(Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Great Eurussia Sun Jun 01, 2014 8:31 pm

JILLIN ISLAND SOVEREIGNTY DISPUTE

People's Republic of Dromoda vs Monarchy of Kennyland

To the WA Court of Justice, it has been known to the entire world that the People's Republic of Dromoda has a standing dispute over the northernmost island of the former occupant of today's Monarchy of Kennyland, with which inherited that disputed territory known today in Kennyland ad Jylln Island while in Dromoda as Jillin Island. And such dispute has remained dormant for several years contributing to the peace in Asia.

(Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland The_dispute_by_davehazekamp-d7jsq06

However, just recently, the People's Republic of Dromoda has revealed to the world that they have been seeking for a diplomatic dialogur with the Monarchy of Kennyland on the matter, to no avail. Thus, Dromoda resorted to raise the dispute internationally by publicly and openly warning Kennyland that it will take the disputed territory by force if if refuse to discuss the issue, once and for all. Hence, resulting to an escalation among the allies of the two nations involved in the Jillin Island Dispute.

Hence, with tensions rising in the Asian Continent due to military posturing and manuevers of the supports and sympathizers of Dromoda and Kennyland, the Moscow Peace Summit, composed of diplomats, ambassadors, and foreign ministers from Eurussia, Tokugawa, New Tarajan, Antanares, Eurasia, Havenburgh, Articmainia, Kaevi, Ireland, Ivania, New Zealand, Yellasia, & Dromoda, came up with all possible neutral and fairest solution on the dispute to convince the People's Republic of Dromoda not to militarize the dispute and wait for Kennyland.

Disputed Territory of Jillin Island: (NEUTRALIZATION)
- by diplomats of the Moscow Peace Summit

Citing the commendable internationalizing of dispute the People's Republic of Dromoda made to finally pressure the Monarchy of Kennyland to speak up on the matter and resolve the long simmering dispute once and for all to bring long lasting peace in the Asian Continent and neighboring regions, it is in our belief that we must seek the WA Government's intervention,

Whereas, citing that it is the duty of the WA Government to ensure peace and stability in the world under the WA Constitutition, it is therefore imperative that the WA Council must exercise its powers due to the actions of the directly involved nations, particularly Dromoda and Kennyland, where the latter continues to remain silent while the entire world is looking for a diplomatic solution and the former continues to maintain peace despite its obvious loosening patience of the dispute.

With these, it is now high time for the WA Council to authorize the WA Armed Forces, to bring peacekeeping neutral forced in Jillin Island, the WA Department of Security & Justice, to bring civilian peace and order in Jillin Island, and the WA Humanitarian Organization, to bring humanitarian assistance in Jillin Island, thus temporarily making the disputed Jillin Island under the mandate of the WA Government.

This neutral status quo must be maintained until such time that Kennyland and Dromoda becomes ready to peacefully and diplomatically resolve the matter through bilateral talks or through arbitration before the WA Court of Justice. And any external party violating this status quo shall be considered a crime against the international communitt through the WA Government and blatant violation of the WA Constitution who mandated the WA Council to maintain peace and stability in the world.

And as you will see, with the 13 countries involved in the Moscow Peace Summit, including Dromoda, and notably with the absence of Kennyland, it was indeed extremely hard for the negotiations to move forward. Luckily, we were able to come up with 5 possible solutions, FIRST, is the neutralization, SECOND, is the equitable division, THIRD, is the equitable sharing, and FOURTH, is the free and independent territory under shared regime, where Dromoda, the present between the two disputing Parties, fortunately adopted the Second Option.

And being halfway through the resolution of the dispute, the Moscow Peace Summit patiently waited for Kennyland after all repeated correspondences for communications. We were also hopeful when the Tarajani diplomats made an assurance that Kennyland will voice its opinion, which never materialized. Unfortunately, the peaceful status quo was threatened to be changed when several nations involved in the Summit performed military maneuvers and posturing in the disputed territory that escalated the tensions which we were concerned that might result into miscalculation and an armed conflict. Hence, the Moscow Peace Summit was forced to issue a consensus based ultimatum to Kennyland to share its views and position, since throughout the Summit, it has blatantly neglected each and everyone's plea. With the two ultimatums finally lapses without any single response from Kennyland, the diplomats took the final approach. And for transparency's sake, here is the official transcript and official minutes of the lengthy and tense Moscow Peace Summit.

Hence, the Moscow Peace Summit performed its agreed and consensus based final resort to the long simmering and escalating tensions over the Jillin Island dispute, and that is our First Option, the neutralization which we presented to all of you above. Therefore, Eurussia, as the convenor of the Moscow Peace Summit, and a member of the WA Council, with our aims to peacefully end this dispute to avoid a war and the possibility of third parties taking advantage of the status quo that could result into an armed conflict. It is our belief, in behalf of all the countries involved in the Summit, that this is the most durable, fairest, and most neutral solution to this dispute to bring its closure with peace and stability in the world with intervention from the WA Council, through the WAAF, WADSJ, and WAHO, as mandated and sanctioned by the WA Constitution.

Being directly involved in trying to come up with the solution for the dispute, in support to the Moscow Peace Summit's move at the WA Council, in behalf as well with the 13 countries directly involved, we see that with the blatant snub of Kennyland on the efforts for peace in the dispute and the blatant aggressiveness of Dromoda to impose its sovereignty on the disputed territory, and with the aggressiveness as well of those nations supporting the two sides by way of military maneuvers and posturing that all contribute to instability in the Asian Continent, we do believe that the issue of sovereignty can only be resolved by compelling Dromoda and Kennyland to finally prove their claims on the disputed Jillin Island. And in furtherance of maintaining the peaceful status quo, we do believe that the Court shall also affirm the role of the WAAF, WADSJ, and WAHO, in ensuring the peace over the disputed territory of the Jillim Island.

We hope for the immediate conclusion of this case to finally bring a closure to this dispute, for the sole benefit of all nations and states of the World Alliance.

Europe and Asia Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:41 am

It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

Great Eurussia Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:17 am

Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

We would like to inform the honourable Court that this case was brought before the Court of Justice under the auspices of the Moscow Peace Summit.

Also, why is the Court of Justice waiting for Dromoda, but not Kennyland? We have filed a case and it is the duty of the Court to attend to it. We are also wondering why is it immediately subject for dismissal?

Europe and Asia Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:29 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

We would like to inform the honourable Court that this case was brought before the Court of Justice under the auspices of the Moscow Peace Summit.
Also, why is the Court of Justice waiting for Dromoda, but not Kennyland? We have filed a case and it is the duty of the Court to attend to it. We are also wondering why is it immediately subject for dismissal?

If the concerned parties are not present the case is irrelevant.

Dromoda Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:28 am

Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

our opinion is that this is ok with us.

Great Eurussia Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:23 pm

Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

our opinion is that this is ok with us.

But Dromoda has acknowledged the case. Thank you.

Great Eurussia Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:42 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

our opinion is that this is ok with us.

But Dromoda has acknowledged the case. Thank you.

May we know when Kennyland will come?
Or at least the status of this case?
With all due respect.

Great Eurussia Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:19 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:It is the duty of Dromoda to bring this before the COJ, not you. We request Dromoda to post his opinions. Until then, this case has 24 hours before dismissal.

our opinion is that this is ok with us.

But Dromoda has acknowledged the case. Thank you.

May we know when Kennyland will come?
Or at least the status of this case?
With all due respect.

Anyone in the Court???

Europe and Asia Wed Jun 04, 2014 4:52 am

Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

Dromoda Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:12 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

the consequence's ???

someone??

well than we are forced in a position to do something

Europe and Asia Thu Jun 05, 2014 3:59 am

Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

the consequence's ???

someone??

well than we are forced in a position to do something

The Court informs Dromoda that any illegal action will result in legal consequences.

Dromoda Thu Jun 05, 2014 4:16 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

the consequence's ???

someone??

well than we are forced in a position to do something

The Court informs Dromoda that any illegal action will result in legal consequences.

we inform the court that it is an unwise decision take by the court to just dismiss this issue

Europe and Asia Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:15 am

Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

the consequence's ???

someone??

well than we are forced in a position to do something

The Court informs Dromoda that any illegal action will result in legal consequences.

we inform the court that it is an unwise decision take by the court to just dismiss this issue

The Court informs Dromoda that is has absolutely no knowledge of judicial proceedings. The Court cannot force an issue if the defendant isn't present. That violates judicial principles. If KennyLand is present, we can resolve the issue. Likewise, we would Dromoda wasn't present, we would also dismiss the case.

Dromoda Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:22 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

the consequence's ???

someone??

well than we are forced in a position to do something

The Court informs Dromoda that any illegal action will result in legal consequences.

we inform the court that it is an unwise decision take by the court to just dismiss this issue

The Court informs Dromoda that is has absolutely no knowledge of judicial proceedings. The Court cannot force an issue if the defendant isn't present. That violates judicial principles. If KennyLand is present, we can resolve the issue. Likewise, we would Dromoda wasn't present, we would also dismiss the case.

Than we blame the court for the violations we're gonna make because this court has the power to stop it. if court does not stop this( and we give that responsibility to you as the one representing the court) we do not have a choice.

thank you for adding the water that broke our dam.

Europe and Asia Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:34 am

The Court requests that the Dromodian Representative be quiet and leave the courtroom.

OOC: Are you threatening me? And furthermore, blaming the court for not giving you the outcome you wanted is asinine in the extreme. If you make any move towards KennyLand, you know the consequences on your nation will be dire. Be sensible.

Thank you for signalling your true intentions.

Dromoda Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:50 am

Europe and Asia wrote:The Court requests that the Dromodian Representative be quiet and leave the courtroom.

OOC: Are you threatening me? And furthermore, blaming the court for not giving you the outcome you wanted is asinine in the extreme. If you make any move towards KennyLand, you know the consequences on your nation will be dire. Be sensible.

Thank you for signalling your true intentions.

We will leave!
with blood on the floor of the court.

OOC: no

Europe and Asia Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:14 am

Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:The Court requests that the Dromodian Representative be quiet and leave the courtroom.

OOC: Are you threatening me? And furthermore, blaming the court for not giving you the outcome you wanted is asinine in the extreme. If you make any move towards KennyLand, you know the consequences on your nation will be dire. Be sensible.

Thank you for signalling your true intentions.

We will leave!
with blood on the floor of the court.

OOC: no

At this time I request the WADSJ Police Cordon to remove the Dromodian Representatives before they become violent. Thank you.

This case is adjourned. Eurussia, please lock the thread.

Great Eurussia Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:04 am

Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed]

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

Why not wait for the Monarchy of Kennyland? The Court didn't even publicly asked for Kennyland's response on this case? We do also believe that dismissal is illegal on the basis that it violates Dromoda's rights to be heard. Furthermore, Kennyland has not yet accepted nor rejected the case. So there is absolutely no reason to dismiss.

And Eurussia, as the filer and initiator of the case, and having Dromoda participate, invokes its constitutional rights for a fair trial under the WA Constitution and the Revised Judicial Protocol Act.

Europe and Asia Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:18 am

Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

The Court informs Eurussia that the defense, KennyLand is not present. Due to this being a civil trial and not a criminal one, the lack of the defendant constitutes dismissal of the case. We cannot force KennyLand to be here. Furthermore, KennyLand also has the right to a fair trial, which this would not be if he wasn't present. More, it has been several days and he has not been on NS at all, nor has he visited the forums.

Thus, the case is dismissed. You'll have to find a way to get KennyLand to be present.

Great Eurussia Thu Jun 05, 2014 1:33 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

The Court informs Eurussia that the defense, KennyLand is not present. Due to this being a civil trial and not a criminal one, the lack of the defendant constitutes dismissal of the case. We cannot force KennyLand to be here. Furthermore, KennyLand also has the right to a fair trial, which this would not be if he wasn't present. More, it has been several days and he has not been on NS at all, nor has he visited the forums.

Thus, the case is dismissed. You'll have to find a way to get KennyLand to be present.

Eurussia believes that there is no law categorizing a case whether it is criminal or civil, as we are dealing with an international case between states. Furthermore, it is the duty of the Court of Justice to compel all Parties to accept or reject the case, so declaring a presumption that a lack of defendant can dismiss a case is baseless.

So therefore, this case, it may take years, but cannot be dismissed as there is no existing law justifying such acts that is detrimental to the two other Parties.

New-Zealand Thu Jun 05, 2014 1:58 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Citing the absence of KennyLand, this case is Dismissed

OOC: I'd like to find a solution to this, but KennyLand isn't here, and we can't force him to come onto NS. Thus, case is dismissed.

The Court informs Eurussia that the defense, KennyLand is not present. Due to this being a civil trial and not a criminal one, the lack of the defendant constitutes dismissal of the case. We cannot force KennyLand to be here. Furthermore, KennyLand also has the right to a fair trial, which this would not be if he wasn't present. More, it has been several days and he has not been on NS at all, nor has he visited the forums.

Thus, the case is dismissed. You'll have to find a way to get KennyLand to be present.

Eurussia believes that there is no law categorizing a case whether it is criminal or civil, as we are dealing with an international case between states. Furthermore, it is the duty of the Court of Justice to compel all Parties to accept or reject the case, so declaring a presumption that a lack of defendant can dismiss a case is baseless.
So therefore, this case, it may take years, but cannot be dismissed as there is no existing law justifying such acts that is detrimental to the two other Parties.

I'm just going to say a quick thing here, I hope you don't mind Eurasia, but unless KennyLand is present (by his own free will), Dromoda has absolutely no chance of winning the case. This is, as Eurasia said, a Civil dispute, not a criminal one (KennyLand has violated no laws). As a result the case can only proceed if KennyLand is both present AND agrees for the case to go ahead. If he doesn't do both of those things, Dromoda can not push forward the case as he has no legal claims over the islands. His claims are RP based, and thus they hold no real merit in the court. If you insist Eurussia, the case can be left open, but it will probably just end up remaining idle forever until it's finally closed.

The logical option would be to simply dismiss this case until KennyLand comes online once more and AGREES to give this case a go, as the case would actually be an RP thing rather than a OOC thing.

New Tarajan Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:42 pm

Sorry if I interrupt, but I wish to add only one small element to the discussion: the absence of Kennyland could be easily interpreted by the Court as refusal to acknowledge the case.
We know, of course, that this is not the case but, if the Court uses this interpretation, and I believe it would be fair at least to say that Kennyland did not acknowledge this case, then the case is automatically dismissed, as Eurussia himself gladly demonstrated to us in this occasion.

United States of Europe Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:57 pm

As Secretary General of the WA-DSJ, I remember to the Honourable Representatives of Dromoda not threaten anymore, because, by doing so, they would face to the crime of contempt of Court. No matter how big and powerful is your nation, NO ONE here has the power to threaten someone. It is pure and simple civilization, and at the same time we proceed with the removal of Honorable Representatives of Dromoda from the building as required by the Court.
Thank you.

Europe and Asia Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:26 am

New Zealand, please change this to "dismissed" and lock the thread.

New-Zealand Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:33 pm

Sponsored content

(Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

(Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Eurussian Position

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland

Re: (Dismissed) Dromoda vs Kennyland