(Withdrawn) Scottlands vs Eurussia

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:His Majesty, King Ferdinand of the House of Bourbon, by instructing the Scottish Government leaded by Lord Cameron is filing a defamation case against Great Eurussia, its leaders Chancellor Vladimir Putin for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people. They has repeatedly insulted the King and one of the evidence is this here - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30560 after that our government demanded a public apology evidence here - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30597 and the leader of Eu is ready to accept the case this is evidence - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30612


His Majesty wants justice for bullied nations like us. His Majesty knows that we have freedom of speech but defaming a leader should not be given exemption. There must be punishment.

United States of Ireland wrote:With the submission of evidence from Scottlands we give Eurussia THREE days to submit evidence in his defense

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:His Majesty, King Ferdinand of the House of Bourbon, by instructing the Scottish Government leaded by Lord Cameron is filing a defamation case against Great Eurussia, its leaders Chancellor Vladimir Putin for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people. They has repeatedly insulted the King and one of the evidence is this here - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30560 after that our government demanded a public apology evidence here - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30597 and the leader of Eu is ready to accept the case this is evidence - https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t893p120-wa-international-news-network#30612


His Majesty wants justice for bullied nations like us. His Majesty knows that we have freedom of speech but defaming a leader should not be given exemption. There must be punishment.

This is our case and I believe this is strong enough to punish EU for disrespecting our great leader. I hope the court will not be influenced by the power of EU. We should unite in dismantling imperialism and aggression.

United States of Ireland wrote:On the 9th of September the Kingdom of Scottlands presented a case to the World Alliance Security Council claiming that the Empire of Great Eurussia in what was described as “for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people.” Evidence was provided in which Scottlands claimed that Eurussia defamed Scottlands by 1. Denying supposed historical land, with no evidence to support this claim, known by Eurussia as Gibraltar and by Scottlands as Ushten Island. Scottlands went on further to say that defamation is a crime and Eurussia should be punished.

The opinion of the Council is as follows. After reviewing the laws of the World Alliance we find that defamation is not a crime as proclaimed by the Kingdom of Scottlands. We further find that Scottlands did not provide proper citations that Eurussia had indeed defamed the leader of Scottlands. Upon reviewing all documents submitted we find that Eurussia never came close to defaming Scottlands, its Leader, or her people. Furthermore we find that Scottlands is in violation of Section 1 of the WASC Act by claiming rule over the Duchy of Gibraltar. Which is obvious territory of the Empire of Great Eurussia. So it is in the opinion of the Council that if Scottlands does not stop it’s illegal claims and actions he shall be charged by the WASC. Finally it is the request of this assembled council that the World Alliance Security Council not be used as a pawn for personal political gain.

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:

United States of Ireland wrote:On the 9th of September the Kingdom of Scottlands presented a case to the World Alliance Security Council claiming that the Empire of Great Eurussia in what was described as “for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people.” Evidence was provided in which Scottlands claimed that Eurussia defamed Scottlands by 1. Denying supposed historical land, with no evidence to support this claim, known by Eurussia as Gibraltar and by Scottlands as Ushten Island. Scottlands went on further to say that defamation is a crime and Eurussia should be punished.

The opinion of the Council is as follows. After reviewing the laws of the World Alliance we find that defamation is not a crime as proclaimed by the Kingdom of Scottlands. We further find that Scottlands did not provide proper citations that Eurussia had indeed defamed the leader of Scottlands. Upon reviewing all documents submitted we find that Eurussia never came close to defaming Scottlands, its Leader, or her people. Furthermore we find that Scottlands is in violation of Section 1 of the WASC Act by claiming rule over the Duchy of Gibraltar. Which is obvious territory of the Empire of Great Eurussia. So it is in the opinion of the Council that if Scottlands does not stop it’s illegal claims and actions he shall be charged by the WASC. Finally it is the request of this assembled council that the World Alliance Security Council not be used as a pawn for personal political gain.

This is unfair. Why are you threatening me of WASC charges? I am a WASC member. And why are you involving the territorial dispute of Ushten Island? This is not about it. You are a close ally of Eurussia so you must inhibit from this case.

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:

United States of Ireland wrote:On the 9th of September the Kingdom of Scottlands presented a case to the World Alliance Security Council claiming that the Empire of Great Eurussia in what was described as “for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people.” Evidence was provided in which Scottlands claimed that Eurussia defamed Scottlands by 1. Denying supposed historical land, with no evidence to support this claim, known by Eurussia as Gibraltar and by Scottlands as Ushten Island. Scottlands went on further to say that defamation is a crime and Eurussia should be punished.

The opinion of the Council is as follows. After reviewing the laws of the World Alliance we find that defamation is not a crime as proclaimed by the Kingdom of Scottlands. We further find that Scottlands did not provide proper citations that Eurussia had indeed defamed the leader of Scottlands. Upon reviewing all documents submitted we find that Eurussia never came close to defaming Scottlands, its Leader, or her people. Furthermore we find that Scottlands is in violation of Section 1 of the WASC Act by claiming rule over the Duchy of Gibraltar. Which is obvious territory of the Empire of Great Eurussia. So it is in the opinion of the Council that if Scottlands does not stop it’s illegal claims and actions he shall be charged by the WASC. Finally it is the request of this assembled council that the World Alliance Security Council not be used as a pawn for personal political gain.

This is unfair. Why are you threatening me of WASC charges? I am a WASC member. And why are you involving the territorial dispute of Ushten Island? This is not about it. You are a close ally of Eurussia so you must inhibit from this case.

United States of Ireland wrote:

Kingdom of Scottlands wrote:

United States of Ireland wrote:On the 9th of September the Kingdom of Scottlands presented a case to the World Alliance Security Council claiming that the Empire of Great Eurussia in what was described as “for slandering the name of the great leader and monarch of the Scottish people.” Evidence was provided in which Scottlands claimed that Eurussia defamed Scottlands by 1. Denying supposed historical land, with no evidence to support this claim, known by Eurussia as Gibraltar and by Scottlands as Ushten Island. Scottlands went on further to say that defamation is a crime and Eurussia should be punished.

The opinion of the Council is as follows. After reviewing the laws of the World Alliance we find that defamation is not a crime as proclaimed by the Kingdom of Scottlands. We further find that Scottlands did not provide proper citations that Eurussia had indeed defamed the leader of Scottlands. Upon reviewing all documents submitted we find that Eurussia never came close to defaming Scottlands, its Leader, or her people. Furthermore we find that Scottlands is in violation of Section 1 of the WASC Act by claiming rule over the Duchy of Gibraltar. Which is obvious territory of the Empire of Great Eurussia. So it is in the opinion of the Council that if Scottlands does not stop it’s illegal claims and actions he shall be charged by the WASC. Finally it is the request of this assembled council that the World Alliance Security Council not be used as a pawn for personal political gain.

This is unfair. Why are you threatening me of WASC charges? I am a WASC member. And why are you involving the territorial dispute of Ushten Island? This is not about it. You are a close ally of Eurussia so you must inhibit from this case.

If you didn't want territory brought up shouldn't of submitted it as evidence. The only reason you think corruption is involved is because it doesn't benefit you. I assure you there is no corruption involved. Deal with it.

United States of Ireland wrote:Point is defaming isn't a crime. There is nothing the Security Council can do about it. I will amend the verdict to remove land but other than that...