Re: (Resolved) China China vs Xolox

Muchos Estados Unidos Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:32 pm

Abstain for now because of peace talks in Washington

Great Eurussia Sat Sep 13, 2014 10:48 pm

China China wrote:China China vs Xolox

The People's Republic of China China requests Great EUrussia to remove Xolox to Zecurity Council because they declare war on us when we do not attack them.

This shall be known as 'China China vs Xolox'

Please note that this matter will be handled by the Tenth Security Council under its JUDICIAL AUTHORITY. Thus, at this stage, only the People's Republic of China China and the Grand Empire of Xolox may get involved in this issue.

I will inform the council if it's time to vote for verdict.

Great Eurussia Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:03 pm

The SC, under its judicial authority, hereby asks the Grand Empire of Xolox to 'comment' on the complaint filed by the People's Republic of China China.

You have two (2) days to reply.

Xolox Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:08 am

I'm here. The war was declared in light of recent Chinese warmongering. Do I need to make a separate thread to propose that the Chinese government be forcibly removed from power and exiled from the region?

Xolox Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:29 am

China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:I'm here. The war was declared in light of recent Chinese warmongering. Do I need to make a separate thread to propose that the Chinese government be forcibly removed from power and exiled from the region?

China China never declare war to Xolox. Never. So yoi start the war.

I didn't claim that you started the war. I started the war so that people wouldn't see your liberal use of unpunished warfare as a precedent to be used as an excuse in the future.

Xolox Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:12 am

China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:
China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:I'm here. The war was declared in light of recent Chinese warmongering. Do I need to make a separate thread to propose that the Chinese government be forcibly removed from power and exiled from the region?

China China never declare war to Xolox. Never. So yoi start the war.

I didn't claim that you started the war. I started the war so that people wouldn't see your liberal use of unpunished warfare as a precedent to be used as an excuse in the future.

What unpunished warfare? The People's Republic of China china did not do wrong. And you say you started the war, you should be remove from Security Council because you are not for peace and you do not follow ceasefire.

The cease fire was a suggestion, not an order. I don't remember saying I'd be for peace when I joined the security council, so I don't see how that could be grounds for my dismissal.

Kingdom of Ireland Sun Sep 14, 2014 12:56 pm

China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:
China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:
China China wrote:
Xolox wrote:I'm here. The war was declared in light of recent Chinese warmongering. Do I need to make a separate thread to propose that the Chinese government be forcibly removed from power and exiled from the region?

China China never declare war to Xolox. Never. So yoi start the war.

I didn't claim that you started the war. I started the war so that people wouldn't see your liberal use of unpunished warfare as a precedent to be used as an excuse in the future.

What unpunished warfare? The People's Republic of China china did not do wrong. And you say you started the war, you should be remove from Security Council because you are not for peace and you do not follow ceasefire.

The cease fire was a suggestion, not an order. I don't remember saying I'd be for peace when I joined the security council, so I don't see how that could be grounds for my dismissal.

Yeah but you join Security Council you commit to peace because Security Council is not for war. Correct Great EUrussia? And the ceasefire is agreement of nation states in Washington DC, your dog Emperor is part of it, why not follow agreement for peace?

Ok here is where i intervene. I am not a member of the Security Council though I have applied. First off. The Ceasefire was a suggestion by Eurussia. The Peace Summit didn't adopt it. And even if they did they cant force nations to accept it. Xolox never accepted the ceasefire so they were under no obligation to follow it. Case closed. End of story.

Great Eurussia Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:42 pm

Spoiler:

The SC, under its judicial powers, warns the Republic of Georgia not to intervene on the on-going case as the council has a standing order for non-interruption of non-parties to the pending case. Thus, the Republic of Georgia is 'ordered' not to intervene again. Thank you.

Great Eurussia Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:47 pm

The SC, through its judicial powers, have come up with a 'conclusion' following the exchange of arguments between the two parties involved. Thus, the People's Republic of China China and the Grand Empire of Xolox are asked if they have any further arguments or evidences to be presented. If there is none, after one (1) day, the SC will publish its 'conclusion' and 'recommendation' for a verdict which will put on public vote.

So ordered.

Great Eurussia Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:10 pm

The SC is pleased to announce the following:

Conclusion: The Grand Empire of Xolox, supported by its own admission, have willingly started the war against the People's Republic of China China. This is beside the fact that the latter has caused provocations that 'might' have promoted the Grand Empire of Xolox to declare a war. Nonetheless, the Grand Empire of Xolox, knows very well its primary duty under the 'Constitutional Nullification Declaration' that as member state of the Security Council, it will lead the world in maintaining peace, security, and stability. Thus, its declaration of war, being not recognized as a right of a state opposite to the right to self defense of nations recognized by law, violed the oath to the SC.

Recommendation: The People's Republic of China China's petition to remove the Grand Empire of Xolox from the Security Council has been found reasonable and based on facts as per the Conclusion aforementioned above. Thus, it is now upon the decision of the Security Council, acting under its judicial authority of the world, to remove the Grand Empire of Xolox from the Security Council.

A public vote is hereby called to order.

Great Eurussia Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:11 pm

Eurussia abstains.

Snarfian Federation Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:19 pm

Snarfia doesn't what xolox to be removed from the security council, but if it happens that xolox will be removed Snarfia calls for eviction of China China too

Muchos Estados Unidos Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:49 pm

Because we are against war, we in favor.

Xolox Tue Sep 16, 2014 1:31 am

Now, if I understand this correctly, the SC can't achieve 75% majority without the support of Snarfia and Eurussia ( and my own if we include the involved parties).

Zanland Tue Sep 16, 2014 3:12 am

We are against removing Xolox from the security council.

Serenarea Tue Sep 16, 2014 9:01 am

Serenarea is AGAINST removing the nation of Xolox from the Security Council.

Great Eurussia Tue Sep 16, 2014 12:29 pm

So far there are two (2) votes in favor and three (3) votes against and one (1) abstention. There are still need three (3) pending votes.

Great Eurussia Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:47 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
So far there are two (2) votes in favor and three (3) votes against and one (1) abstention. There are still need three (3) pending votes.

The voting for verdict will be closed in one (1) day. Thus, all pending votes will be considered as abstentions.

Great Eurussia Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:34 am

With 2 votes in favor and 3 votes against and 4 abstentions, the recommended verdict failed to reach the 6 required approval votes to enforce the verdict.

Hence, the case is hereby resolved.

Sponsored content

(Resolved) China China vs Xolox