(Dismissed) Request to Dismiss Scottlands

With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

As Author, we are in Favor.

I understand that Scottlands is trying to keep up with its neutral status quo here, but there's always a time when you have to make a solid, reasonable decision. The majority of votes that they've made only consist of a single vote and unfortunately, recent votes don't fill the holes either. Instead of one option, it's two: "Seeing the good intentions" and a favor vote or a simple abstain.

It feels harsh to say it, but I'm in favor.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

Can I know more about these because I cannot decide what vote should I make.

Republic of New Korrea wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

Can I know more about these because I cannot decide what vote should I make.

Here are Scottlands recent votes:

Amend WA Accountability Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain

WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain.

WASC Secondary Seats Act

Scottish Republic wrote:The Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

WA Resolution Voting Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is abstaining.

Amend WA Accountability Act (First Version)

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain. I'm undecided though

The majority of Scottish Republic's, Scottlands, votes are abstentions, or favors because of the "good intentions of the proposal". This is damaging to the legislation as every abstention currently counts against the final tally, which harms the capabilities of the WASC to be able to carry out their duty of making legislature. Even though Scottlands intends to be neutral to all issues, he's really harming the process here. If you cannot make decisions, you shouldn't be in a governing body.

What I am saying right now is going to be harsh to myself. But we are sad to say that I am in favor.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Republic of New Korrea wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

Can I know more about these because I cannot decide what vote should I make.

Here are Scottlands recent votes:

Amend WA Accountability Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain

WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain.

WASC Secondary Seats Act

Scottish Republic wrote:The Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

WA Resolution Voting Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is abstaining.

Amend WA Accountability Act (First Version)

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain. I'm undecided though

The majority of Scottish Republic's, Scottlands, votes are abstentions, or favors because of the "good intentions of the proposal". This is damaging to the legislation as every abstention currently counts against the final tally, which harms the capabilities of the WASC to be able to carry out their duty of making legislature. Even though Scottlands intends to be neutral to all issues, he's really harming the process here. If you cannot make decisions, you shouldn't be in a governing body.

Why remove the Scottish Republic just because of our votes? Why not remove those nations that are not voting all the time? Why Scouting is targetting Scottlands just because we blew the whistle on its plans to dominate the Security Council? Why not be contented you got the Vice Presideny and now try to eject not aligned with you? Do not justify and use as a pretext our abstentions to get us removed. All members have the right to vote as they please and we have our reasons.


I suggest you pass a law banning abstentions rather than making reform excuses to justify kicking out members not supportive of you!

Scottish Republic wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Republic of New Korrea wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

Can I know more about these because I cannot decide what vote should I make.

Here are Scottlands recent votes:

Amend WA Accountability Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain

WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain.

WASC Secondary Seats Act

Scottish Republic wrote:The Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

WA Resolution Voting Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is abstaining.

Amend WA Accountability Act (First Version)

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain. I'm undecided though

The majority of Scottish Republic's, Scottlands, votes are abstentions, or favors because of the "good intentions of the proposal". This is damaging to the legislation as every abstention currently counts against the final tally, which harms the capabilities of the WASC to be able to carry out their duty of making legislature. Even though Scottlands intends to be neutral to all issues, he's really harming the process here. If you cannot make decisions, you shouldn't be in a governing body.

Why remove the Scottish Republic just because of our votes? Why not remove those nations that are not voting all the time? Why Scouting is targetting Scottlands just because we blew the whistle on its plans to dominate the Security Council? Why not be contented you got the Vice Presideny and now try to eject not aligned with you? Do not justify and use as a pretext our abstentions to get us removed. All members have the right to vote as they please and we have our reasons.


I suggest you pass a law banning abstentions rather than making reform excuses to justify kicking out members not supportive of you!

Well if we proposed a law banning abstentions you would just abstain. That's all you do.

We tried to dismiss the members that don't vote. But wait what did you do? Abstain.

With that said we are in favor.

Scottish Republic wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

Republic of New Korrea wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With clear admittance to being devoted to being neutral in all matters, the Scottish Republic, or Scottlands, is harming the legislative process of the WA's Governing Body, the World Alliance Security Council. I've received multiple complaints from members of the WA and I feel it's time to take action. As such, I feel it necessary to remove Scottlands from the WASC with the help of fellow WASC members, citing Section 2 of the "World Alliance Security Council Act".

This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.

Can I know more about these because I cannot decide what vote should I make.

Here are Scottlands recent votes:

Amend WA Accountability Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain

WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

Compulsory Arbitration of Xolox

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain.

WASC Secondary Seats Act

Scottish Republic wrote:The Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.

WA Resolution Voting Act

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic is abstaining.

Amend WA Accountability Act (First Version)

Scottish Republic wrote:Abstain. I'm undecided though

The majority of Scottish Republic's, Scottlands, votes are abstentions, or favors because of the "good intentions of the proposal". This is damaging to the legislation as every abstention currently counts against the final tally, which harms the capabilities of the WASC to be able to carry out their duty of making legislature. Even though Scottlands intends to be neutral to all issues, he's really harming the process here. If you cannot make decisions, you shouldn't be in a governing body.

Why remove the Scottish Republic just because of our votes? Why not remove those nations that are not voting all the time? Why Scouting is targetting Scottlands just because we blew the whistle on its plans to dominate the Security Council? Why not be contented you got the Vice Presideny and now try to eject not aligned with you? Do not justify and use as a pretext our abstentions to get us removed. All members have the right to vote as they please and we have our reasons.


I suggest you pass a law banning abstentions rather than making reform excuses to justify kicking out members not supportive of you!

Eurussia raises the following points:

I abstain

Eurussian is absolutely correct. Why blame countries because proposals failed? That is wrong. So I am against.

against

Serenarea is completely AGAINST this proposal.

Thank you everyone. We should learn to stand up for our interests. This is just too much. Most of the proposals here in this council is more on removing nations rather than worthy ones! Since Scouting ever got his seat on the WASC he started his quest to removing members against him and using all sorts of excuses. This should stop.

Scottish Republic wrote:Thank you everyone. We should learn to stand up for our interests. This is just too much. Most of the proposals here in this council is more on removing nations rather than worthy ones! Since Scouting ever got his seat on the WASC he started his quest to removing members against him and using all sorts of excuses. This should stop.

Scouting commends your quest to standing up for what you and your people, as well as your constituents agree on. We're happy to drop the resolution against you, should you start taking WASC matters seriously.

Therefore, this resolution is hereby, Dismissed.