(Dismissed) Declaring the Headquarters of WASC an International Territory

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

Shockwave wrote:Against. I would like to see to it that the WASC head-quarters lie within an uncontrolled, nuetral, and non-surrounded area.

Regardless of the nation, I would still call for a move as internal government workings and relations are not perfect within any nation and avoiding civil war, protests, and economic depression is nearly impossible in this day and age.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

Please cite where this notation of the current WASC grounds has been declared as international territory is at.

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

Please cite where this notation of the current WASC grounds has been declared as international territory is at.

under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

Please cite where this notation of the current WASC grounds has been declared as international territory is at.

under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia.

This does not explicitly declare the WASC grounds as international territory. This explains the rights of countries who visit the WASC Headquarters.

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

Please cite where this notation of the current WASC grounds has been declared as international territory is at.

under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia.

This does not explicitly declare the WASC grounds as international territory. This explains the rights of countries who visit the WASC Headquarters.

How does this differs with embassies and consulates which are not covered by laws of the host country? They have extraterritoriality and immunity.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The WASC does not have the capability to declare a nation's sovereign land as international territory, to do so would be a formal declaration of war. This proposal is dependant on the approval of Great Eurussia to allow his nation's territory be declared international.

Nevertheless, this proposal is open for debate for three days.

We have the capability of WASC wants it. Besides, do not overreact as we are not declaring war on Eurussia. If we can pass a law just like the Regional Human Rights Act that stops nations to pass laws against their citizens, then why not just a simple declaration?

The difference is with the Human Rights Act is that you're imposing a regulation. With this declaration you're taking sovereign land from a country without their permission (at this point).

If this is your concern, I would have to add this statement into the proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

The statement addresses the concerns of Scottlands, but does not declare the territory as international. As of this moment it's still within Eurussian sovereign territory.

This shows that Eurussia already declared the land of the headquarters as international territory with immunity from Eurussian laws. WASC just need to supplement it, problem solved. No taxpayers money wasted.

Please cite where this notation of the current WASC grounds has been declared as international territory is at.

under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia.

This does not explicitly declare the WASC grounds as international territory. This explains the rights of countries who visit the WASC Headquarters.

How does this differs with embassies and consulates which are not covered by laws of the host country? They have extraterritoriality and immunity.

Extraterritoriality is the state of being exempted from the jurisdiction of local law, usually as the result of diplomatic negotiations.

An international zone is a type of extraterritoriality governed by international law, or similar treaty between two or more nations.

Both are very similar however the difference is extraterritoriality still allows ownership to be claimed by the lever of the land thus is not international territory.

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC. And with this statement issued by Eurussia government during the discussions of moving the headquarters out of Eurussia, I believe they will support our proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

Great Eurussia wrote:

I.S.I.S wrote:Because of the confusion and division in WASC made by proposal of Scouting to move away from Moscow, Eurussia the headquarters of the Security Council for no reason, to show that ISIS is committed to contribute to the region, I move to declare the headquarters of the WASC in Moscow, Eurussia an international territory.

Also, I hope that Eurussia will take this as a privilege and not a stepping on to its sovereignty since I am aware he is very sensitive to that. Also, to be fair to all residents of the region in all continents, I also put into writing that all neutral territories officially have each continental headquarters of the WASC. And with this statement issued by Eurussia government during the discussions of moving the headquarters out of Eurussia, I believe they will support our proposal.

Great Eurussia wrote:

Proposal 3 - Eurussia believes that such proposal is really unnecessary as it has been the case ever since. Eurussia, as the Founder, has been consistently honored and recognized by the international community as the most neutral country in the world aside from the fact of being the founding nation of the World Alliance. Eurussia has donated the buildings where various central international institutions of the world occupied their offices including the present Security Council and under Eurussian laws, the entire sprawling complex and various offices of the Security Council in Moscow enjoys diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality thus allowing various diplomats and world leaders unrestricted access to the Security Council complex regardless of any nation's relations with Eurussia. We are proud to take into account that there was not even a single incident of diplomatic restriction against any individual of any foreign country that is a member state of the World Alliance throughout history even if a fellow member state is at the brink of war with Eurussia as we always stand and believe in the power of diplomacy.

I hope for the passage of our proposal which I think is fair for all.

The Eurussian Government is concerned on the hasty movements of our fellow member states before the Security Council on the matter involving the headquarters of the Security Council. We believe that there is not enough discussion on the matter as several parties immediately brought up different and conflicting proposals showing the divisiveness of the matter. We have already made our position on this matter, HERE.

And since a proposal has been submitted to the floor, we believe that it is imperative we issue a new statement based on the proposal at hand. We are deeply concerned that despite having no compelling reason to change the seat of the Security Council, the matter has become a political issue for some of our fellow member states which should have achieved a common consensus from all, if not, at the very least, most members of the international community and not just a simple majority. Henceforth, having made it clear that Eurussia is neither for nor against the change of location of the Security Council, our government is compelled to make a dignified position on this sensitive matter.

Hence, Eurussia urges our fellow member states to achieve a common consensus first so there will be at least a united front within the Security Council, on the matter at hand. And furthermore, on the basis of the proposal at hand, Eurussia concurs that since time immemorial that the Security Council has been hosted in our country, it has been legally designated as a de facto international territory under Eurussian laws due to its status in international relations, way above the status granted to diplomatic missions such as embassies and consulates. Nevertheless, Eurussia votes in favor.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:As I feel moving the headquarters to neutral territory is the best option, I am against this proposal.

Spoiler:

Great Eurussia wrote:

Spoiler:

With utmost respect to the Islamic States Government, Eurussia withdraws its vote on the proposal at hand. This comes after our issuance of consent and approval on the revisions on the currently deliberated executive resolution on the determination of the new location for the new seat of the headquarters of the Security Council.

Here.

Our position on the matter shall be considered as change of concurrence on the question of support and consent of our government on granting effect to an international declaration designating the grounds of the current Security Council as an international territory.

Therefore, Eurussia abstains.