(Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
+9
Texania
Shirouma
Zackalantis
Europe and Asia
Marquette (of Pacific)
Arveyres
Ireland
Havenburgh
Great Eurussia
13 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Alright, the first no vote.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
the people's congress votes neutral
Dromoda- Potential World Power
- Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 29
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
The first vote for that too.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Havenburgh wrote:The first vote for that too.
we know too little to vote yes or no.
due to the lack of information we have no fair choice
Dromoda- Potential World Power
- Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 29
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Dromoda wrote:Havenburgh wrote:The first vote for that too.
we know too little to vote yes or no.
due to the lack of information we have no fair choice
Good point. Its due to his insctivity. And when he dies get ousted, right now only avyres and I are in line to get the spot
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Immediately following this poll, should it be successful, the region shall vote on the Justice to replace Chivalry, should he be removed.
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
I know. As far as I know, its gonna be either me or avyres.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Havenburgh wrote:I know. As far as I know, its gonna be either me or avyres.
I'm aware you know. I wasn't talking directly to you. It's my job to tell everyone, seeing as this is the COJ. Haven't we been over this already?
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Just telagram me please.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Havenburgh wrote:Just telagram me please.
Why? I have no current reason to. Is there something I should be aware of?
Europe and Asia- Emerging Power
- Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 49
Location : Ann Arbor, MI
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
I see a great hatred and rivalry growing among us.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Havenburgh wrote:I see a great hatred and rivalry growing among us.
Gentlemen Were in the Halls of justice.
please stay calm
Dromoda- Potential World Power
- Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 29
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Oh dont worry I am calm. i never get angry.Dromoda wrote:Havenburgh wrote:I see a great hatred and rivalry growing among us.
Gentlemen Were in the Halls of justice.
please stay calm
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
I do not see one, he is simply doing what he is required to do.Havenburgh wrote:I see a great hatred and rivalry growing among us.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
True. Im sorry E & A, it just seemed like you were attacking me.
Havenburgh- Powerbroker
- Posts : 119
Join date : 2013-10-08
Age : 27
Location : New York.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
So, gentlemen....as Dromoda said, we're in the Hall of Justice.
I'm more than sure that there wasn't an aggressive intention from no side.
I'm more than sure that there wasn't an aggressive intention from no side.
New Tarajan- Recognized Power
- Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy
My Removal
I don' understand why I should be removed from the court of justice, I am active, I just remain quiet until a problem arises and the I talk with the other to about the situation that we have to deal with. I am a neutral member with in the World Alliance, I listen to both sides of the problem and then send my thoughts on what to do. So I am requesting you to stop these proceedings and lets get back to more important work, instead of trying to kick out a person that refuses to actual take sides and willing to hear both sides of the story. I enjoy being a member of the World Alliance government and I want to continue.
Re: (Resolved) Chivalry Dismissal Referendum
Another that I noticed is that people that would want to take my place, I would be betting that they would side with their allies. I am sorry but I have to say that, stating that if i get ousted they they are next in line to be in the position, I have done my job, just because i am not on every single day here, i do have a job, school and a family and I enjoy being on here. so with that, I believe that if i am ousted that there is no reason to be on here as much as i am, I am not quitting the Alliance but I have never been anything but good to the people that have brought problems to the court, and this is how you get treated when you want to help people.
STATUS
Great Eurussia wrote:As the Secretary General, Eurussia hereby authorizes a regionwide referendum on the DIMISSAL OF CHIVALRY from the Court of Justice as the petitioners, MARQUETTE and HAVENBURGH, successfully achieves the needs for a dismissal vote as required under the WA Constitution.And for transparency, the petitioners and the initial supporters are as follows: Havenburgh, Marquette, New Tarajan, Ceveztria, Shirouma, and Carriebean.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you in favor of the dismissal of Chivalry?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The floor is now open for votes until the 22nd of April.NOTE: A simple majority over the total number of voting nations can put effect on the dismissal provided that there are at least 10 minimum participating/voting nations.
As the voting finally ends up, and with 7 in favor, 1 against, 1 abstain, and citing that under the WA Constitution, there must be a minimum of 10 participating countries during the dismissal vote and with only 9 participated at this period, the Secretary General hereby certifies that the Dismissal Referendum against Chivalry has FAILED. Thank you.
Thus, Chivalry will remain a member state of the WA Court of Justice.
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» (Petition) Dismissal of Chivalry
» (Dismissed) Realistic Population Act
» (Rejected) WA Constitutional Referendum
» (Dismissed) Criminal Offenses Act
» (Dismissed) Continentalization Act
» (Dismissed) Realistic Population Act
» (Rejected) WA Constitutional Referendum
» (Dismissed) Criminal Offenses Act
» (Dismissed) Continentalization Act
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum