(Resolved) Scottlands vs Apepistan

Scottish Republic wrote:The Scottish Republic is asking for moral damages and slander against Apepistan for accusing the WTU of sinking their ship and when ask to provide evidence on the peace talks in Moscow, they left and they plan to make an embargo again by convincing ZAR. The Scottish Republic is a neutral and peaceful country and we want tobprotect our dignity on all accusations.


If you want proof I will send the link to the peace talks.

• Apepistan
  

1. The United Kingdoms of Apepistan never accused the WTU of sinking our ship.

2. The United Kingdoms of Apepistan never proposed an embargo against the WTU.

The United Kingdoms of Apepistan, however, would gladly send expert translators to the Scottish Republic in case the scottish authorities have a hard time understanding our statements.

Great Eurussia wrote:

• Apepistan
  

1. The United Kingdoms of Apepistan never accused the WTU of sinking our ship.

2. The United Kingdoms of Apepistan never proposed an embargo against the WTU.

The United Kingdoms of Apepistan, however, would gladly send expert translators to the Scottish Republic in case the scottish authorities have a hard time understanding our statements.

Scottlands is hereby requested to counter the arguments from Apepistan within two (2) days. However, for the speedy resolution of this arbitration, both Parties may continue to exchange arguments with utmost respect to each other and for the Security Council.

Azotakza wrote:
With WTU spreading lies about our members, calling us war Mongolers. I have called a dissuasion to talk about what should we do. WTU declared us a enemy as soon as they establish there Union, with out proper reason. Also with issue that they are trying to block us from trading with other non ZAR members. Scotland has been know to radically take action against something. Also WTU "trade ships" have been privateering ZAR tradeships. And they have the nerve to call us war mongolers.

Apepistan wrote:We have agreed that we will create cooperative convoys and escorts to our trade ships if they are being threatened and/or raided.
[...]
I suggest we invite a delegation from WTU to clear this issue; until then we must protect our trade ships in dangerous international waters. If the ZAR delegation of Azotakza, would show us on a map where these attacks happened, and quote when the WTU declared war on us would help too.

Apepistan wrote:The United Kingdoms of Apepistan requests that the WTU sends representatives to a meeting with the ZAR leadership to clear recent issues, mainly:

- The suspected attack of a ZAR trade ship by a WTU member.
- The diplomatic insults of WTU against ZAR and its members.
- The contradictory statements WTU leadership is making.

ZAR would gladly host the meeting for clearing these issues, but if a nation neutral to both WTU and ZAR will volunteer to do so, that is also acceptable. Telegram the Azotakzian ZAR representatives for the details, as they are the Head of the ZAR Court.

Thank you in advance.

Scottish Republic wrote:
The WTU rejects all your accusations. They are all lies. We will not attend any meeting with any ZAR country because of your accusations.

Apepistan wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:In an effort to harm and disrupt their trade, I propose to make a ZAR-wide trade embargo and blockade. [...] Furthermore, I propose naval escorts continue for a period of 2 weeks after the initial embargo, if nothing happens, we can probably call them off after that time period has passed.  

Failure to run this route, which is the only route left open to us by the WTU, will allow other trade leagues and nations run over us. We need to show that we are not to be messed with and that we will hold nations accountable for their acts of war against our trade league.

Apepistan proposes that we only embargo the WTU members. A blockade is not needed, obviously, we don't want to escalate this situation into an open conflict.

However, Eurussia is an observer state to the ZAR aswell and member of the WTU. Apepistan also signed a separate trade agreement with Eurussia. Therefore we propose that the WTU embargo will not include Eurussia.

We agree with the 2 weeks for naval escort.

Apepistan wrote:

Omega Atlantica wrote:I am Against at this moment in time... we are been visted by Scotlands' leader... it would not be the best thing for us to do

The United Kingdoms of Apepistan agrees. Finally we're opening a discussion; let us keep this proposal in delay until we know the outcome of it.

Apepistan wrote:

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:With the peace talks over, we suggest that we revote on the impending embargo against the world trade union. Scouting hereby calls to vote to embargo of the world trade union. Scouting votes for this action to take place.

The United Kingdoms of Apepistan suggest that instead of a full embargo, the ZAR introduces a significantly higher tax rate on WTU nations and wares produced by WTU nations.

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote: I am against. We should just forget about them and move on.

No, this is far from over, just because the Moscow Peace Summit didn't bring anything new. They even openly claim that the founder of ZAR, Azotakza, and also the United States of Scouting are their members:

Scottish Republic wrote:
WTU nations: Scottish Republic, Svaerige, Great Eurussia, Uzukima, Russia, China China, Omega Atlantica, Scouting, Azotakza,

We also highly suggest that both nations (Azotakza and the United States of Scouting), make a clear statement about this.

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:It has come to the attention of the Scouting Government that we have been listed as an active member of the WTU, World Trade Union. We want to announce to the World Alliance, that we are in fact NOT members of the WTU, and we disapprove of the WTU as a whole.

Thanks,
Durion Jarno
President of the United States of Scouting

Scottish Republic wrote:Scottish Republic files cases against Apepistan in international courts

Consistent to the neutral foreign policy of the Scottish Government, after all efforts failed to settle peace with Apepistan leader of ZAR, Lady Nicola ordered to file cases against the Apepistan in international courts to clean the name of the ALL of WTU and the Scottish Republic.

Scottish Republic wrote:We see that Apepistan never embargo Scottish Republic but the truth is whole WTU because we only refuse meeting. It is our right to refuse not to cooperate with Apepistan and ZAR because they accuse us of sinking their ship. [...]

suspect
verb
səˈspɛkt/
1.
have an idea or impression of the existence, presence, or truth of (something) without certain proof.

accuse
əˈkjuːz/
verb
charge (someone) with an offence or crime.

Scottish Republic wrote:If you are only suspecting WTU of sinking ZAR ship and not accusing, why resort to embargo and trade war against all of WTU when we did not cooperate and approve your request for discussions because we feel insulted too of being suspected on sinkig your ships without any evidence until now!

Azotakza wrote:I think it was a Svaerige ship.
The ship reported a flag of the WTU being flown above it.
Svaerige has been building tensions with ZAR after the treaty we plan failed.

Scottish Republic wrote:Where is the proof that WTU sink the ship?

Scottish Republic wrote:I have nothing more to say besides Apepistan admitted the crime already.

Omega Atlantica wrote:Honestly your all acting like children