Re: (IFTA) International Free Trade Association

New Tarajan Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:29 am

Ireland wrote:I motion to vote on the suspension of Eurussia from IFTA

Can we ask the reason for such a move?

Ireland Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:31 am

New Tarajan wrote:
Ireland wrote:I motion to vote on the suspension of Eurussia from IFTA

Can we ask the reason for such a move?

Eurussia's recent actions on the world stage

New Tarajan Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:32 am

Ireland wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:
Ireland wrote:I motion to vote on the suspension of Eurussia from IFTA

Can we ask the reason for such a move?
Eurussia's recent actions on the world stage

We understand.
Well, we believe the best move to do would be to wait for an Eurussian response (and possibly, a defense) before proceeding.

Ireland Tue Jul 01, 2014 8:46 am

New Tarajan wrote:
Ireland wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:
Ireland wrote:I motion to vote on the suspension of Eurussia from IFTA

Can we ask the reason for such a move?
Eurussia's recent actions on the world stage

We understand.
Well, we believe the best move to do would be to wait for an Eurussian response (and possibly, a defense) before proceeding.

I have nothing against Eurussia but you.and Eurasia aren't exactly friend with him. So its either loose one nation or two nation or y'all can just deal with each other. Because Trad Barriers aren't allowed in this organization.

New Tarajan Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:04 am

We thank you for trying to make our positions more comfortable, but we wish to inform you that New Tarajan has no intention to implement barriers against Eurussia until the situation will not get far more worse than it actually is.
We have faith in our good-will and diplomacy, and in Eurasia too, and we are not reknown for our aggressive policies. It's Eurussian responsibility, now, to decide what to do next.
And, by the way, before implementing economic sanctions our government will duly inform IFTA.

Ireland Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:07 am

New Tarajan wrote:We thank you for trying to make our positions more comfortable, but we wish to inform you that New Tarajan has no intention to implement barriers against Eurussia until the situation will not get far more worse than it actually is.
We have faith in our good-will and diplomacy, and in Eurasia too, and we are not reknown for our aggressive policies. It's Eurussian responsibility, now, to decide what to do next.
And, by the way, before implementing economic sanctions our government will duly inform IFTA.

Thank You!

Kaevi Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:30 am

The proposal below is mainly meant to put our current unofficial-official practices into law. This proposal requires four "yes" votes in order to go into IFTA law.

-=-=-=-

International Trade Protection Act

Section I

Art. A - Allows the IFTA to guard merchant crafts that travel in international waters to exchange goods and other tradable items.
Art. B - Prohibits any member nation of the IFTA from transporting weapons or soldiers within a merchant vessel.
Art. C - Creates a voluntary blue-water maritime force known as the International Free Trade Merchant Marines with the purpose of protecting merchant ships from attack by any outside force.
Art. D - Divides the International Free Trade Merchant Marines into three groups consisting of a navy-based air force, traditional ships, and a submarine force.
Art. E - Each division of the International Free Trade Merchant Navy shall act autonomously of one another and will act upon request on the owner nation of the merchant ship in question.
Art. F - Each division of the International Free Trade Merchant Marines may be headed by a Commander Marshal, who is to be chosen by the Secretary General and may hold any existing rank in the IFTA government.
Art. G - Establishes the IFTA Secretary General as the leader of the International Free Trade Merchant Marines as a whole.
Art. H - Allows members to remove a Commander Marshal from rank via two-thirds vote from all members.
Art. I - The International Free Trade Merchant Marines may only enter ports or military establishments that have the consent of the owner nation.

Section II

Art. A - Prohibits any member nation of the IFTA to conduct unauthorized surveillance on any other member nation’s merchant vessels.
Art. B - Prohibits any member nation from destroying or stealing the property of another member nation’s vessels while in international waters.
Art. C - Prohibits the International Free Trade Merchant Marines from using weapons of mass destruction at any location or situation.
Art. D - Prohibits the International Free Trade Merchant Marines from knowingly guarding ships that contain weapons of mass destruction.
Art. E - Prohibits the International Free Trade Merchant Marines from collaborating with other outside military forces and protecting outside military vessels at any time.
Art. F - Members who break any rule in this document must appear before the Adviser General for a hearing of the case. Punishments include suspension or removal from leadership of the International Free Trade Merchant Marines, fines, and the surrender of militarized vessels to become collective property of the IFTA.
Art. G - Cases will be forwarded to the WA Court of Justice if the nation is found to violate laws of the World Alliance.

Approved by IFTA Secretary General

Ireland Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:56 am

Kaevi Wed Jul 02, 2014 4:30 am

Europe and Asia Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:32 am

Yes.

Also, is the position for Advisor General still available?

Ireland Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:51 am

Europe and Asia wrote:Yes.

Also, is the position for Advisor General still available?

I think I gave to Kaevi. Unless he wants to hand it to you. I dont know.

Kaevi Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:18 am

Ireland wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Yes.

Also, is the position for Advisor General still available?
I think I gave to Kaevi. Unless he wants to hand it to you. I dont know.

Kaevi is the Adviser General for now. But do not fret, for nothing lasts forever.

New Tarajan Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:22 am

Ireland Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:34 am

On a vote of 4/6 this Bill passes

Kaevi Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:01 am

Ireland wrote:On a vote of 4/6 this Bill passes

The act has been added to the database. As part of the act, the Secretary General may now choose the Commander Marshals if needed at this time.

Sponsored content