Re: (Resolved) Xolox vs WASC Presidency

DPRNK Fri Feb 06, 2015 8:58 pm

Xolox deserves it

Xolox Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:48 pm

Republic of New Korrea wrote:Xolox deserves it

Deserves what? There is no punishment as a result of this case...

Kingdom of Ireland Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:37 am

Can y'all please just stick with either for the recommendation or against the recommendation?

DPRNK Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:53 am

Empire of Russia wrote:Can y'all please just stick with either for the recommendation or against the recommendation?

I apologize. Favor

Zanland Sat Feb 07, 2015 10:00 am

Zanland is in favor of Xolox

UnitedStatesOfScouting Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:07 pm

Favor

Serenarea Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:35 pm

Favor

Muchos Estados Unidos Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:04 pm

Xolox Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:10 pm

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:FOR

You already voted on this.

Muchos Estados Unidos Sat Feb 07, 2015 1:18 pm

Xolox wrote:
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:FOR
You already voted on this.

Just want to emphasize more.

Snarfian Federation Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:10 pm

Abstain

Kingdom of Scottlands Sun Feb 08, 2015 9:32 am

Favor

New Rhodinia Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:42 am

This one is a bit different. Instead of just saying favor or against, state which side you align yourself with: Xolox or the Presidency.

Great Eurussia Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:25 pm

New Rhodinia wrote:This one is a bit different. Instead of just saying favor or against, state which side you align yourself with: Xolox or the Presidency.

In our opinion, this is absolutely wrong. The verdict is the one being voted upon and not choosing which side is which. This is an international court case.

Xolox Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:26 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Rhodinia wrote:This one is a bit different. Instead of just saying favor or against, state which side you align yourself with: Xolox or the Presidency.

In our opinion, this is absolutely wrong. The verdict is the one being voted upon and not choosing which side is which. This is an international court case.

Yeah, I know, but the two who voted against wrote their vote in favor so I think he wants to be sure that they're voting in favor of the verdict.

Great Eurussia Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:46 pm

Eurussia advices the presiding judge to make a time limit for this case so as to properly close the case. And since under usual cases, after the verdict five days are given to the Security Council to vote. And since three days has passed, we suggest to end the voting in 2 days .

Thank you.

Kingdom of Ireland Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:52 pm

We shall grant the wish of the Presidency. Voting shall last for three(3) days

UnitedStatesOfScouting Mon Feb 09, 2015 4:51 am

Empire of Russia wrote:We shall grant the wish of the Presidency. Voting shall last for three(3) days

Ends IN three days or lasts for 3 days? In typical cases total time is about 5 days.

Kingdom of Ireland Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:58 am

Empire of Russia wrote:We shall grant the wish of the Presidency. Voting shall last for three(3) days

3 days have passed I will count the votes and issue if the verdict has passed or not.

Kingdom of Ireland Fri Feb 13, 2015 5:09 am

With 6 votes in favor the Security Council rules in favor of the Presidency. The verdict is upheld with an enforceable recommendation.

Great Eurussia Fri Feb 13, 2015 1:37 pm

Empire of Russia wrote:With 6 votes in favor the Security Council rules in favor of the Presidency. The verdict is upheld with an enforceable recommendation.

Noted.

Sponsored content