Place to Fight

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Not related to the argument, but you wonder why I have a great dislike for you; yet, you called Imabstan (Texania) a retard. I'm sure that's one reason why.

Arveyres wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Not related to the argument, but you wonder why I have a great dislike for you; yet, you called Imabstan (Texania) a retard. I'm sure that's one reason why.

well hes acting like one.He may not be one but hes acting like one now.

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Let me make this simple.

My population on nationstates is 721 million.

My population on the NS tracker is 57 million.

721 divided by 57 million is 12.6 simplified.

Imabistan wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Let me make this simple.

My population on nationstates is 721 million.

My population on the NS tracker is 57 million.

721 divided by 57 million is 12.6 simplified.

your total military is 14,257 but your active duty is only 1,425
.All your info is correct but yoyr military is whats got me "confused".

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:

Imabistan wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Let me make this simple.

My population on nationstates is 721 million.

My population on the NS tracker is 57 million.

721 divided by 57 million is 12.6 simplified.

your total military is 14,257 but your active duty is only 1,425
.All your info is correct but yoyr military is whats got me "confused".

My military already is divided by ten in NS tracker. There is no need to make it divided by 100.

total:142,574

Active:14,257

ok i see your point now.

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:

Arveyres wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:No you didnt divide by ten just because you put 10% of your military in active duty doesnt mean shit.I know what I am doing i divide it in my head I do not have to put it on NS Tracker. My military says I have 430,000 in my military divide that by ten and I have 43,000.So please know what you are saying before you say it. No one likes a retard.

Not related to the argument, but you wonder why I have a great dislike for you; yet, you called Imabstan (Texania) a retard. I'm sure that's one reason why.

well hes acting like one.He may not be one but hes acting like one now.

How can you justify his actions to a derogatory term used upon those with uncontrollable mental illness/impairment? Try to get an expanded vocabulary.

I spend 40% of my budget on military.

The UK spends 2.5%.

I spend 2 trillion U.S dollars on defence.

The U.K spends 60.8 billion.

Evidence:


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

http://www.nstracker.net/texania&page=budgets

well darn Ireland irl spends only 1.1 Billion which is alot less theb my military budget

I'm not arguing with your figures over the size of your military. That's likely fine if your following the DBT rule. I'm saying the fact you say that Regornia captured 30% of your ships. The fact that you have so many makes this even more unrealistic.

Atletius wrote:I'm not arguing with your figures over the size of your military. That's likely fine if your following the DBT rule. I'm saying the fact you say that Regornia captured 30% of your ships. The fact that you have so many makes this even more unrealistic.

GB has 6 destroyers. I have 60.i spend 30x more than GB on military. It seems pretty proportional to me. Mainly the fact that rebels surprise attacked a military base that hasn't ever been included in any conflict is probably why it was captured so easily.

The whole idea a tiny rebel nation would somehow manage to take 30% a third of your ships is just really unrealistic. Reduce the number to something like 10 if that and it's a lot more realistic. Considering fleets are generally spilt between many many naval bases

ok can some one help me with this my total military budget is 615,846,312,900 Euros at least in my money it is my total active military which is what the budget goes to is 14,160.I think I have to divide my budget by ten. But I want to know how much I spend on each soldier.

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:ok can some one help me with this my total military budget is 615,846,312,900 Euros at least in my money it is my total active military which is what the budget goes to is 14,160.I think I have to divide my budget by ten. But I want to know how much I spend on each soldier.

It will be the same amount no matter if you divide by ten.


615,846,312,900 divided by 14,160

43,491,971 euro spent on each troop.

Atletius wrote:The whole idea a tiny rebel nation would somehow manage to take 30% a third of your ships is just really unrealistic. Reduce the number to something like 10 if that and it's a lot more realistic. Considering fleets are generally spilt between many many naval bases

It was our largest military base. 30,000 armed rebels could have easily taken over a base, due to our absence of gun laws.10,000 personnel defending would have been easily taken over.

Fine. Though I still maintain it's quite unrealistic.

Texania wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:ok can some one help me with this my total military budget is 615,846,312,900 Euros at least in my money it is my total active military which is what the budget goes to is 14,160.I think I have to divide my budget by ten. But I want to know how much I spend on each soldier.

It will be the same amount no matter if you divide by ten.


615,846,312,900 divided by 14,160

43,491,971 euro spent on each troop.

thanks. Thats good to me really good.

Atletius wrote:Fine. Though I still maintain it's quite unrealistic.

I see it as realistic...somewhat

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:

Texania wrote:

Great Empire of Ireland wrote:ok can some one help me with this my total military budget is 615,846,312,900 Euros at least in my money it is my total active military which is what the budget goes to is 14,160.I think I have to divide my budget by ten. But I want to know how much I spend on each soldier.

It will be the same amount no matter if you divide by ten.


615,846,312,900 divided by 14,160

43,491,971 euro spent on each troop.

thanks. Thats good to me really good.

No Problem.

i just derped majorly. they captured 5 Destroyers. They captured 20 Frigates, i am retarded.

I have the 82nd largest defense budget in the WA and in NS Dollars it is 663,250,000,000 so that divided by 14,160 is 46,839,689 and some odd cents

Aren't frigates larger than destroyers? That makes it a lot less realistic.

no, they are normally about 100 ft shorter (about 30 meters i think), and normally have less armour, and less firepower.

Texania wrote:

Atletius wrote:The whole idea a tiny rebel nation would somehow manage to take 30% a third of your ships is just really unrealistic. Reduce the number to something like 10 if that and it's a lot more realistic. Considering fleets are generally spilt between many many naval bases

It was our largest military base. 30,000 armed rebels could have easily taken over a base, due to our absence of gun laws.10,000 personnel defending would have been easily taken over.

Your largest military base is in Mnemosyne?? A place where you have never faced any military conflicts?? Not a place like Olympia where you constantly have Articmainia breathing down your neck?? (no offense Artic if you read this) And I feel like your military personnel would know better than to let the ships and supplies fall into enemy hands. They would have surely sank their ships and/or burned their supplies. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR LOGIC