(Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

New-Zealand wrote:
I'm just going to say a quick thing here, I hope you don't mind Eurasia, but unless KennyLand is present (by his own free will), Dromoda has absolutely no chance of winning the case. This is, as Eurasia said, a Civil dispute, not a criminal one (KennyLand has violated no laws). As a result the case can only proceed if KennyLand is both present AND agrees for the case to go ahead. If he doesn't do both of those things, Dromoda can not push forward the case as he has no legal claims over the islands. His claims are RP based, and thus they hold no real merit in the court. If you insist Eurussia, the case can be left open, but it will probably just end up remaining idle forever until it's finally closed. 

The logical option would be to simply dismiss this case until KennyLand comes online once more and AGREES to give this case a go, as the case would actually be an RP thing rather than a OOC thing.

Europe and Asia wrote:KennyLand isn't here. I Telegrammed him and received no response. Thus, the case is still dismissed. Open another if you want to. This case is dismissed.

Furthermore, I believe this is the second time you have unlocked a thread I specifically ordered locked without the instructions of anyone on the Court or in any other position of power. Consider this your second warning before it is considered abuse of power.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Europe and Asia wrote:KennyLand isn't here. I Telegrammed him and received no response. Thus, the case is still dismissed. Open another if you want to. This case is dismissed.

Furthermore, I believe this is the second time you have unlocked a thread I specifically ordered locked without the instructions of anyone on the Court or in any other position of power. Consider this your second warning before it is considered abuse of power.

Again, I'm sorry but Eurussia believes that there is no reason to dismiss the case. The prosecuting Party is active, hence, why not the tribunal asks for evidences from the Prosecuting Party?

Europe and Asia wrote:

Great Eurussia wrote:

Europe and Asia wrote:KennyLand isn't here. I Telegrammed him and received no response. Thus, the case is still dismissed. Open another if you want to. This case is dismissed.

Furthermore, I believe this is the second time you have unlocked a thread I specifically ordered locked without the instructions of anyone on the Court or in any other position of power. Consider this your second warning before it is considered abuse of power.

Again, I'm sorry but Eurussia believes that there is no reason to dismiss the case. The prosecuting Party is active, hence, why not the tribunal asks for evidences from the Prosecuting Party?

Because the Defending Party isn't here. When (if) KennyLand comes on, the Court case will have to be reinstated.

I haven't asked for your evidence because receiving it wouldn't do anything. KennyLand still isn't here, thus the case cannot continue. When he is here, the case will be reopened. Until then, it is dismissed.

Europe and Asia wrote:

Great Eurussia wrote:

Europe and Asia wrote:KennyLand isn't here. I Telegrammed him and received no response. Thus, the case is still dismissed. Open another if you want to. This case is dismissed.

Furthermore, I believe this is the second time you have unlocked a thread I specifically ordered locked without the instructions of anyone on the Court or in any other position of power. Consider this your second warning before it is considered abuse of power.

Again, I'm sorry but Eurussia believes that there is no reason to dismiss the case. The prosecuting Party is active, hence, why not the tribunal asks for evidences from the Prosecuting Party?

Because the Defending Party isn't here. When (if) KennyLand comes on, the Court case will have to be reinstated.

I haven't asked for your evidence because receiving it wouldn't do anything. KennyLand still isn't here, thus the case cannot continue. When he is here, the case will be reopened. Until then, it is dismissed.

Europe and Asia wrote:This case is dismissed.

KennyLand isn't here. Per the Revised Judicial Protocol Act Section I Part 2, "But if any of the party refuses and if the court finds the complaint to possess probable cause containing obvious violations to the WA Constitution or any legally enforced agreement, the case shall proceed regardless of the refusal." As KennyLand has "refused" to come to Court, and the Court has not found any illegal wrongdoings on his part nor Dromoda's part, the case will not proceed. This is a civil lawsuit and the defendant has failed to show any illegal actions on the part of KennyLand.

Thus, the case is dismissed.

OOC:I advise you, Eurussia, to stop being so arrogant. You will not always get what you want.

Europe and Asia wrote:The Court maintains its stance. When, if, KennyLand comes onto the forum, this case will be reopened. Until then, this is dismissed. Please respect this decision or we will find you in contempt of the Court.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Europe and Asia wrote:The Court maintains its stance. When, if, KennyLand comes onto the forum, this case will be reopened. Until then, this is dismissed. Please respect this decision or we will find you in contempt of the Court.

Thank you. And we continue to hope that Eurasia and Ivania will inhibit from the case eventually citing their public support to Kennyland. As we await for that time, Eurussia thanks the Court for recognizing our arguments. Thank you very much.