(Consultations) Electing World Assembly Delegate

With the recent incident over the WA delegate I propose that we elect our WA delegate.
These might be the requirements

1. Be a member of this region and WA member (duh)
   
2. Have a certain amount of WA endorsements (maybe 90% of the WA delegate's endorsement
   

 

After elect one we have to withdraw a certain amount of endorsements from the current WA delegate.
Proposed by me and Marquette of Pacific

We should say that you can have no more than 10 less than the elected Delegate.

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:We should say that you can have no more than 10 less than the elected Delegate.

how about a percentage? 90% maybe
if so 0.90 X 48= 43.2 endorsements
Also we need a rule so that people can reach the requirements to get WA delegate, we don't want to lose to many endorsements.
maybe 85% to run for WA delegate?

What recent incident? I must have missed that

Planitan Union wrote:

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:We should say that you can have no more than 10 less than the elected Delegate.

how about a percentage? 90% maybe
if so 0.90 X 48= 43.2 endorsements
Also we need a rule so that people can reach the requirements to get WA delegate, we don't want to lose to many endorsements.
maybe 85% to run for WA delegate?

no i would just go with what Marquette said.

Atletius wrote:What recent incident? I must have missed that

Marquette replaced New Zealand as delegate

Ahh right. If I'm honest. I think that the current system of having whoever has the most endorsements works fine. I see no reason to add a extra level of complexity.

Atletius wrote:Ahh right. If I'm honest. I think that the current system of having whoever has the most endorsements works fine. I see no reason to add a extra level of complexity.

were already complex here...kinda

Neither Freedom Planita 2 nor Marquette of Pacific are in the WA Council. I do not believe non-council members are allowed to propose bills before the WA Council. Can someone please enlighten me of the veracity of this post.

Arveyres wrote:Neither Freedom Planita 2 nor Marquette of Pacific are in the WA Council. I do not believe non-council members are allowed to propose bills before the WA Council. Can someone please enlighten me of the veracity of this post.

This seemed the best place... There isn't a good official debateing place

Planitan Union wrote:

Arveyres wrote:Neither Freedom Planita 2 nor Marquette of Pacific are in the WA Council. I do not believe non-council members are allowed to propose bills before the WA Council. Can someone please enlighten me of the veracity of this post.

This seemed the best place... There isn't a good official debateing place

There should be

Arveyres wrote:Neither Freedom Planita 2 nor Marquette of Pacific are in the WA Council. I do not believe non-council members are allowed to propose bills before the WA Council. Can someone please enlighten me of the veracity of this post.

Hmm, good point, I think it goes against protocol for non-members to post bills, but there's nothing preventing me from making comments on the bill, so I'm not doing anything wrong.

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:

Arveyres wrote:Neither Freedom Planita 2 nor Marquette of Pacific are in the WA Council. I do not believe non-council members are allowed to propose bills before the WA Council. Can someone please enlighten me of the veracity of this post.

Hmm, good point, I think it goes against protocol for non-members to post bills, but there's nothing preventing me from making comments on the bill, so I'm not doing anything wrong.

back to the topic what do you guys think?

No, this needs to be sponsored by a council member, until then this bill is effectively worthless.

We really need a debating room -_-

Planitan Union wrote:We really need a debating room -_-

It's called the Regional Talks subforum. If you want to discuss an issue of legislation you want to bring to everyone's attention bring it to the Regional Talks, like what I did with the Map Reforms Committee.

Marquette (of Pacific) wrote:

Planitan Union wrote:We really need a debating room -_-

It's called the Regional Talks subforum. If you want to discuss an issue of legislation you want to bring to everyone's attention bring it to the Regional Talks, like what I did with the Map Reforms Committee.

It depends on the President if he allows other nations to join besides I see no issue as we are just in consultations. Nevertheless, I believe the way we elect a Delegate is fine.

Sorry if I intervene only now. I was quiet busy during these last days.

As President of the Council, I must agree with Arveyres and Eurasia. We must keep the rules on, or the Council would become a sort of "second Parliament", which is not. So, please, if you have any idea, ask to one delegate in the Council to sponsor it.