(Dismissed) WASC Removal Act

• Insufficient Activity: The nation is active enough to avoid outright removal via the WA Accountability Act, but is inactive enough to not understand the on-going conflicts and proposed legislation. Should a member nation of the WASC be able to prove that said nation is Insufficiently Active, this may be a route for removal.
  
• Violation(s) of WASC passed Legislation: Although certain laws may already have standards for punishment of nations who are in violation of a law, WASC members should be held to a higher standard. If a WASC member is found to be in violation of a passed law, then another WASC member may petition for the nation's removal, regardless of the law's suggested punishment. WASC members are expected to set an example and uphold the laws of the World Alliance.
  
• Unnecessary Aggression: If a member nation of the WASC be found to actively pursuing a war without going to reasonable lengths to prevent said war through means of peace, other WASC members may petition for the member nation's removal, as World Alliance is built off of peace and we attempt to keep the peace within the region. Before petitioning for removal, the member nation should be asked to once more, attempt to resolve the situation peacefully or hold a peace conference.
  
• General Misconduct: If a member nation of the WASC is found to be in conduct unbecoming of a WASC member, which is defined as;
  
  
  
  1. That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and
     
  2. That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming a WASC member.
     
  
  In order for this petition to be put to vote, the President must approval all petitions for "General Misconduct"
  

New Rhodinia wrote:Color me confused but I don't see any examples of what defines "general misconduct". If there isn't already, I would say "general misconduct" can include vehement verbal abuse of fellow WA members, acting only in pursuit of benefit for the misconduct I've state and no other WA member, and/or failing to participate in organizations of which the state is a major part of (i.e my council seat in the WEPA).

New Rhodinia wrote:Still, wouldn't other nations have to look at a removal proposal? Just the President's decision outside of a general WASC concensus seems a bit odd.

New Rhodinia wrote:Ah, my apologies then. Other then that little bit, it looks good from my point of view.

New Rhodinia wrote:That was my "general misconduct" question: giving examples. Unless that part wasn't meant to have specific definitions, then it's fine with me.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Since it's clear that we need guidelines to remove nations from the WASC, I am proposing that these set of guidelines be placed into law:

When a nations deems it necessary to petition for a member of the WASC to be removed from office, he/she may go about doing this for one or more of the following reasons:

• Insufficient Activity: The nation is active enough to avoid outright removal via the WA Accountability Act, but is inactive enough to not understand the on-going conflicts and proposed legislation. Should a member nation of the WASC be able to prove that said nation is Insufficiently Active, this may be a route for removal.
  
• Violation(s) of WASC passed Legislation: Although certain laws may already have standards for punishment of nations who are in violation of a law, WASC members should be held to a higher standard. If a WASC member is found to be in violation of a passed law, then another WASC member may petition for the nation's removal, regardless of the law's suggested punishment. WASC members are expected to set an example and uphold the laws of the World Alliance.
  
• Unnecessary Aggression: If a member nation of the WASC be found to actively pursuing a war without going to reasonable lengths to prevent said war through means of peace, other WASC members may petition for the member nation's removal, as World Alliance is built off of peace and we attempt to keep the peace within the region. Before petitioning for removal, the member nation should be asked to once more, attempt to resolve the situation peacefully or hold a peace conference.
  
• General Misconduct: If a member nation of the WASC is found to be in conduct unbecoming of a WASC member, which is defined as;
  
  
  
  1. That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and
     
  2. That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming a WASC member.
     
  
  In order for this petition to be put to vote, the President must approval all petitions for "General Misconduct"
  

This will allow WASC members to be able to lawfully remove a member nation of the WASC from their seat. I think with all of the fighting that has been going about lately, it's been long needed.

Please feel free to expand upon suggested reasons to petition for a WASC member's removal.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:I like the first half minus the combination with the accountability act.

Great Eurussia wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:I like the first half minus the combination with the accountability act.

First half minus combination?

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Great Eurussia wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:I like the first half minus the combination with the accountability act.

First half minus combination?

Keeping the accountability act separate.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Since it's clear that we need guidelines to remove nations from the WASC, I am proposing that these set of guidelines be placed into law:

When a nations deems it necessary to petition for a member of the WASC to be removed from office, he/she may go about doing this for one or more of the following reasons:

• Insufficient Activity: The nation is active enough to avoid outright removal via the WA Accountability Act, but is inactive enough to not understand the on-going conflicts and proposed legislation. Should a member nation of the WASC be able to prove that said nation is Insufficiently Active, this may be a route for removal.
  
• Violation(s) of WASC passed Legislation: Although certain laws may already have standards for punishment of nations who are in violation of a law, WASC members should be held to a higher standard. If a WASC member is found to be in violation of a passed law, then another WASC member may petition for the nation's removal, regardless of the law's suggested punishment. WASC members are expected to set an example and uphold the laws of the World Alliance.
  
• Unnecessary Aggression: If a member nation of the WASC be found to actively pursuing a war without going to reasonable lengths to prevent said war through means of peace, other WASC members may petition for the member nation's removal, as World Alliance is built off of peace and we attempt to keep the peace within the region. Before petitioning for removal, the member nation should be asked to once more, attempt to resolve the situation peacefully or hold a peace conference.
  
• General Misconduct: If a member nation of the WASC is found to be in conduct unbecoming of a WASC member, which is defined as;
  
  
  
  1. That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and
     
  2. That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming a WASC member.
     
  
  In order for this petition to be put to vote, the President must approval all petitions for "General Misconduct"
  

This will allow WASC members to be able to lawfully remove a member nation of the WASC from their seat. I think with all of the fighting that has been going about lately, it's been long needed.

Please feel free to expand upon suggested reasons to petition for a WASC member's removal.

* Pending - (14) - Eurussia, Scottlands, China China, Chivalry, Scouting, Articmainia, DPRK, Zanland, Xolox, New Rhodinia, Ebsotz, Serenarea, Snarfia, MEU

           

* Yes - (0) - 

* No - (0) - 

* Abstain - (0) - 


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Eurussia abstains. We wish this proposal to be included on the WA Accountability Act and as well as include our two proposed provisions for strengthened accountability.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Since it's clear that we need guidelines to remove nations from the WASC, I am proposing that these set of guidelines be placed into law:

When a nations deems it necessary to petition for a member of the WASC to be removed from office, he/she may go about doing this for one or more of the following reasons:

• Insufficient Activity: The nation is active enough to avoid outright removal via the WA Accountability Act, but is inactive enough to not understand the on-going conflicts and proposed legislation. Should a member nation of the WASC be able to prove that said nation is Insufficiently Active, this may be a route for removal.
  
• Violation(s) of WASC passed Legislation: Although certain laws may already have standards for punishment of nations who are in violation of a law, WASC members should be held to a higher standard. If a WASC member is found to be in violation of a passed law, then another WASC member may petition for the nation's removal, regardless of the law's suggested punishment. WASC members are expected to set an example and uphold the laws of the World Alliance.
  
• Unnecessary Aggression: If a member nation of the WASC be found to actively pursuing a war without going to reasonable lengths to prevent said war through means of peace, other WASC members may petition for the member nation's removal, as World Alliance is built off of peace and we attempt to keep the peace within the region. Before petitioning for removal, the member nation should be asked to once more, attempt to resolve the situation peacefully or hold a peace conference.
  
• General Misconduct: If a member nation of the WASC is found to be in conduct unbecoming of a WASC member, which is defined as;
  
  
  
  1. That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and
     
  2. That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming a WASC member.
     
  
  In order for this petition to be put to vote, the President must approval all petitions for "General Misconduct"
  

This will allow WASC members to be able to lawfully remove a member nation of the WASC from their seat. I think with all of the fighting that has been going about lately, it's been long needed.

Please feel free to expand upon suggested reasons to petition for a WASC member's removal.

* Yes - (1) - MEU

* No - (1) - DPRK

* Abstain - (12) - Eurussia, Scottlands, China China, Chivalry, Scouting, Articmainia,  Zanland, Xolox, New Rhodinia, Ebsotz, Serenarea, Snarfia


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.