World Alliance
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

(Dismissed) Browera vs WA

+3
Ronald
Zakiristan.
Browera
7 posters

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down

(Dismissed) Browera vs WA - Page 3 Empty Re: (Dismissed) Browera vs WA

Post  Great Eurussia Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:48 pm

New-Zealand wrote:Sorry to crash the party eurussia but you have their external IP not their actual residential IP. the external IP is the same for everyone living in the same area using the same ISP. All you have done is merely track down the exchange. It is impossible to trace the residential IP as this is kept secure by the ISP inorder to ensure that pedofiles, stalkers etc. are not able to trace a victim to his/her house adress by simple IP tracking. For Example my IP is 60.234.190.91 use this tracker (http://www.iptrackeronline.com/) and you will find that it is a server housed just outside Mt Eden Prison right next to the railway (Orcon is a State Owned Company so it can use the Mt Eden Prison premises to house a exchange). Use this tracker (http://www.ip-tracker.org/) and you will see that my IP is the same as the host IP, this shows that you have infact traced my ISP not me, also look at the red area, this is the area where I could live and this is the area that the server covers. I think this I have said enough to render your evidence redundant.

I have asked my colleagues, which have thoroughly helped me on this, that are knowledgeable on matters like this which involves technical subjects such as IP addresses that the this argument raised by New Zealand are possible and the sole purpose of the forum's IP address detecting features are just for statistical purposes.

In view of this, our government hereby submits to this Court that in view of the arguments stated by Browera and Galesatum that they are not controlled by a single individual, we respectfully notify this Court that via our default powers of administering the recent elections, we are now forced to modify the results of the recently concluded Security Council election in which the grounds that these nations were disqualified are weak and doesn't constitute enough to consider that Browera and Galesatum are in fact controlled by a single individual.

Hence, Eurussia formally rests its case. We request the Court to formally close this case.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

(Dismissed) Browera vs WA - Page 3 Empty Re: (Dismissed) Browera vs WA

Post  Great Eurussia Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:43 pm

OOC: This has been considered as dismissed.
Great Eurussia
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum