(Passed) Election Regulation Act

Great Eurussia Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:10 pm

In our aim to ensure that the democratic processes undertaken by the World Alliance are with accordance to our Constitution, and as well as our aspirations for an efficient democratic system most especially on our general elections, Eurussia, concurrently Member State of the Parliament, Member State of the Council, and the Secretary General, do hereby honored to present before this honourable Parliament, our proposed legislation.

ELECTION REGULATION ACT

Authored by the Empire of Great Eurussia

Member of the World Alliance Royalist Party

Section 1) The Secretary General from hereon, tasked by the Constitution to administer elections in the World Alliance, in the spirit of democracy, shall handover such responsibility to the duly appointed Election Commissioner, whereas as prescribed herein, all results handled by the latter shall be certified by the Secretary General to become official and executory.

Section 2) The Election Commissioner, at the time of appointment, shall come from the elected Member States of the WA Council, duly appointed by the President of the WA Council which shall remain in office at the pleasure of the WA Council and shall only be removed from office via resignation or dismissal via majority decision of the WA Council.

Section 3) The Election Commissioner shall have the primary duty of administering the elections in the World Alliance which involves functions including but not limited to notifications, creation of dedicated threads or subforums, creating ballots, announcements, counting of votes, verifying of votes, and other duties as prescribed by law.

Section 4) The Election Commissioner shall administer elections of the WA Council, WA Parliament, and WA Court of Justice within the bounds of law and the WA Constitution especially on the timing of the filing and/or registration of candidacy, period of voting, period of counting, proclamation of winners and so on and so forth.

Section 5) The Election Commission shall ensure transparency of any election.

Section 6) The World Alliance hereby strictly prohibits puppet nations, registered or not, from participating in anyway, including but not limited to, voting in anyway, running for office, taking office or any position within the WA Government.

Section 7) The World Alliance hereby strictly prohibits nations not on the official WA Map from participating in anyway, including but not limited to, voting in anyway, running for office, taking office or any position within the WA Government.

Section 8) Any conflict that may arise on the course of the effectivity and/or implementation of this law in terms of RP and OOC matters shall be resolved by the judiciary.

Federation of Antanares Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:32 pm

We are now in an official debating period, which will end at 0:00 (GMT) on the 9th of February. After which, a three day voting period will begin, and will end at 0:00 (GMT) on the 12th of the same month.

Ireland Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:38 am

I am in full Support of this bill

New-Zealand Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:24 pm

I vote in FAVOUR of this bill.

Texania Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:55 pm

I shall abstain

Ireland Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:41 am

Texania wrote:I shall abstain

Why?

Marquette (of Pacific) Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:54 am

New-Zealand wrote:I vote in FAVOUR of this bill.

Voting is from the 9th to the 12th...

Texania Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:53 am

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:
Texania wrote:I shall abstain
Why?

I do believe I am allowed to abstain,so I will.

Ireland Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:55 am

Texania wrote:
Great Empire of Ireland wrote:
Texania wrote:I shall abstain
Why?

I do believe I am allowed to abstain,so I will.

Ok I was just wondering

Ireland Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:14 am

The Kingdom of Greater Empire of Ireland votes Yes to this proposal.

Marquette (of Pacific) Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:02 am

The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

Arveyres Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:03 am

We vote in FAVOUR of this bill.

Great Eurussia Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:43 am

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

Well it seems you haven't read the law. lol

Atletius Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:15 am

Atletius will vote in FAVOUR

Yellasia Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:38 pm

Yellasia votes in FAVOUR of this bill.

New-Zealand Tue Feb 11, 2014 4:02 pm

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

Shirouma Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:03 pm

Against

Marquette (of Pacific) Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:35 am

New-Zealand wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Ireland Wed Feb 12, 2014 6:37 am

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
New-Zealand wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:The Constitutional Monarchy of Marquette of Pacific hereby votes AGAINST this bill, as it gives too much power to the Secretary General and other members of the World Alliance government. Decentralization is key, folks.

The secretary general is loosing his power in favour of a more democratic option.

That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Hes not giving it away. I believe it is going to be elected by the Council or Parliment but hes not just going to give it away like the lottery.

Great Eurussia Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:22 am

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Planitan Commonwealth Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:27 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

hint... hint....

Marquette (of Pacific) Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:28 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Eurussia, shut up. I am understanding this bill perfectly, and I understand I don't support it. As I said before, our current system is fine. We don't need to change things just for the sake of change or because it will make elections more fluid or easier.

Planitan Commonwealth Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:37 pm

I give FULL SUPPORT for this bill.

Ireland Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:41 pm

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:
That's not how I see it. The Secretary General is creating this position just to give to his allies as a thank-you for doing as he pleases. This is going to make the government even more corrupt.

Obviously, it is funny how certain nations dare to exercise their right to opinion when iy is perfectly obvious whose not reading much more understandinght is written :-/

Eurussia, shut up. I am understanding this bill perfectly, and I understand I don't support it. As I said before, our current system is fine. We don't need to change things just for the sake of change or because it will make elections more fluid or easier.

That's your opinion. No you aren't understanding this bill and it has tremendous support so how about you just deal with that.

Arveyres Wed Feb 12, 2014 1:50 pm

Marquette, obviously you are not understanding.

This makes a new role to take power away from the Secretary General. This is to make elections easier. This does not give power to the SG.

Until you realize what the proposed bill imposes, I will continue to use bold font. Please don't make me go bold italics.

Sponsored content

(Passed) Election Regulation Act

(Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act

Re: (Passed) Election Regulation Act