Eurussian Position

Great Eurussia Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:13 pm

New Tarajan wrote:Due to the military intervention of Eurussia, it is opinion of the government of New Tarajan that the situation in Texania is going out of control.
For this reason, we are officially asking for a WAAF intervention in the country for a peace-enforcing mission.

Eurussia rejects this unfounded statements from New Tarajan. Our government only intervened directly when the WAPF Mission deliberately failed and needed the full support of our allies such as Aloia, Antanares, Eurasia, Articmainia, Newellia, Farshonia, and New Zealand whose armed forces are already in Texania. Furthermore, as we have analyze the situation on the ground, the WAAF, sad to say, can never change the status quo in the Texanian Civil War now that the situation is nearing its end as the conflict is between the two sides already. In addition to this, our government sees this as a waste of resources.

Eurussia believes that WAHO Intervention is the most needed assistance as of this moment and continued non-sense debates like this is already a waste of time that should have been spent on providing aid to the innocent Texanians. But to give the WAAF the benefit of the doubt, our government will listen on how it plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this aim?

Nevertheless, Eurussia is rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.

New Tarajan Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:43 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:Due to the military intervention of Eurussia, it is opinion of the government of New Tarajan that the situation in Texania is going out of control.
For this reason, we are officially asking for a WAAF intervention in the country for a peace-enforcing mission.
Eurussia rejects this unfounded statements from New Tarajan. Our government only intervened directly when the WAPF Mission deliberately failed and needed the full support of our allies such as Aloia, Antanares, Eurasia, Articmainia, Newellia, Farshonia, and New Zealand whose armed forces are already in Texania. Furthermore, as we have analyze the situation on the ground, the WAAF, sad to say, can never change the status quo in the Texanian Civil War now that the situation is nearing its end as the conflict is between the two sides already. In addition to this, our government sees this as a waste of resources.
Eurussia believes that WAHO Intervention is the most needed assistance as of this moment and continued non-sense debates like this is already a waste of time that should have been spent on providing aid to the innocent Texanians. But to give the WAAF the benefit of the doubt, our government will listen on how it plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this aim?
Nevertheless, Eurussia is rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.

Eurussia has no authority to decide for the WAAF. We will wait for an official response from Europe.
Also, we wish to reiterate that the only forces Antanares deployed in Texania were two teams to defend its own humanitarian mission. Furthermore, Aloia has no decided about a military intervention; Eurasia only sent police forces.
The continuous statements of the Eurussian government about a supposed alliance of many States are consequently unfounded.

Great Eurussia Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:54 pm

New Tarajan wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:Due to the military intervention of Eurussia, it is opinion of the government of New Tarajan that the situation in Texania is going out of control.
For this reason, we are officially asking for a WAAF intervention in the country for a peace-enforcing mission.
Eurussia rejects this unfounded statements from New Tarajan. Our government only intervened directly when the WAPF Mission deliberately failed and needed the full support of our allies such as Aloia, Antanares, Eurasia, Articmainia, Newellia, Farshonia, and New Zealand whose armed forces are already in Texania. Furthermore, as we have analyze the situation on the ground, the WAAF, sad to say, can never change the status quo in the Texanian Civil War now that the situation is nearing its end as the conflict is between the two sides already. In addition to this, our government sees this as a waste of resources.
Eurussia believes that WAHO Intervention is the most needed assistance as of this moment and continued non-sense debates like this is already a waste of time that should have been spent on providing aid to the innocent Texanians. But to give the WAAF the benefit of the doubt, our government will listen on how it plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this aim?
Nevertheless, Eurussia is rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.
Eurussia has no authority to decide for the WAAF. We will wait for an official response from Europe.
Also, we wish to reiterate that the only forces Antanares deployed in Texania were two teams to defend its own humanitarian mission. Furthermore, Aloia has no decided about a military intervention; Eurasia only sent police forces.
The continuous statements of the Eurussian government about a supposed alliance of many States are consequently unfounded.

Eurussia is a member of the WAAF and we have the right to opinion in all avenues. And we request the Tarajani Government to better answer our questions straight to the point rather than diverting the issues at hand. Our government clearly knows the position taken by all our allies including Antanares and Aloia and it is none of New Tarajan's business.

And going back to the issue at hand, our government asks, AGAIN, how does the WAAF plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this kind of late intervention aim? Now that it seems New Tarajan is blinded by the fact that armed forces from Newellia, Farshonia, Articmainia, and New Zealand is already on Texania and keeps on dragging its neighboring countries like Antanares and Aloia just to make sure it shows that its government is somewhat affected by the civil war.

Eurussia, still rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.

New Tarajan Fri Nov 29, 2013 6:06 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:Due to the military intervention of Eurussia, it is opinion of the government of New Tarajan that the situation in Texania is going out of control.
For this reason, we are officially asking for a WAAF intervention in the country for a peace-enforcing mission.
Eurussia rejects this unfounded statements from New Tarajan. Our government only intervened directly when the WAPF Mission deliberately failed and needed the full support of our allies such as Aloia, Antanares, Eurasia, Articmainia, Newellia, Farshonia, and New Zealand whose armed forces are already in Texania. Furthermore, as we have analyze the situation on the ground, the WAAF, sad to say, can never change the status quo in the Texanian Civil War now that the situation is nearing its end as the conflict is between the two sides already. In addition to this, our government sees this as a waste of resources.
Eurussia believes that WAHO Intervention is the most needed assistance as of this moment and continued non-sense debates like this is already a waste of time that should have been spent on providing aid to the innocent Texanians. But to give the WAAF the benefit of the doubt, our government will listen on how it plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this aim?
Nevertheless, Eurussia is rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.
Eurussia has no authority to decide for the WAAF. We will wait for an official response from Europe.
Also, we wish to reiterate that the only forces Antanares deployed in Texania were two teams to defend its own humanitarian mission. Furthermore, Aloia has no decided about a military intervention; Eurasia only sent police forces.
The continuous statements of the Eurussian government about a supposed alliance of many States are consequently unfounded.
Eurussia is a member of the WAAF and we have the right to opinion in all avenues. And we request the Tarajani Government to better answer our questions straight to the point rather than diverting the issues at hand. Our government clearly knows the position taken by all our allies including Antanares and Aloia and it is none of New Tarajan's business.
And going back to the issue at hand, our government asks, AGAIN, how does the WAAF plans to intervene very late on the unchangeable situation in the Texanian Civil War and what would this kind of late intervention aim? Now that it seems New Tarajan is blinded by the fact that armed forces from Newellia, Farshonia, Articmainia, and New Zealand is already on Texania and keeps on dragging its neighboring countries like Antanares and Aloia just to make sure it shows that its government is somewhat affected by the civil war.
Eurussia, still rejects a late response from the WAAF, for now.

We are not well-known for not answering questions.
Indeed, it is our intention to propose a plan where the WAAF should act as interposition force between the fighting factions, enforcing an effective ceasefire as basis for negotiations; the operation will include also a no-fly zone and an embargo against weapons dealing. But it will be Europe to decide.
Now, let me ask something to you: who decided the situation in Texania is unchangeable? Who backed the military operations which literally destroyed the possibilities for a success of the WAPF mission? Who gave the authorization to Eurussia to unilaterally decide which side has to be the successor of Texania?
The WAAF intervention will come exactly when it is needed: now. It is the job of this organization to resolve situations like this.
Now it is the time for Moscow to decide if to cooperate, or not.

Great Eurussia Fri Nov 29, 2013 6:40 pm

New Tarajan wrote:
We are not well-known for not answering questions.
Indeed, it is our intention to propose a plan where the WAAF should act as interposition force between the fighting factions, enforcing an effective ceasefire as basis for negotiations; the operation will include also a no-fly zone and an embargo against weapons dealing. But it will be Europe to decide.
Now, let me ask something to you: who decided the situation in Texania is unchangeable? Who backed the military operations which literally destroyed the possibilities for a success of the WAPF mission? Who gave the authorization to Eurussia to unilaterally decide which side has to be the successor of Texania?
The WAAF intervention will come exactly when it is needed: now. It is the job of this organization to resolve situations like this.
Now it is the time for Moscow to decide if to cooperate, or not.

Eurussia would first of all like to enlighten our colleague, New Tarajan, that even though Europe holds the Secretariat of the WAAF, it doesn't translate to absolute directorship of the entire organization as it is clearly provided in the WAAF Act which states,

"Section 1.2

The Defense Council is the body responsible for managing the organization in all its aspects and movement. It is the executive / legislative organization. It consists of one representative from each country that adheres to the organization, usually the representative is the Minister of Defence or the head of state of a nation. Each proposal submitted to the Council shall be passed as a resolution by a simple majority. Resolutions may include military action to be taken, political reform organization, budget proposals to be approved etc.."

Now, our government clearly believes that this vague proposal from New Tarajan is not reflecting the real and on-going situation on the Texanian Civil War. First, WAAF as an interposition force between fighting factions, how could the WAAF be realistically perform this duty on the Iguarrs vs Hovelars vs Ordus plus Eurussia versus Iguarrs versus Hovelars plus Farshonia vs Hovelars plus Articmainia vs Iguarrs plus Newellia vs Iguarrs plus New Zealand vs Iguarrs now Eurussia with Ordus, Farshonia, Articmainia, Newellia, New Zealand vs Iguarrs?

Second, WAAF ceasefire for negotiations, when Iguarrs vs Hovelars vs Ordus are not listening? Much more governments that are merely acting on self defense as enshrined in Section 2 of the Constitution. What if no rebels or nations listen? What will the WAAF do?

Third, WAAF declaration of no fly zone, for what when it is already imposed?

Fourth, WAAF ban against weapons dealing, is WAAF the WA Parliament now?

Eurussia believes that these proposals for WAAF Intervention lacks substance and as our government says is already too late to change the already unchangeable status quo in the Texanian Civil War. We fear that these proposals will only bring shame to the WAAF.

Hence, we are not convinced, therefore, Eurussia still rejects late WAAF Intervention.

New Tarajan Fri Nov 29, 2013 7:01 pm

Very well.
We acknowledge your position. But let us answer to your points.

1) It is supposed that the forces of all other countries will withdraw after the announcement of the WAAF intervention; we do not expect responsible actions from the rebels, but we have right to assume that from countries.

2) The Hovelars are not anymore a faction in this fame, since they surrendered. Also, the rebel movements have the choice if to listen or not. If not, it will be the duty of the WAAF to demonstrate the commitment of the World Alliance to proceed with ensuring peace in Texania.

3) We know there is already a no-fly zone: simply, it will pass under WAAF command, for a better coordination.

3) Of course not. But to stop any weapon trade in a war torn country is also a duty of the WAAF. If an intervention of the Parliament on this point will be necessary, then the government of New Tarajan will personally take it in front of the Parliament.

We are deeply sorry to see your negative and uncooperative attitude.
We hope Eurussia will change its mind.

Great Eurussia Fri Nov 29, 2013 8:58 pm

New Tarajan wrote:Very well.
We acknowledge your position. But let us answer to your points.

1) It is supposed that the forces of all other countries will withdraw after the announcement of the WAAF intervention; we do not expect responsible actions from the rebels, but we have right to assume that from countries.

2) The Hovelars are not anymore a faction in this fame, since they surrendered. Also, the rebel movements have the choice if to listen or not. If not, it will be the duty of the WAAF to demonstrate the commitment of the World Alliance to proceed with ensuring peace in Texania.

3) We know there is already a no-fly zone: simply, it will pass under WAAF command, for a better coordination.

3) Of course not. But to stop any weapon trade in a war torn country is also a duty of the WAAF. If an intervention of the Parliament on this point will be necessary, then the government of New Tarajan will personally take it in front of the Parliament.

We are deeply sorry to see your negative and uncooperative attitude.
We hope Eurussia will change its mind.

Eurussia counters all the arguments presented by New Tarajan as expected, none contains arguments that are convincing and well crafted plans, furthermore:

First, these double standard policy is unacceptable as governments intervened to control the warmongering rebel groups and then suddenly under this vague proposal, WAAF would force countries to stop their intervention and then leave the rebels alone? This is plainly unacceptable and will result to bloodshed.

Second, how will this commitment to peace be enforced by the WAAF in this very complex situation? This is the bottomline of this very late response from the WAAF and it seems that New Tarajan has no direct solution to this very obvious situation on the ground thus worsening its extremely vague proposal.

Third, nonetheless complicating a simple policy.

Fourth, our government never seen any provision of such in the WAAF Act and we definitely believe that New Tarajan has no experience to define what is the duty of the WAAF and which is not. Furthermore, such unstudied policy must be scrutinized in Parliament.

Nevertheless, our government advises New Tarajan not to further accuse Eurussia of being uncooperative as if we are it is, we wouldn't be wasting time examining a poorly prepared proposal from a country trying to swallow things more than it could take which we are even helping to avoid the WAAF to face humiliation.

Eurussia remains unconvinced, hence, we still reject.

New Tarajan Fri Nov 29, 2013 11:30 pm

We cordially invite the Eurussian delegate to keep calm, during this friendly conversation, and to not launch so many accuses against our government. We are here only to discuss about the best solution for a terrible conflict which is destroying a country and taking thousands and thousands of lives.

Now, I can answer to your points.
If you desire a more precise plan for the WAAF, then New Tarajan is glad to provide our estimeed colleague with such a plan.
In our intentions, the operation will be firstly divided in two sections: Peace-Enforcing and Peace Keeping.

Let us begin with the first section, which seems to be the major concern of the Eurussian government.
This phase will consist in the deployment of two different contingents: the first one, the true interposition force, will be deployed on the line demarcating the borders between the zones occupied by the Iguarrs and the Ordus and on the capital city of Austinia, and a connected piece of land toward the sea. The initial operations will mainly consist of Special Forces Operations, Search & Destroy and similar, supported by precise air strikes, thus ensuring the most safe and rapid deployment possible.
The second contingent will consist of a Rapid Strike Force, possibly composed by many Carrier Battle Groups and Amphibious Battle Groups, with the main goal to strike down major military facilities and command centers and outposts of both rebel group, and to practically help the deployment of the first contingent and to actively support its operations.
Differently from Snarfia, it would be useful, in our opinion, to proceed with no division between the single national forces. Obviously the theatre will be divided in different areas, but with no specific national responsibility.
The main goal of the first phase of the operation is to:

1)Create a safe border zone, avoiding further contacts and fights between the two main rebel groups;

2)Liberate the capital city of Austinia, with a direct link to the sea (in order to not limit the logistical possibilities);

3)Ensure a first step toward the disarmament of the rebel factions;

Before the deployment, the WAAF will issue a statement, to invite all the factions to agree to a ceasefire and to allow the peaceful deployment of WAAF forces. The response to this invitation will be a first basis on which the WAAF task force could operate upon (in few words: who accepts is an ally, who don't is an enemy).

The second phase: peace-keeping.
All the countries involved in the question will create an International Summit, where they will invite all the rebel factions, to discuss about the future of Texania and, particularly, about the disarmament of the rebel groups.
This will be a critical point, since the disarmament is the first step toward the transformation of the factions in politically-structured parties, a good step toward the implementation of a new government in the country.
While the WAAF forces will oversee the respect of the ceasefire, a WAHO mission will begin its operations, thus ensuring the recovery of the population, under WAAF protection.

This is for the military side. If it is the desire of our Eurussian colleague, we have also a political plan.

Great Eurussia Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:43 am

Eurussia advices New Tarajan to avoid unnecessary comments most especially unfounded accusations and just answer our queries straigh to the point. Now with regards to this so called peace plan, here are our government positions, in detail.

1) Demarcation line? Impossible.

2) Austinian zone to sea? Impossible.

3) Missile strikes on both rebel groups? Ridiculous.

4) Neutral border zone? Unimaginable.

5) Liberation of Austiana? For what?

6) Disarmament? Extremely impossible.

7) Ceasefire? Unimaginable.

8) Non-cooperation treated as enemy? Ridiculous.

9) International Summit? For what?

Obviously, our government have not seen any concrete and realistic approach under this plan just to get the WAAF to intervene in an already unchangeable civil war. Our government sees this as a ploy of an opportunistic state trying to enforce the impossible in the name of international prestige which is unacceptable.

Eurussia is now totally unconvinced of the blueprint of the proposed peace plan of the already late WAAF Intervention. Our government still rejects.

New Tarajan Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:51 am

It is obvious also that your government does not want any intervention at all. I am deeply sorry to see such a closeness from you.
It would be interesting to hear the reasons behind your rejection of every point of our plan.
You do not know the military details so, why do you believe so firmly in their impossibility?

If for Moscow everything is impossible, New Tarajan warmly suggests to Eurussia to retreat their forces, coming back home and relax, leaving who is willing to help to do their best.
Instead of striking missiles on Texania, which is...unuseful, due to your objections.

In the meanwhile, New Tarajan will continue to design a viable plan, well conscious of the difficulties of the issue, in the hope to do something concrete to help a country getting out from a civil war with no foreign power dictating who is worthy to stay in power there.

Guest Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:59 am

New Tarajan wrote:It is obvious also that your government does not want any intervention at all. I am deeply sorry to see such a closeness from you.
It would be interesting to hear the reasons behind your rejection of every point of our plan.
You do not know the military details so, why do you believe so firmly in their impossibility?

If for Moscow everything is impossible, New Tarajan warmly suggests to Eurussia to retreat their forces, coming back home and relax, leaving who is willing to help to do their best.
Instead of striking missiles on Texania, which is...unuseful, due to your objections.

In the meanwhile, New Tarajan will continue to design a viable plan, well conscious of the difficulties of the issue, in the hope to do something concrete to help a country getting out from a civil war with no foreign power dictating who is worthy to stay in power there.

I bet ye'r just tryin gettin' everyone off Texania so you can claim the darn area for yourself.

New Tarajan Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:01 am

Stirva wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:It is obvious also that your government does not want any intervention at all. I am deeply sorry to see such a closeness from you.
It would be interesting to hear the reasons behind your rejection of every point of our plan.
You do not know the military details so, why do you believe so firmly in their impossibility?

If for Moscow everything is impossible, New Tarajan warmly suggests to Eurussia to retreat their forces, coming back home and relax, leaving who is willing to help to do their best.
Instead of striking missiles on Texania, which is...unuseful, due to your objections.

In the meanwhile, New Tarajan will continue to design a viable plan, well conscious of the difficulties of the issue, in the hope to do something concrete to help a country getting out from a civil war with no foreign power dictating who is worthy to stay in power there.
I bet ye'r just gettin everyone off Texania so you can claim the darn area for yourself.

Please, do not be foolish. New Tarajan's only interest in Texania is to put an end to the civil war, and have the country recovering more fast possible. Nothing less, nothing more.
And I believe this is the goal of almost all the actors involved, including Eurussia, even if we have opposing views on how to solve the problem.
Someone can disregard our foreign policy, but nobody can say the Kingdom is such an imperialistic power.

Great Eurussia Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:30 pm

New Tarajan wrote:It is obvious also that your government does not want any intervention at all. I am deeply sorry to see such a closeness from you.
It would be interesting to hear the reasons behind your rejection of every point of our plan.
You do not know the military details so, why do you believe so firmly in their impossibility?

If for Moscow everything is impossible, New Tarajan warmly suggests to Eurussia to retreat their forces, coming back home and relax, leaving who is willing to help to do their best.
Instead of striking missiles on Texania, which is...unuseful, due to your objections.

In the meanwhile, New Tarajan will continue to design a viable plan, well conscious of the difficulties of the issue, in the hope to do something concrete to help a country getting out from a civil war with no foreign power dictating who is worthy to stay in power there.

Eurussia, again, requests the Tarajani Government not to divert the issues at hand and focus on the discussion as this is an international forum and hopes that professionalism is still practiced by these diplomats from New Tarajan. Furthermore, we welcome the suggestion of New Tarajan that let our forces to relax at home as it is actually part of our routine in the Imperial Armed Forces but only after a mission to spread peace in every corner of the world. And in reciprocation, we suggest to the Tarajani Government to instead watch and learn on how the international forces of the world help in liberating Texania so it could probably get experience and how to conduct proper intervention to achieve peace. And not just to intervene for the sake of having the prestige of doing so and serve solely ones self interest which is very unacceptable for the international community.

Now, going to the request of these Tarajani diplomats for us to expound the impossibility of its proposed plan, we will tell all of you in this General Meeting so for us to be able to share to New Tarajan how it could properly craft a viable plan most especially in the international arena of politics and global diplomacy.

First, demarcation line? Impossible because how can contingents be able to enforce that when both sides, expected not to heed on calls for ceasefire, are continuously exchanging fires? Isn't putting these contingents' lives on the line worst in a poorly planned situation?

Second, Austinia zone to the sea? Impossible because the Texanian capital is approximately 6,000 kilometers away from the nearest sea and if ever a neutral land is planned for the sake of the proposed logistics, security for such is a big risk. Furthermore, that 6,000 kilometers estimation is direct to the nearest sea which will traverse another independent country, which is Imabistan in which to avoid that, that proposed zone link to the sea should circumnavigate the border of Imabistan which will add 2,000 kilometers more. Isn't this poorly planned?

Third, missile strikes on both rebel groups? Ridiculous since you are sending a contingent in Texania and call for ceasefire and you will order these contingents to fire missiles on both sides? We have never heard of this kind of joke ever in any kind of military plan. Isn't this poorly planned? Is this the viable solution?

Fourth, neutral border zone? Unimaginable. Do we need to explain further?

Fifth, liberation of Austinia? For what? When we have done it already? So that contingent from New Tarajan, flying their flag side by side with the WAAF, could fly their flags up high in the sky of Austinia to tell the world they they have liberated it? Is this a joke?

Sixth, disarmament? Extremely impossible because you are calling for ceasefire and then you will fire missile strikes on both rebel groups and then you will call for disarmament? Do we expect the rebel groups wouldn't retaliate? That instead of just targetting themselves, they would surely take revenge on the contingent attacking them. Then the situation is perfectly worsened. Is this the perfect plan New Tarajan is talking about?

Seventh, ceasefire? Unimaginable after all the analysis above. Do we need to say more?

Eighth, non-cooperation as enemy? Ridiculous! The WAAF will be sending its contingent in Texania to bring supposedly peace and then if no one cooperates, will be treated as enemies? And then what? Sparking a world war? Is this serious? Really?

Ninth, international summit? For what? So the Ordu rebels and the Iguarr terrorists would compromise and make peace in Texania? And after all the forces leave the country a new civil war sparks again if any of the two sides is displeased? Or just simply hold a summit, we would believe to be hosted in New Tarajan for world delegates have a dinner and chats while thousands of civilians are being killed because of this peace summit? Is this how the Tarajani Government simply look at the gravity of the situation in the civil war?

Now, we could perfectly remember that that Tarajani Government has a political plan? After this so called military plan? Would our great colleagues from New Tarajan dare to present these political plans for the future of Texania when none of their military plans is expected to materialize much worst, succeed? Again, we still reject WAAF Intervention.

New Tarajan Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:12 pm

Thanks to the Eurussian government for such an in-depth explanation. However, I am sorry to recognize it was unuseful, due to the rapid developments of the situation in the field.
The situation is changed, but not our position.
The government of New Tarajan declares officially to be AGAINST any partitions of Texania, which would be simply a form of imperialism.

We wish to propose, together with our allies, an alternative plan which follows these points:

- Respect of the territorial integrity of Texania inside the borders BEFORE the beginning of the Civil War;
- WAAF-WAPF joint peace-keeping mission, with the main goal to provide safety to the citizens, disarmament of violent factions and building of vital strategic infrastructures;
- WAHO humanitarian mission to help the recovery of the population;
- WASEDA mission for the re-establishment of a vital economy and a decent administration (with funding of the WDB if possible);
- Establishment of a provisional coalition government, with the aim to give full independence to Texania as soon as the missions above will be succesfully finished;

United States of Europe Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:26 pm

New Tarajan wrote:Thanks to the Eurussian government for such an in-depth explanation. However, I am sorry to recognize it was unuseful, due to the rapid developments of the situation in the field.
The situation is changed, but not our position.
The government of New Tarajan declares officially to be AGAINST any partitions of Texania, which would be simply a form of imperialism.

We wish to propose, together with our allies, an alternative plan which follows these points:

- Respect of the territorial integrity of Texania inside the borders BEFORE the beginning of the Civil War;
- WAAF-WAPF joint peace-keeping mission, with the main goal to provide safety to the citizens, disarmament of violent factions and building of vital strategic infrastructures;
- WAHO humanitarian mission to help the recovery of the population;
- WASEDA mission for the re-establishment of a vital economy and a decent administration (with funding of the WDB if possible);
- Establishment of a provisional coalition government, with the aim to give full independence to Texania as soon as the missions above will be succesfully finished;

Precisely this will serve the mission of the WAAF, no one will take over to Texania, who will return to being an independent and prosperous.

New Tarajan Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:34 am

Exactly. the WAAF will have the responsibility for the operation, and at least the partition will be exclusively operational (like in Snarfia).
So, do we have your official support?

Great Eurussia Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:12 am

United States of Europe wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:Thanks to the Eurussian government for such an in-depth explanation. However, I am sorry to recognize it was unuseful, due to the rapid developments of the situation in the field.
The situation is changed, but not our position.
The government of New Tarajan declares officially to be AGAINST any partitions of Texania, which would be simply a form of imperialism.

We wish to propose, together with our allies, an alternative plan which follows these points:

- Respect of the territorial integrity of Texania inside the borders BEFORE the beginning of the Civil War;
- WAAF-WAPF joint peace-keeping mission, with the main goal to provide safety to the citizens, disarmament of violent factions and building of vital strategic infrastructures;
- WAHO humanitarian mission to help the recovery of the population;
- WASEDA mission for the re-establishment of a vital economy and a decent administration (with funding of the WDB if possible);
- Establishment of a provisional coalition government, with the aim to give full independence to Texania as soon as the missions above will be succesfully finished;
Precisely this will serve the mission of the WAAF, no one will take over to Texania, who will return to being an independent and prosperous.

Eurussia still rejects a late WAAF Intervention.

New Tarajan Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:29 am

In this case, we cannot avoid to ask to the WAAF to proceed without the Eurussian support.

Great Eurussia Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:37 am

New Tarajan wrote:In this case, we cannot avoid to ask to the WAAF to proceed without the Eurussian support.

If this is the case, an intervention of the WAAF without the approval of the majority of the Defense Council composed of all the representatives of all WAAF members as explicitly well defined in the WAAF Act will simply be ILLEGAL ensuring that all activities of the WAAF under that ILLEGAL INTERVENTION will simply become ILLEGAL in manner bringing shame to the entire organization and damage its integrity to its very core forever.

Hence, the government is not afraid to bring the matter to the WA Court of Justice. We are still against it unless a well presented plan for intervention is shown.

Eurussia remains against the late WAAF Intervention.

Federation of Antanares Mon Dec 02, 2013 1:49 am

Antanares approve a WAAF intervention in Texania. Also, it's necessary reorganize the entire list of the members of the WAAF, because some nations aren't still active.

Great Eurussia Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:11 am

Federation of Antanares wrote:Antanares approve a WAAF intervention in Texania. Also, it's necessary reorganize the entire list of the members of the WAAF, because some nations aren't still active.

Eurussia remains against any late WAAF Intervention until a well crafted plan is presented by the European Secretary General of the World Alliance Armed Forces.

Hence, Eurussia still rejects.

Great Eurussia Wed Dec 04, 2013 1:50 am

Eurussia supports the deployment of the WAAF in post-conflict Texania.

https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t246p900-world-alliance-international-news-network#10593

Shockwave Wed Dec 30, 2015 10:18 am

Locked citing the WA Inactive Events Act: https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t933-passed-inactive-events-act

Shockwave- World Alliance Role-play Moderator

Sponsored content

WAAF General Meeting