World Alliance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China

5 posters

Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:52 pm

The Loxan government has decided to call for the removal of China China from the Security Council for the violation of the Nuclear Test Ban Act, quoting that "All political entities, nations, countries or institutions are prohibited to carry out... any other nuclear explosion in any place or any environment." The Chinese² government has recently attacked Xarax with a nuclear missile and has thereby violated the law by causing a nuclear explosion.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:21 pm

Xolox wrote:The Loxan government has decided to call for the removal of China China from the Security Council for the violation of the Nuclear Test Ban Act, quoting that "All political entities, nations, countries or institutions are prohibited to carry out... any other nuclear explosion in any place or any environment." The Chinese² government has recently attacked Xarax with a nuclear missile and has thereby violated the law by causing a nuclear explosion.


This shall be known as 'Xolox vs China China'


Please note that this matter will be handled by the Tenth Security Council under its JUDICIAL AUTHORITY. Thus, at this stage, only the People's Republic of China China and the Grand Empire of Xolox may get involved in this issue.

I will inform the council if it's time to vote for verdict.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:29 pm

The SC requests the People's Republic of China China to reply in two (2) days.


So ordered.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:54 pm

China China wrote:China China wants to represent Asia in Security Council. Please do not remove me from Security Council because I want to be like to real China. I only declare war because I want to experience RP here. I promise not to do war anymore. Please!!
That is not an acceptable defense against my accusations.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:43 pm

China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:
China China wrote:China China wants to represent Asia in Security Council. Please do not remove me from Security Council because I want to be like to real China. I only declare war because I want to experience RP here. I promise not to do war anymore. Please!!
That is not an acceptable defense against my accusations.

Please forgive China China.
Your acts are unforgivable.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:54 am

He has made no defense and I don't think he intends to/can. I believe we are ready for the recommendation (China China may correct me if I'm wrong).
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:49 pm

Xolox wrote:He has made no defense and I don't think he intends to/can. I believe we are ready for the recommendation (China China may correct me if I'm wrong).


The SC requests the People's Republic of China China to reply in two (2) days.


So ordered.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:33 pm

China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:The Loxan government has decided to call for the removal of China China from the Security Council for the violation of the Nuclear Test Ban Act, quoting that "All political entities, nations, countries or institutions are prohibited to carry out... any other nuclear explosion in any place or any environment." The Chinese² government has recently attacked Xarax with a nuclear missile and has thereby violated the law by causing a nuclear explosion.

We are now for peace and I think the law do not say that if you violate it you can be remove from Security Council this is my defense and it say that it only ban nuclear test and not nuclear attack. Give us another chance.
You wanting peace now does not absolve you of your past crimes. There aren't any punishments listed, do you think that means your crime will go unpunished? The law clearly states that causing nuclear explosions is illegal, which is what you did in Xarax.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Snarfian Federation Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:57 am

What happend at Xarax was indeed unforgivable but Snarfia want's to give China China one more change so we say: ABSTAIN
Snarfian Federation
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:26 pm

Both Parties are given one (1) day if they still have further arguments. If there is none, the SC will issue its conclusion and recommendation for verdict.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Conclusion & Recommendation

Post  Great Eurussia Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:02 pm

Without no further arguments on the case, the Security Council is pleased to announce the following:


Conclusion: The Grand Empire of Xolox has filed a case against the People's Republic of China China for violating the WA Nuclear Test Ban Act by way of creating a nuclear explosion which is prohibited by the international law. The latter justified that the WA NTB Act did not specify that violation of its provision is tantamount to removal from the Security Council, which is true, and the WA NTB Act only prohibits nuclear tests and not nuclear attacks, which is debatable. 

However, the SC concludes that the WA NTB Act may have not specifically ban a nuclear attack based on its title, BUT, its provisions are clear that any form of explosion caused by nuclear weapons or nuclear test are globally banned WHICH qualifies the complaint of the Grand Empire of Xolox against the People's Republic of China China that the latter's nuclear missile attack on the former has violated the WA NTB Act.

Furthermore, the formal defense of the People's Republic of China China that there is no provision on the WA NTB Act saying that violation of it can remove a nation state from the Security Council is accepted by the SC. Hence, the request of the Grand Empire of Xolox to remove the People's Republic of China China from the Security Council is unjustifiable based on the WA NTB Act.


Recommendation: The People's Republic of China China is hereby instead fined €100 billion euros payable to the Grand Empire of Xolox in ten years (roleplay) time as compensation for the damages the former caused to the citizens of the Grand Empire of Xolox. Thus, it is now upon the decision of the Security Council, acting under its judicial authority, to approve or reject the Official Recommendation on the case.


A public vote is hereby called to order.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Eurussian Vote

Post  Great Eurussia Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:02 pm

Eurussia is in favor.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Xolox Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:08 pm

Xolox supports this decision.
Xolox
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 26
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  DPRNK Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:00 pm

Against we support our ally China
DPRNK
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Snarfian Federation Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:45 am

Favor
Snarfian Federation
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Serenarea Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:25 am

Serenarea abstains
Serenarea
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:10 pm

The voting period will end in one (1) day and all uncast votes will be considered abstentions.

So far the STATUS OF VOTES are:
Pending - (4) - Articmainia, Chivalry, Zanland, Muchos Estados Unidos

Yes - (3) - Eurussia, Xolox, Snarfia

No - (2) - China China, North Korreaa

Abstain - (1) - Serenarea


* NOTE: Seven votes are required for the verdict to effect.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Resolved

Post  Great Eurussia Tue Sep 30, 2014 11:32 am

The voting period will end in one (1) day and all uncast votes will be considered abstentions.

So far the STATUS OF VOTES are:
Yes - (3) - Eurussia, Xolox, Snarfia

No - (2) - China China, North Korreaa

Abstain - (5) - Serenarea, Articmainia, Chivalry, Zanland, Muchos Estados Unidos


* NOTE: Seven votes are required for the verdict to effect.


Citing the resolution of the Security Council, the case has been resolved.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Resolved) Xolox vs China China Empty Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs China China

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum