(Pending) Jillin Island Dispute Intervention

Disputed Territory of Jillin Island: (NEUTRALIZATION)
- by diplomats of the Moscow Peace Summit

Citing the commendable internationalizing of dispute the People's Republic of Dromoda made to finally pressure the Monarchy of Kennyland to speak up on the matter and resolve the long simmering dispute once and for all to bring long lasting peace in the Asian Continent and neighboring regions, it is in our belief that we must seek the WA Government's intervention,

Whereas, citing that it is the duty of the WA Government to ensure peace and stability in the world under the WA Constitutition, it is therefore imperative that the WA Council must exercise its powers due to the actions of the directly involved nations, particularly Dromoda and Kennyland, where the latter continues to remain silent while the entire world is looking for a diplomatic solution and the former continues to maintain peace despite its obvious loosening patience of the dispute.

With these, it is now high time for the WA Council to authorize the WA Armed Forces, to bring peacekeeping neutral forced in Jillin Island, the WA Department of Security & Justice, to bring civilian peace and order in Jillin Island, and the WA Humanitarian Organization, to bring humanitarian assistance in Jillin Island, thus temporarily making the disputed Jillin Island under the mandate of the WA Government.

This neutral status quo must be maintained until such time that Kennyland and Dromoda becomes ready to peacefully and diplomatically resolve the matter through bilateral talks or through arbitration before the WA Court of Justice. And any external party violating this status quo shall be considered a crime against the international communitt through the WA Government and blatant violation of the WA Constitution who mandated the WA Council to maintain peace and stability in the world.

New Tarajan wrote:Eurussia was very clear when Antanares proposed the sending of WAAF forces to protect Judlyn: with no consent of the Kennyland government, it would be illegal.
Thus, there's nothing more to add to this, apart for the fact that this is an unilateral decision of Eurussia, and that we did not see such a consent on this and the other Eurussian proposals by the other countries mentioned (and, moreover, there's no more any Tarajani diplomat in Moscow)

Thus, we are AGAINST the bill for violation of the WA Constitution.

Thank you.

New Tarajan wrote:It's so strange that the Eurussian government remembers only NOW the existence of the concept of Supranational Sovereignty in the WA Constitution, when it deliberately ignored it many times New Tarajan and other countries carried on laws with the specific goal of bringing peace, stability and order in the World Alliance.

Like here: https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t486-rejected-international-interventions-regulation-act

Or here: https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t462-approved-judiciary-investigation-act

With all due respect, your behavior is simply ridiculous, and even offensive for the intelligence of the members of this Council.

We'll continue to be AGAINST.

Thank you.

Dromoda wrote:Dromoda vote's in favor

New Tarajan wrote:We ask to Eurussia for professionality.

This is not a place for propaganda, this is the WA Council.
And we wish to reiterate that New Tarajan has already demonstrated its genuine commitment for peace by organizing the only recognized Conference on this same issue; something that Eurussia seems to completely ignore, also in the draft it has proposed.

Thank you.

New Tarajan wrote:It is obvious that Eurussia prefers not to understand the reasons of who oppose it.

This bill is ILLEGAL, for the following reasons:

- violation of many sovereign rights expressed by the WA Constitution;

- lack of consent of the Kennyland Government over the intervention;

This is not a bill for peace: this is bill for your interests, Eurussia. Do not offend our intelligence, and do not overestimate our patience.
Thank you.

New Tarajan wrote:Don't worry. We believe the vote of the Council will be already sufficient to demonstrate the solidity of our position.
In case, we will bring it to the Court.

New Tarajan wrote:Your lack of response perfectly clarify the validity of our position.
There's nothing more to add.
Thank you very much.

Ireland wrote:We are AGAINST this proposal.And Eurussia you might be disappointed with my vote but it is my opinion, not yours.

New-Zealand wrote:Simple. Violation of KennyLand's sovereign rights. He wasn't even present for the Moscow Conference. Therefore I'm going to have to vote AGAINST