WAAF General Meeting

We understand the Eurussia's position. Antanares thinks is time to reform WAAF. It's true during the last crisis we don't operate how it's request to an important organisation like the World Alliance Armed Force. We were disorganized and inconclusive. A reform is that WAAF needs now. A reform that allow us to operate better, for the good of WA. With only good intentions nothing is possible.
Antanares hope we can reform the WAAF in small time. Yes, we are an Armed Force and we must operate like an armed force. But we must work together the Security Council and other organisation of WA. When diplomacy failed, we intervene. There is a lot of work to do and we hope all members of WAAF would to accept this delicate work that is a restructuring.

And, despite during the last crisis WAAF don't work at the maximum of its capacity, we don't think we did the worst work possible. Dromoda announced an attack and we moved in consequence. Not with a militarist behavior, only with the will to avoid a war. Next time I hope WAAF's members can work better and faster and demonstrate that we are ready to defend the integrity, the structure and the members of WA.

Ear the last words of delegate of USE, we think also is not necessary only search the support of other organisation. Antanares think WAAF must operate with maximum liberty is possible, without get out from the rules of WA.

So, to reorganize the WAAF in a better way, I thought the first two reforms, a central and a local.

A territorial division, with areas of exclusive competence.
These areas correspond to every continent.
For each area of ​​expertise WAAF, a nation will be chosen, of course dell'organizzazzione limbs, which will have the role of supervisor.
Oversee and coordinate the movements of the WAAF forces in the area, as well as to control the political life at local, so you can promptly notify the WAAF in case of threat.
In this nation will be based on WAAF Forces Command Region.
Thus, a nation of supervision and control for each continent, a Command Region for each continent.
In this way, the branched WAAF will be better and more ubiquitous.

At the central level, at the Security Council, must be a representative of the WAAF, which must be a member of the WAAF same.
He will consider the possibility of an intervention organization to prevent any threat of own initiative or on the recommendation of one of the nations supervisionatrici (which I mentioned above).
To organize the intervention itself (military, diplomatic or economic) will be operating the executor, a role that will be played by one of the member nations, which will develop the mission (the usual texts that I usually elaborate).
After that, the member nations will join the mission or discuss any points to be clarified.

As regards the Rapid Deployment Forces, may also be used without the autorizzazzione the nation to which they belong, given that it is accepted to grant only and exclusively for purposes of WAAF.
 
I would like to know what you think.

We agree with your proposals but we have some doubts about.
For example, what are the powers of every regional commander? What exactly he can do? Intervene with peacekeepers troops?

And also, for the proposal of Eurussia, the peacekeeping force who it propose is to weak. 300 men and 3 units? It's futile, also we just have the RDF.

Yes, I understand but I think, for do a optimal first response we need more troops. They should to do the first line of defense and a pressure counter who want to rouse the caos.

After the recent declaration of war from Ultra-nationalist Russia vs Shirouma (https://worldalliance.forumotion.co.uk/t211-cssn-shirouma-ultranationalist-russia-war) I propose the start of a peacekeeping mission. What I propose is to send troops to Shirouma and help them to defend against the invasion forces of Russia. After the defeat of the first wave of enemy and when Russia realize that this war can't continue if there are WAAF to help Shirouma, we can start a diplomatic mission and treat a peace treaty.
Antanares forces are just ready to intervene. I suggest to move fast to avoid civilians victims and also to avoid a real escalation. Now we can intervene and stop the war but if we wait too much time we risk a total war.

Shirouma is a member of the WAAF, and therefore will not let you alone against another attempt of imperialist expansionism.
Here we have a text of the mission, the members of the WAAF follow and which is open to participation by other nations.

Antanares will participate to this operation but now we must change the goal: North Rebordja support Russia and we must crack down it with its allies.
Also, ASSIS had invited the government to observe well Rebordja and its crusade. We think we must think them too.

Country Name: Federal Aristocratic Kingdom of New Tarajan
Adhesion military (yes or no): Yes
Extent of military forces brought into play: 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th Fleets; land troops to be decided
If you want to put its bases available to other participating nations (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the economic strategy (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the diplomatic strategy (yes or no): Yes

We agree with Antanares regarding Rebordja. The government of New Tarajan have yet delivered a note to them asking the withdrawal of their troops. If they'll not answer we have to presume that they support the vile attack on Shirouma.
Also, Rebordja has attacked Aloia, with a biological attack on Port Royale, Aloian capital city. We ask for an immediate WAAF intervention. The entire region is burning, and we cannnot sit down watching the fire spreading.

Country Name:Republic of Texania
Adhesion military (yes or no):Yes
Extent of military forces brought into play:Varies(above a total of 100,000 troops)
If you want to put its bases available to other participating nations (yes or no):Yes
Adherence to the economic strategy (yes or no):Yes
Adherence to the diplomatic strategy (yes or no):Yes

New Tarajan wrote:Country Name: Federal Aristocratic Kingdom of New Tarajan
Adhesion military (yes or no): Yes
Extent of military forces brought into play: 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th Fleets; land troops to be decided
If you want to put its bases available to other participating nations (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the economic strategy (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the diplomatic strategy (yes or no): Yes

We agree with Antanares regarding Rebordja. The government of New Tarajan have yet delivered a note to them asking the withdrawal of their troops. If they'll not answer we have to presume that they support the vile attack on Shirouma.
Also, Rebordja has attacked Aloia, with a biological attack on Port Royale, Aloian capital city. We ask for an immediate WAAF intervention. The entire region is burning, and we cannnot sit down watching the fire spreading.

 As for aid of Rebordja to Russia, no problem.
As mentioned explicitly in the text of the mission, all ships, including civil courts, which are directed towards Russia or coming out of that country will be blocked and searched.
In this way, we will avoid illegal military supplies.
Regarding Aloia, we keep the Rapid Deployment Forces ready to take action against Rebordja, but threats do not seem series.

Country Name: Federation of Antanares
Adhesion military (yes or no): Yes
Extent of military forces brought into play: 1st and 2nd fleet with support of four mechanized's division and four air squads.
If you want to put its bases available to other participating nations (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the economic strategy (yes or no): Yes
Adherence to the diplomatic strategy (yes or no): Yes

Also, Antanares would prepare an offensive counter Rebordja to set fire the drug's camp and eliminate the military's industry, to avoid other attacks to Aloia and also to other nations.

Marquette wishes to work with the WAAF, as long as we are not obliged to join the WAAF.

Perfect, thanks to our efforts Shirouma is safe, Russia withdrew from the invasion and did not receive military aid from Rebordja.
Now dobbiame go to the fourth phase of the mission, the consequences for the rogue state.
What do you propose?
I would propose a smilitarizzazzione but not too aggressive, the overthrow of the dictatorship of Stalin and the start of a process of democratization of the nation.

United States of Europe wrote:Perfect, thanks to our efforts Shirouma is safe, Russia withdrew from the invasion and did not receive military aid from Rebordja.
Now dobbiame go to the fourth phase of the mission, the consequences for the rogue state.
What do you propose?
I would propose a smilitarizzazzione but not too aggressive, the overthrow of the dictatorship of Stalin and the start of a process of democratization of the nation.

I propose we each get a small bit of land for a military base in case of further uproar by russia.

Texania wrote:

United States of Europe wrote:Perfect, thanks to our efforts Shirouma is safe, Russia withdrew from the invasion and did not receive military aid from Rebordja.
Now dobbiame go to the fourth phase of the mission, the consequences for the rogue state.
What do you propose?
I would propose a smilitarizzazzione but not too aggressive, the overthrow of the dictatorship of Stalin and the start of a process of democratization of the nation.

I propose we each get a small bit of land for a military base in case of further uproar by russia.

indeed

Antanares approve. I think an international military base could give stability to the region.

I think this should be where the international base is.
It is a great location for naval deployment in the area.

Demilitarization is something too heavy, would ultimately weigh heavily on Russia.
Would seize virtually reduced to a colony.
The Russian people would not accept it, and rise up against us.
We see this as "colonizers" and this could be exploited for the benefit of Stalin and his government.
Instead, the Russian people must see us as liberators by the totalitarian dictatorship.
We must make sure that the entire government to resign Stalin, and start a process of democratization in Russia.
Above all, once democratized, we should increase investment in economic Russia for develop the economy and create a good state apparatus.
In this way, the Russian people certainly sympathize with us.
In addition, we should have more covenants and friendship with that country.
In this way, protremo better control of the nation, and tighten the belt in case of problems.
If we do this, probably the Russian people will accept a place on our military presence, with an international basis.

The base would be open to international forces of the nations that participated in the mission against Russia, even those who have not joined officially and Shirouma.
Preferably, the place should be allocated Rapid Deployment Forces of the WAAF, if nations are membre of the organization.

What do you think?

United States of Europe wrote:Demilitarization is something too heavy, would ultimately weigh heavily on Russia.
Would seize virtually reduced to a colony.
The Russian people would not accept it, and rise up against us.
We see this as "colonizers" and this could be exploited for the benefit of Stalin and his government.
Instead, the Russian people must see us as liberators by the totalitarian dictatorship.
We must make sure that the entire government to resign Stalin, and start a process of democratization in Russia.
Above all, once democratized, we should increase investment in economic Russiaper to develop the economy and create a good state apparatus.
In this way, the Russian people certainly sympathize with us.
In addition, we should have more covenants and friendship with that country.
In this way, protremo better control of the nation, and tighten the belt in case of problems.
If we do this, probably the Russian people will accept a place on our military presence, with an international basis.

The base would be open to international forces of the nations that participated in the mission against Russia, even those who have not joined officially and Shirouma.
Preferably, the place should be allocated Rapid Deployment Forces of the WAAF, if nations are membre of the organization.

What do you think?

well we dont agree with the democratization part

Dromoda wrote:

United States of Europe wrote:Demilitarization is something too heavy, would ultimately weigh heavily on Russia.
Would seize virtually reduced to a colony.
The Russian people would not accept it, and rise up against us.
We see this as "colonizers" and this could be exploited for the benefit of Stalin and his government.
Instead, the Russian people must see us as liberators by the totalitarian dictatorship.
We must make sure that the entire government to resign Stalin, and start a process of democratization in Russia.
Above all, once democratized, we should increase investment in economic Russiaper to develop the economy and create a good state apparatus.
In this way, the Russian people certainly sympathize with us.
In addition, we should have more covenants and friendship with that country.
In this way, protremo better control of the nation, and tighten the belt in case of problems.
If we do this, probably the Russian people will accept a place on our military presence, with an international basis.

The base would be open to international forces of the nations that participated in the mission against Russia, even those who have not joined officially and Shirouma.
Preferably, the place should be allocated Rapid Deployment Forces of the WAAF, if nations are membre of the organization.

What do you think?

well we dont agree with the democratization part

 We have to do it, is a must.
The Russian people not appreciate a smitilarizzazione and a foreign presence in their national soil.
May arise, and Stalin would take advantage to strengthen his powers, increase its consensus and act against us once again.
Unless we do something for the Russian people.
So bring down the dictatorship, by dismissing the current government, and initiate a process of democratization.
Then, invest resources in Russia to make it develop economically and to create a good state apparatus.
In this way, we will check the best government of the new democratic Russia, and the people will see us as liberators.
So, we can safely maintain a massive military presence in that country.
In addition, we do not risk it a return to the government of Stalin, and not even revolutions and revolts in his name.