Re: (ZAR) Zaristic League of Trade

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:25 am

Azotakza wrote:but you still have to have someone vote for you. also i'm on the head of court right now so voting for me throws away votes

So the head of court is a separate election?

Xolox Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:26 am

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Azotakza wrote:but you still have to have someone vote for you. also i'm on the head of court right now so voting for me throws away votes

So the head of court is a separate election?

He said every two elections.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:26 am

Xolox wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Azotakza wrote:but you still have to have someone vote for you. also i'm on the head of court right now so voting for me throws away votes

So the head of court is a separate election?

He said every two elections.

Thanks, must have missed that.

Azotakza Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:39 am

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Xolox wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Azotakza wrote:but you still have to have someone vote for you. also i'm on the head of court right now so voting for me throws away votes

So the head of court is a separate election?

He said every two elections.

Thanks, must have missed that.

No you didn't miss out, the first one I just established myself as the head so we could get things working.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:44 am

Azotakza wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Xolox wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Azotakza wrote:but you still have to have someone vote for you. also i'm on the head of court right now so voting for me throws away votes

So the head of court is a separate election?

He said every two elections.

Thanks, must have missed that.

No you didn't miss out, the first one I just established myself as the head so we could get things working.

I meant missed where you said the Head of Court was elected every 2 elections

Azotakza Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:46 am

Ah, well now you know.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Nov 25, 2014 10:56 am

I hereby motion to embargo [REDACTED] all member states of the WTU. After being accused of sinking a ZAR trade ship, not only did they fail to talk with us peacefully, they insulted us, embargoed us, and called us liars. After days of attempting to establish a sit down talk with them, they've repeatedly refused. In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo [REDACTED] Hopefully this will make them come to the table and actually talk to us respectfully. Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed. [REDACTED]

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

England and Wales Tue Nov 25, 2014 1:58 pm

I vote for the following:
Xolox
Shalk
Apepistan

Apepistan Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:51 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo and blockade. [...] Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed.

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

Apepistan proposes that we only embargo the WTU members. A blockade is not needed, obviously, we don't want to escalate this situation into an open conflict.

However, Eurussia is an observer state to the ZAR aswell and member of the WTU. Apepistan also signed a separate trade agreement with Eurussia. Therefore we propose that the WTU embargo will not include Eurussia.

We agree with the 2 weeks for naval escort.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Nov 25, 2014 6:45 pm

Apepistan wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo and blockade. [...] Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed.

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

Apepistan proposes that we only embargo the WTU members. A blockade is not needed, obviously, we don't want to escalate this situation into an open conflict.

However, Eurussia is an observer state to the ZAR aswell and member of the WTU. Apepistan also signed a separate trade agreement with Eurussia. Therefore we propose that the WTU embargo will not include Eurussia.

We agree with the 2 weeks for naval escort.

I agree. I've redacted my original proposal.

Xolox Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:15 am

Xolox wholeheartedly supports the motion to embargo the WTU.

Hungaria Nova Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:29 pm

The Royal Novan government accepts the proposal of the embargo of WTU's consumer goods and agrees the 2-week-long preventative escorting periond for out ships.

Hungaria Nova Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:31 pm

As the election has been started, the Novan governmetn made a decision to support the following stated:

- Apepistan
- US of Scouting
- Xolox

Great Eurussia Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:21 pm

Apepistan wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo and blockade. [...] Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed.

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

Apepistan proposes that we only embargo the WTU members. A blockade is not needed, obviously, we don't want to escalate this situation into an open conflict.

However, Eurussia is an observer state to the ZAR aswell and member of the WTU. Apepistan also signed a separate trade agreement with Eurussia. Therefore we propose that the WTU embargo will not include Eurussia.

We agree with the 2 weeks for naval escort.

Eurussia, as a responsible observer state of the ZAR, and a responsible and impartial member of the WTU, requests that our country be exempted from this unilateral action of the ZAR Member States as we are in no way have any form of participation nor involvement to the tensions that have been transpiring between ZAR and WTU.

Eurussia is only focused on trade and economy.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Fri Nov 28, 2014 1:07 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Apepistan wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo and blockade. [...] Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed.

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

Apepistan proposes that we only embargo the WTU members. A blockade is not needed, obviously, we don't want to escalate this situation into an open conflict.

However, Eurussia is an observer state to the ZAR aswell and member of the WTU. Apepistan also signed a separate trade agreement with Eurussia. Therefore we propose that the WTU embargo will not include Eurussia.

We agree with the 2 weeks for naval escort.

Eurussia, as a responsible observer state of the ZAR, and a responsible and impartial member of the WTU, requests that our country be exempted from this unilateral action of the ZAR Member States as we are in no way have any form of participation nor involvement to the tensions that have been transpiring between ZAR and WTU.
Eurussia is only focused on trade and economy.

This is what we've decided on, just waiting on more votes and for it to become official from Azotakza.

Kingdom of Scottlands Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:58 am

Scottlands has accepted a proposal from Great Eurussia for the summit in Moscow city.

Apepistan Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:11 pm

Republic of Scottlands wrote:Scottlands has accepted a proposal from Great Eurussia for the summit in Moscow city.

Finally we can begin a constructive discussion.

UnitedStatesOfScouting Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:37 pm

It's nearing the end of the week, when can we expect the outcome of the election?

Great Eurussia Fri Nov 28, 2014 10:36 pm

Following the agreement between Apepistan (for ZAR) and Scottlands (for WTU) to hold talks, Eurussia invites the member states of this organization to send their officials to Moscow to represent their interests and voice their opinions.

https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t517p165-moscow-peace-summit#24059

Muchos Estados Unidos Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:40 pm

Apepistan wrote:The United Kingdoms of Apepistan propose that Muchos Estados Unidos will be in observer status until her diplomatic and inner conflicts are solved.

I want to join as full member!!!

UnitedStatesOfScouting Sat Nov 29, 2014 3:42 pm

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:
Apepistan wrote:The United Kingdoms of Apepistan propose that Muchos Estados Unidos will be in observer status until her diplomatic and inner conflicts are solved.

I want to join as full member!!!

You were already accepted on page 3, Apepistan missed that though. I also condemn your war against Great Eurussia.

Apepistan Sat Nov 29, 2014 4:21 pm

((OOC: Yes, I missed that, sorry about it!))

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:28 am

I have resigned from Shadaloo, so ZAR is currently my only organization. Furthermore, it's now next week. Are we going to hear anything about the Patricians?

EDIT: I see the list was changed, just no announcement. Congrats to the new Patricians!

UnitedStatesOfScouting Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:33 am

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:I hereby motion to embargo [REDACTED] all member states of the WTU. After being accused of sinking a ZAR trade ship, not only did they fail to talk with us peacefully, they insulted us, embargoed us, and called us liars. After days of attempting to establish a sit down talk with them, they've repeatedly refused. In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo [REDACTED] Hopefully this will make them come to the table and actually talk to us respectfully. Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed. [REDACTED]

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

As it stands, we currently have 3 votes FOR and none AGAINST. I ask that all member states cast their votes soon. We require 6 votes for a majority which means we only need 3 more votes.

~~Embargo Proposal~~

FOR: (3)
United States of Scouting
Hungaria Nova
Snarfia

AGAINST: (1)
Omega Atlantica

PENDING: (3)
Apepistan
Xolox
Azotakza

Snarfian Federation Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:35 am

Sponsored content

(ZAR) Zaristic League of Trade