amount of nuclear weapons, its saying that they can only be 50 megatons. you can have 1,000,000 nuclear weapons for all I care but this is saying that they can only be up to 50 megatons.

This law is necessary for the safety of the environment, and for the people of the region. If the size is reduced then the amount of radiation it put out will also be reduced and so on. So I am For this bill.

Atletius Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:38 am

Will this be mandatory?

Ireland Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:48 am

Atletius wrote:Will this be mandatory?

No but highly suggested

Ireland Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:13 am

Dromoda wrote:we vote against.

we don't want everyone to know how much nuclear weapons we have

Dromoda you dont have to destroy any of your weapons they just have to be this size or smaller.

Atletius Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:34 am

This piece of legislation is flawed in many ways.
OPPOSED

Ireland Fri Jan 31, 2014 3:36 am

Atletius wrote:This piece of legislation is flawed in many ways.
OPPOSED

Can you please tell me where it is flawed

Sponsored content

(Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

(Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Eurussian Vote

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act

Re: (Dismissed) Nuclear Weapons Control Act