(Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
+21
Juvor
Muchos Estados Unidos
The Holy Empire of Artite
I.S.I.S
Serenarea
Snarfian Federation
Shockwave
Apepistan
Kingdom of Ireland
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Azotakza
England and Wales
Shlask
Ebsotz
Great Eurussia
Kingdom of Scottlands
Xolox
New Rhodinia
DPRNK
South Macwick
Zanland
25 posters
Page 9 of 12
Page 9 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
NOTICE
Great Eurussia wrote:Wirbanskia wrote:Well with no conflicts I don't see why not right now.I.S.I.S wrote:I hope I could get a seat now. Please decide on it.
The WA Presidency will make a ruling on the pending motions, as requested.
NOTICE
Great Eurussia wrote:VACANT SEATS at the SECURITY COUNCIL
- ASIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- IBERIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- ARCADIA - secondary seat
- ATLANTIS - primary seat, secondary seat
- OCEANIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- OLYMPIA - secondary seat
- ANATOLIA - secondary seat
- ERYTHRAEA - primary seat, secondary seat
- MAGNESIA -
- POLYNESIA - secondary seat
- PHOENICIA - secondary seat
- MICRONESIA - secondary seat
- MNEMOSYNE - secondary seat
RULING
- STATUS: Due to competition with the bid of ISIS for the same seatTrinity Sector - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (under evaluation)
- 5 SC endorsements [New Korrea, Russia, Ebsotz, Snarfia, Wirbanskia]ISIS - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (under evaluation)
- 3 SC objections [Scouting, MEU, New Rhodinia]
- 1 Non-SC objection [Xolox]
- 1 non-SC endorsement [Trinity Sector]
- STATUS: Due to objections and new competition with Trinity Sector
- 4 SC endorsements [MEU, Ebsotz, Wirbanskia, Russia]Artite - for secondary seat of Arcadia (under evaluation)
- 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
- 1 SC objections [New Korrea]
- STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares, and competition with Apepistan
- 5 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Ebsotz, New Korrea]Apepistan - for secondary seat of Arcadia (under evaluation)
- STATUS: Due to competition with Artite
- 2 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, Scouting]Xolox - for primary seat of Oceania (under evaluation)
- 1 SC objections [New Korrea]
- STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares
- 2 SC endorsements [Scouting, Ebsotz]Wirbanskia - for promotion of seat of Magnesia (REJECTED)
- 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
- 1 SC objections [New Korrea]
- STATUS: The WA Presidency has no authority to promote a secondary seat.
- 1 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia]Chackle - for a seat of Atlantis (REJECTED)
- STATUS: Non-determination of level of seat desired either primary or secondary
- STATUS: Not eligible due to Sections 3 and 5 of the WASC Qualifications Act
Thank you.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.
I will support you!!
DPRNK- Regional Power
- Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Republic of New Korrea wrote:Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.
I will support you!!
Thanks, that's kind of you, but I believe we should both put our effort to get ISIS's future seat.
Last edited by Trinity_Sector on Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Typo)
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Trinity_Sector wrote:Republic of New Korrea wrote:Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.
I will support you!!
Thanks kind of you, but I believe we should both put our effort to get ISIS's future seat.
Yeah you need a lot of support From WASC.
DPRNK- Regional Power
- Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I would like to run for the secondary seat in Mnemosyne?
Aetopolis- Sovereign State
- Posts : 6
Join date : 2015-03-22
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.
Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6
.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.
Also this.
With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.
Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
3-2-1(Y-A-N)
3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5
.5=50%
Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6
.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.
Also this.
With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.
Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
3-2-1(Y-A-N)
3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5
.5=50%
Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
The Holy Empire of Artite- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Can you direct this to its respected topic? i'm sure if you TG Eurssia he can explain it through to you.The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.
Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6
.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.
Also this.
With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.
Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
3-2-1(Y-A-N)
3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5
.5=50%
Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I would not like to see any of you guys warned so please all non-WASC members revert from posting in SC threads, you are only permitted to post here> https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t723-wasc-global-discussions
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.
Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6
.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.
Also this.
With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.
Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.
3-2-1(Y-A-N)
3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5
.5=50%
Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
Well, all this time this has been the voting thing that the WASC is using. Why make an issue out of it just now? Why just now? With so many laws and proposals that has passed why now? This is because you are all afraid to face the guilty verdict! And all what you are doing are politically motivate just to stop the cases that is now moving forward against you all!
DPRNK- Regional Power
- Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I don't mean to say anything harm against any country but raising this issue seems to be a politically motivated one because I don't see any problem on the voting system and it has been there for so long. And no one has raised a fuss about it except about these lawsuits? I guess we should just face the lawsuits and end all this for the sake of stopping New Korrea.
Muchos Estados Unidos- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Wirbanskia wrote:I would not like to see any of you guys warned so please all non-WASC members revert from posting in SC threads, you are only permitted to post here> https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t723-wasc-global-discussions
Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Trinity, being a non-WASC member means you cannot post here unless your trying to claim a seat or you're involved in a case, other then those you can only post in the link I provided for you if it concerns WASC matters......Trinity_Sector wrote:
Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Wirbanskia wrote:Trinity, being a non-WASC member means you cannot post here unless your trying to claim a seat or you're involved in a case, other then those you can only post in the link I provided for you if it concerns WASC matters......Trinity_Sector wrote:
Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
i am currently on the roster for secondary if you checked Eurussia's post. Glad you finally cared after you got the big new job.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
If you noticed before as well, I started caring long before I got the "big new job".....
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
NOTICE
I.S.I.S wrote:Please decide on my seat so I know what is my fate with my seat in WASC. Thank you!
The WA Presidency will make the necessary ruling as requested.
NOTICE
Great Eurussia wrote:I.S.I.S wrote:Please decide on my seat so I know what is my fate with my seat in WASC. Thank you!
The WA Presidency will make the necessary ruling as requested.
NOTICE
Great Eurussia wrote:VACANT SEATS at the SECURITY COUNCIL
- ASIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- IBERIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- ARCADIA -
- ATLANTIS - primary seat, secondary seat
- OCEANIA - primary seat, secondary seat
- OLYMPIA - secondary seat
- ANATOLIA - secondary seat
- ERYTHRAEA - primary seat, secondary seat
- MAGNESIA -
- POLYNESIA - secondary seat
- PHOENICIA -
- MICRONESIA - secondary seat
- MNEMOSYNE - secondary seat
RULING
ISIS - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (GRANTED!)
Apepistan - for secondary seat of Arcadia (GRANTED!)
- 2 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, Scouting]Xolox - for primary seat of Oceania (under evaluation)
- 1 SC objections [New Korrea]
- STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares
- 1 SC endorsements [Ebsotz]Aetopolis - for secondary seat of Mnemosyne (under evaluation)
- STATUS: New application
- 2 SC endorsements [New Korrea, Ebsotz]Trinity Sector - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (WITHDRAWN)
- STATUS: Voluntary withdrawal
- 4 SC endorsements [MEU, Ebsotz, Wirbanskia, Russia]Artite - for secondary seat of Arcadia (REJECTED)
- 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
- 1 SC objections [New Korrea]
- STATUS: Ineligible under the WA Security Council Qualifications Act
Thank you.
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Congratulations to all new nations of Security Council!
Kingdom of Scottlands- Emerging Regional Power
- Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I would like primary seat in atlantis.
Juvor- Recognized State
- Posts : 35
Join date : 2015-02-02
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
I endorse Chackle's bid for primary seat.Chackle wrote:I would like primary seat in atlantis.
Shockwave- Potential World Power
- Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
Chackle wrote:I would like primary seat in atlantis.
Apepistan endorses Chackle aswell.
Apepistan- Regional Power
- Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary
Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL
The United Kingdoms of Apepistan endorse Aetopolis aswell.UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Scouting endorses Aetopolis for a secondary seat.
Apepistan- Regional Power
- Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary
Page 9 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» (Former) Third Security Council
» (Former) Fourth Security Council
» (Former) Fifth Security Council
» (Former) First Security Council
» (Former) Second Security Council
» (Former) Fourth Security Council
» (Former) Fifth Security Council
» (Former) First Security Council
» (Former) Second Security Council
Page 9 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum